You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@vxquery.apache.org by Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> on 2013/10/01 17:12:18 UTC
Binary artifacts (was: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2)
Hi Jochen,
Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts and that we need to vote on the sources.
Is that right?
Thanks,
Till
> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
>
> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps not
> what users expect.)
>
> Regardless of the answer, here's my
>
> +1
>
>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
>> consistent as well.
>>
>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>
>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>>>
>>> The RAT report is at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>>>
>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can
>> currently be found at
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>>>
>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>
>>> Please vote
>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Till
>
>
> --
> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends
> with the bully!"
>
> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
Re: Binary artifacts
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm just reviewing now if you can wait a mo, or I'll just vote on general@.
...ant
On Monday, October 7, 2013, Vinayak Borkar <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We do have 3 binding votes so far from:
>
> Jochen Wiedmann
> Cezar Andrei
> Vinayak Borkar
>
> I think we should be able to move to the next step of getting the IPMC
votes.
>
> Vinayak
>
>
> On 10/7/13 12:23 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>
>> Very well, so we can at least feed the maven repositories.I'd personally
>> still be in favour for a classical binary distribution (if for no other
>> reason than to discuss the format: zip, tar.gz, 7z, ....., but we can do
>> that on the source archive, if anyone desires.), but getetting out the
>> first release is top priority. So, let's go on.
>>
>> I didn't count. Do we have the 3 binding votes?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>
>>> as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
>>> However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a
>>> different directory in the repository.
>>> E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
>>> In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc
jars)
>>> and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
>>>
>>> Till
>>>
>>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project
>>>
>>> that
>>>>
>>>> doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are
publishing
>>>> binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards
like
>>>> containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
>>>> could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
>>>> release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not
>>>
>>> your
>>>>
>>>> question, I assume?
>>>>
>>>> So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for
>>>
>>> the
>>>>
>>>> users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them
as
>>>> an important part of the release.
>>>>
>>>> Jochen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>>>
>>>>> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available
in
>>>>> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts
>>>
>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> that we need to vote on the sources.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and
perhaps
>>>>>
>>>>> not
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what users expect.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report
is
>>>>>>> consistent as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The RAT report is at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release
>>>
>>> can
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> currently be found at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>>>>>
>>>>> friends
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with the bully!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>>>
>>> friends
>>>>
>>>> with the bully!"
>>>>
>>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Binary artifacts
Posted by Vinayak Borkar <vi...@gmail.com>.
We do have 3 binding votes so far from:
Jochen Wiedmann
Cezar Andrei
Vinayak Borkar
I think we should be able to move to the next step of getting the IPMC
votes.
Vinayak
On 10/7/13 12:23 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Very well, so we can at least feed the maven repositories.I'd personally
> still be in favour for a classical binary distribution (if for no other
> reason than to discuss the format: zip, tar.gz, 7z, ....., but we can do
> that on the source archive, if anyone desires.), but getetting out the
> first release is top priority. So, let's go on.
>
> I didn't count. Do we have the 3 binding votes?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jochen,
>>
>> as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
>> However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a
>> different directory in the repository.
>> E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
>> In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc jars)
>> and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
>>
>> Till
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project
>> that
>>> doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are publishing
>>> binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards like
>>> containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
>>> could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
>>> release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not
>> your
>>> question, I assume?
>>>
>>> So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for
>> the
>>> users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them as
>>> an important part of the release.
>>>
>>> Jochen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>>
>>>> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in
>>>> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts
>> and
>>>> that we need to vote on the sources.
>>>>
>>>> Is that right?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
>>>>>
>>>>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps
>>>> not
>>>>> what users expect.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
>>>>>> consistent as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
>>>>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RAT report is at:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release
>> can
>>>>>> currently be found at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>>>> friends
>>>>> with the bully!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>> friends
>>> with the bully!"
>>>
>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Binary artifacts (was: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating
0.2)
Posted by Till <ti...@westmann.org>.
We can certainly discuss both points.
For the binary release I think that it would make a lot more sense for the next
release, as we'll have better support to distribute to different machines. For
the version that we just voted on, this is still completely manual.
For the format of the archives I shifted from "as many as possible" (for the
first RC) to "just one" because it seemed wasteful to deal with many formats as
long as we don't have the right content. If we get this release out (and have
the right content) we can certainly go back to more archive formats.
