You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Adam Hardy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/02/09 16:22:59 UTC
[jira] Commented: (OPENJPA-609) Suggested changes/additions to the
EnhancingWithMaven page
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12671891#action_12671891 ]
Adam Hardy commented on OPENJPA-609:
------------------------------------
I found this config works best. The classes element takes just one directory where the plugin will search for classes to enhance. Note also the phase - better than just process-classes.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
<artifactId>openjpa-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>JPA Enhance</id>
<phase>process-test-classes</phase>
<goals>
<goal>enhance</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
<configuration>
<toolProperties>
<property>
<name>addDefaultConstructor</name>
<value>true</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>enforcePropertyRestrictions</name>
<value>true</value>
</property>
<property>
<name>properties</name>
<value>META-INF/persistence.xml#OpenJpaTest</value>
</property>
</toolProperties>
<classes>
${build.outputDirectory}/org/permacode/patternrepo/domain/entity/
</classes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
> Suggested changes/additions to the EnhancingWithMaven page
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OPENJPA-609
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-609
> Project: OpenJPA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Reporter: Michael Vorburger
> Priority: Minor
>
> I suggest the following edits to the to the EnhancingWithMaven page at http://openjpa.apache.org/enhancingwithmaven.html :
> 1) Add failonerror="true" to <java>
> 2) Use dir="${basedir}/target/classes" instead of dir="target/classes" because of problems with relative directories when using multi-project (POM with <modules> etc.) structure
> Explain/remind that the maven-antrun-plugin is very problematic... I ran into WEIRED issues with it because I had other instances of the maven-antrun-plugin in ANOTHER project than the one I was putting this into, and adding the maven-antrun-plugin with OpenJPA enhancement to a project caused class no longer found issues in another POM that also used the maven-antrun-plugin but worked before.
> If using the maven-antrun-plugin, could also taskdef to use the PCEnhancerTask/openjpac ant task. I found this to be more suitable as I can easily use <fileset><include><exclude> to e.g. exclude some classes that are in a JAR . Until I ran into the problem above and switched to the OpenJPA Maven Plugin, which works well actually.
> But point out that the OpenJPA Maven Plugin at http://mojo.codehaus.org/openjpa-maven-plugin comes with it's own fixed version of OpenJPA (currently a very outdated and no longer found 0.9.6 apparently!), which makes it a lot less useful... unless there is a way to work around this (force the version of a dependency of a plugin to another version?!). See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1132 (but http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1133).
> Lastly, the Enhancer could probably also be integrated into Maven using http://mojo.codehaus.org/exec-maven-plugin/java-mojo.html or http://maven.apache.org/guides/plugin/guide-ant-plugin-development.html; haven't tried this, but may be worth pointing out?
> PPS: Why don't you integrate the openjpa-maven-plugin with OpenJPA directly and test and distribute it?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.