You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Francesco Mari (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/24 10:43:04 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3441) SecurityProviderImpl should not be an OSGi component

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14906027#comment-14906027 ] 

Francesco Mari commented on OAK-3441:
-------------------------------------

Backported to 1.2 in r1705014.

> SecurityProviderImpl should not be an OSGi component
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3441
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3441
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Francesco Mari
>            Assignee: Francesco Mari
>
> With the introduction of SecurityProviderRegistration in OAK-3201, SecurityProviderImpl doesn't need to be registered as an OSGi component anymore. SecurityProviderImpl should be turned into a plain class in a backwards compatible way.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)