You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc> on 2020/09/03 19:25:23 UTC

[VOTE] KIP-654 Aborting Transaction with non-flushed data should throw a non-fatal Exception

Hi,

I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.

*KIP *- 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception 
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception>

TL;DR: This KIP proposes to throw a new, non-fatal exception whilst 
aborting transactions with non-flushed data. This will help users 
distinguish non-fatal errors and potentially retry the batch.

Thanks,
-Gokul

Re: [VOTE] KIP-654 Aborting Transaction with non-flushed data should throw a non-fatal Exception

Posted by Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc>.

Thank you all. I will update the confluence pages with the status
and raise the PR once it is ready.

-Gokul

On 10-09-2020 03:22, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> +1 from me as well (non-binding)
>
> Gokul, it looks you've now received enough binding votes and the vote has
> been
> open for sufficiently long. You can conclude the vote and open the PR for
> review
> when it's ready
>
> Cheers,
> Sophie
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1. Thanks for the KIP Gokul !
>>
>> Guozhang
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:52 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On 9/8/20 2:49 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
>>>> +1 Thanks for the KIP!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
>>>>>
>>>>> *KIP *-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
>>>>> <
>>>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
>>>>> TL;DR: This KIP proposes to throw a new, non-fatal exception whilst
>>>>> aborting transactions with non-flushed data. This will help users
>>>>> distinguish non-fatal errors and potentially retry the batch.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Gokul
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> -- Guozhang
>>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-654 Aborting Transaction with non-flushed data should throw a non-fatal Exception

Posted by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>.

+1 from me as well (non-binding)

Gokul, it looks you've now received enough binding votes and the vote has
been
open for sufficiently long. You can conclude the vote and open the PR for
review
when it's ready

Cheers,
Sophie

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1. Thanks for the KIP Gokul !
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:52 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 9/8/20 2:49 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > > +1 Thanks for the KIP!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
> > >>
> > >> *KIP *-
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> TL;DR: This KIP proposes to throw a new, non-fatal exception whilst
> > >> aborting transactions with non-flushed data. This will help users
> > >> distinguish non-fatal errors and potentially retry the batch.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -Gokul
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-654 Aborting Transaction with non-flushed data should throw a non-fatal Exception

Posted by Guozhang Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.

+1. Thanks for the KIP Gokul !

Guozhang

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:52 PM Matthias J. Sax <mj...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> On 9/8/20 2:49 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > +1 Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
> >>
> >> *KIP *-
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> >> <
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> >>>
> >>
> >> TL;DR: This KIP proposes to throw a new, non-fatal exception whilst
> >> aborting transactions with non-flushed data. This will help users
> >> distinguish non-fatal errors and potentially retry the batch.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Gokul
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

-- 
-- Guozhang

Re: [VOTE] KIP-654 Aborting Transaction with non-flushed data should throw a non-fatal Exception

Posted by "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org>.

+1 (binding)

On 9/8/20 2:49 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> +1 Thanks for the KIP!
> 
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
>>
>> *KIP *-
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
>> <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
>>>
>>
>> TL;DR: This KIP proposes to throw a new, non-fatal exception whilst
>> aborting transactions with non-flushed data. This will help users
>> distinguish non-fatal errors and potentially retry the batch.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Gokul
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-654 Aborting Transaction with non-flushed data should throw a non-fatal Exception

Posted by Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io>.

+1 Thanks for the KIP!

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 12:25 PM Gokul Srinivas <ap...@nym3r0s.cc> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to call a vote on the following KIP.
>
> *KIP *-
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-654:+Aborted+transaction+with+non-flushed+data+should+throw+a+non-fatal+exception
> >
>
> TL;DR: This KIP proposes to throw a new, non-fatal exception whilst
> aborting transactions with non-flushed data. This will help users
> distinguish non-fatal errors and potentially retry the batch.
>
> Thanks,
> -Gokul
>
>