You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@beam.apache.org by "Valentyn Tymofieiev (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/01/13 18:32:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BEAM-12900) Dataflow fails to materialize elements over 2GB

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17475601#comment-17475601 ] 

Valentyn Tymofieiev edited comment on BEAM-12900 at 1/13/22, 6:31 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you also face this error with --experiments=use_runner_v2 ?


was (Author: tvalentyn):
Do you also face this error with --experiments=beam_runner_v2 ?

> Dataflow fails to materialize elements over 2GB
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-12900
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12900
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: io-py-gcp, runner-dataflow, sdk-py-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.32.0
>            Reporter: Dmytro Sadovnychyi
>            Priority: P2
>              Labels: stale-P2
>
> In some cases when we have some big individual element (e.g. after a Combine) and given a combination of side-inputs afterwards Dataflow might decide to materialize PCollection into temporary storage (on GCS using avrofile with simple "bytes" schema) – this process fails if our element is more than 2GB in size.
> Job ID: 2021-09-15_02_14_12-14362936082336076824
> Stacktrace:
> ```
> Error message from worker: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dataflow_worker/batchworker.py", line 651, in do_work work_executor.execute() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dataflow_worker/executor.py", line 181, in execute op.finish() File "dataflow_worker/native_operations.py", line 93, in dataflow_worker.native_operations.NativeWriteOperation.finish File "dataflow_worker/native_operations.py", line 94, in dataflow_worker.native_operations.NativeWriteOperation.finish File "dataflow_worker/native_operations.py", line 95, in dataflow_worker.native_operations.NativeWriteOperation.finish File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/dataflow_worker/nativeavroio.py", line 308, in __exit__ self._data_file_writer.flush() File "fastavro/_write.pyx", line 664, in fastavro._write.Writer.flush File "fastavro/_write.pyx", line 639, in fastavro._write.Writer.dump File "fastavro/_write.pyx", line 451, in fastavro._write.snappy_write_block File "fastavro/_write.pyx", line 458, in fastavro._write.snappy_write_block File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/apache_beam/io/filesystemio.py", line 200, in write self._uploader.put(b) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/apache_beam/io/gcp/gcsio.py", line 720, in put self._conn.send_bytes(data.tobytes()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/multiprocessing/connection.py", line 200, in send_bytes self._send_bytes(m[offset:offset + size]) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/multiprocessing/connection.py", line 393, in _send_bytes header = struct.pack("!i", n) struct.error: 'i' format requires -2147483648 <= number <= 2147483647
> ```
> This can be solved via a Reshuffle which forces it to be materialized on a shuffling service instead, which doesn't have this limitation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)