Till
> Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> hat am 7. Oktober 2013 um 09:23 geschrieben:
>
>
> Very well, so we can at least feed the maven repositories.I'd personally
> still be in favour for a classical binary distribution (if for no other
> reason than to discuss the format: zip, tar.gz, 7z, ....., but we can do
> that on the source archive, if anyone desires.), but getetting out the
> first release is top priority. So, let's go on.
>
> I didn't count. Do we have the 3 binding votes?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jochen,
> >
> > as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
> > However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a
> > different directory in the repository.
> > E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
> > In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc jars)
> > and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
> >
> > Till
> >
> > On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project
> > that
> > > doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are publishing
> > > binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards like
> > > containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
> > > could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
> > > release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not
> > your
> > > question, I assume?
> > >
> > > So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for
> > the
> > > users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them as
> > > an important part of the release.
> > >
> > > Jochen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Jochen,
> > >>
> > >> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in
> > >> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts
> > and
> > >> that we need to vote on the sources.
> > >>
> > >> Is that right?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Till
> > >>
> > >>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
> > >>>
> > >>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps
> > >> not
> > >>> what users expect.)
> > >>>
> > >>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
> > >>>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
> > >>>> consistent as well.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
> > >>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The tag to be voted on is
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The RAT report is at:
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release
> > can
> > >>>> currently be found at
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote
> > >>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
> > >>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Till
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
> > >> friends
> > >>> with the bully!"
> > >>>
> > >>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
> > friends
> > > with the bully!"
> > >
> > > Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends
> with the bully!"
>
> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
Re: Binary artifacts (was: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2)
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
Very well, so we can at least feed the maven repositories.I'd personally
still be in favour for a classical binary distribution (if for no other
reason than to discuss the format: zip, tar.gz, 7z, ....., but we can do
that on the source archive, if anyone desires.), but getetting out the
first release is top priority. So, let's go on.
I didn't count. Do we have the 3 binding votes?
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
> However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a
> different directory in the repository.
> E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
> In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc jars)
> and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
>
> Till
>
> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project
> that
> > doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are publishing
> > binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards like
> > containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
> > could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
> > release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not
> your
> > question, I assume?
> >
> > So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for
> the
> > users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them as
> > an important part of the release.
> >
> > Jochen
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jochen,
> >>
> >> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in
> >> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts
> and
> >> that we need to vote on the sources.
> >>
> >> Is that right?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Till
> >>
> >>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
> >>>
> >>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps
> >> not
> >>> what users expect.)
> >>>
> >>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
> >>>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
> >>>> consistent as well.
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
> >>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tag to be voted on is
> >>>>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
> >>>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The RAT report is at:
> >>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
> >>>>>
> >>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release
> can
> >>>> currently be found at
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote
> >>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
> >>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Till
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
> >> friends
> >>> with the bully!"
> >>>
> >>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
> friends
> > with the bully!"
> >
> > Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>
>
--
"That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends
with the bully!"
Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
Re: Binary artifacts (was: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2)
Posted by Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>.
Hi Jochen,
as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a different directory in the repository.
E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc jars) and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
Till
On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project that
> doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are publishing
> binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards like
> containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
> could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
> release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not your
> question, I assume?
>
> So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for the
> users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them as
> an important part of the release.
>
> Jochen
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jochen,
>>
>> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in
>> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts and
>> that we need to vote on the sources.
>>
>> Is that right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Till
>>
>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
>>>
>>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps
>> not
>>> what users expect.)
>>>
>>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
>>>> consistent as well.
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
>>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>>>>>
>>>>> The RAT report is at:
>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can
>>>> currently be found at
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote
>>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>> friends
>>> with the bully!"
>>>
>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends
> with the bully!"
>
> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
Re: Binary artifacts (was: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2)
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project that
doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are publishing
binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards like
containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not your
question, I assume?
So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for the
users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them as
an important part of the release.
Jochen
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
> Hi Jochen,
>
> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in
> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts and
> that we need to vote on the sources.
>
> Is that right?
>
> Thanks,
> Till
>
> > On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
> >
> > (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps
> not
> > what users expect.)
> >
> > Regardless of the answer, here's my
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
> >> consistent as well.
> >>
> >>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
> >> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> >>>
> >>> The tag to be voted on is
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> >>>
> >>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
> >>>
> >>> The RAT report is at:
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
> >>>
> >>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can
> >> currently be found at
> >>>
> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
> >>>
> >>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
> >>>
> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> >>>
> >>> Please vote
> >>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
> >>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Till
> >
> >
> > --
> > "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
> friends
> > with the bully!"
> >
> > Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>
--
"That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends
with the bully!"
Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero