You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@marvin.apache.org by Lucas Bonatto Miguel <lu...@gmail.com> on 2018/11/09 08:25:06 UTC
Re: Future support to R
Alan, the issues that will help you implement the changes to support R are
created in our Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, guys
>
> I will like to get this and work with a start on this task this week based
> today in your python-engine and I'll tell you about the progress.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 17:19, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
> >
> > > This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs,
> > > Prototypes, experiments"
> > >
> > > Let's continue the discussion there.
> > >
> > > EOF
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY
> > > >
> > > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > > > lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me.
> Could
> > > you
> > > > > add a link to the image?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Lucas
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png]
> > > > > > attached the arch draw..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> To try to give a little more details about this "new concept"
> that
> > > we
> > > > > >> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple
> > architecture
> > > > > draw.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox something
> > > > > >> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic. Also
> in
> > > > this
> > > > > new
> > > > > >> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines and
> > > make
> > > > > easy
> > > > > >> the support for new languages.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user
> must
> > to
> > > > > >> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S (once
> the
> > > > REPL
> > > > > is
> > > > > >> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass commands).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Taka
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende <
> > > > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> escreveu:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello
> > > > > >>> <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> > Alan,
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>> > To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help us
> > with
> > > > some
> > > > > >>> > problems
> > > > > >>> > but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the new
> > > concept
> > > > > >>> will be
> > > > > >>> > the future
> > > > > >>> > or not. Am I right?
> > > > > >>> >
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus on
> the
> > > > > >>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction, then
> > > there
> > > > > >>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't agreement,
> a
> > > vote
> > > > > >>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse.
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> --
> > > > > >>> Luciano Resende
> > > > > >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Future support to R
Posted by Daniel Takabayashi <da...@gmail.com>.
Guys, anyone has question about what should be done?
Push more code ???? Lol
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 23, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <lu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> All the issue have description, or am I wrong?
>
> Before upadting, it's good to hear if anyone has any questions about what
> needs to be done. I think it's relatively clear.
>
> IMO, better use of your time would be pushing some code to help us to move
> forward.
> I believe this one is a strong candidate:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues/MARVIN-3?filter=allopenissues
>
> - Lucas
>
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Guys
>>
>> To help ourselves to avoid more misunderstanding I will update all the
>> issues we need to do to archive this big feature, everybody is ok with
>> this?
>>
>> Em sex, 9 de nov de 2018 às 00:25, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
>> lucasbonatto@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> Alan, the issues that will help you implement the changes to support R
>> are
>>> created in our Jira
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ok, guys
>>>>
>>>> I will like to get this and work with a start on this task this week
>>> based
>>>> today in your python-engine and I'll tell you about the progress.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
>>>> daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 17:19, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
>>>>> lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs,
>>>>>> Prototypes, experiments"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's continue the discussion there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EOF
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
>>>>>> daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
>>>>>>> lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me.
>>>> Could
>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> add a link to the image?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Lucas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
>>>>>>>> daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png]
>>>>>>>>> attached the arch draw..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi <
>>>>>>>>> daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To try to give a little more details about this "new
>> concept"
>>>> that
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple
>>>>> architecture
>>>>>>>> draw.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox
>>> something
>>>>>>>>>> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic.
>>> Also
>>>> in
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines
>>> and
>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>> easy
>>>>>>>>>> the support for new languages.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user
>>>> must
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S
>> (once
>>>> the
>>>>>>> REPL
>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass
>>> commands).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Taka
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende <
>>>>>>>> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> escreveu:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello
>>>>>>>>>>> <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help
>> us
>>>>> with
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>>> problems
>>>>>>>>>>>> but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the
>> new
>>>>>> concept
>>>>>>>>>>> will be
>>>>>>>>>>>> the future
>>>>>>>>>>>> or not. Am I right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus
>> on
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction,
>>> then
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>>>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't
>>> agreement,
>>>> a
>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Future support to R
Posted by Lucas Bonatto Miguel <lu...@apache.org>.
All the issue have description, or am I wrong?
Before upadting, it's good to hear if anyone has any questions about what
needs to be done. I think it's relatively clear.
IMO, better use of your time would be pushing some code to help us to move
forward.
I believe this one is a strong candidate:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues/MARVIN-3?filter=allopenissues
- Lucas
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Guys
>
> To help ourselves to avoid more misunderstanding I will update all the
> issues we need to do to archive this big feature, everybody is ok with
> this?
>
> Em sex, 9 de nov de 2018 às 00:25, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> lucasbonatto@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> > Alan, the issues that will help you implement the changes to support R
> are
> > created in our Jira
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, guys
> > >
> > > I will like to get this and work with a start on this task this week
> > based
> > > today in your python-engine and I'll tell you about the progress.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 17:19, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > > > lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs,
> > > > > Prototypes, experiments"
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's continue the discussion there.
> > > > >
> > > > > EOF
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > > > > > lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me.
> > > Could
> > > > > you
> > > > > > > add a link to the image?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Lucas
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png]
> > > > > > > > attached the arch draw..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> To try to give a little more details about this "new
> concept"
> > > that
> > > > > we
> > > > > > > >> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple
> > > > architecture
> > > > > > > draw.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox
> > something
> > > > > > > >> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic.
> > Also
> > > in
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > >> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines
> > and
> > > > > make
> > > > > > > easy
> > > > > > > >> the support for new languages.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user
> > > must
> > > > to
> > > > > > > >> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S
> (once
> > > the
> > > > > > REPL
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > >> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass
> > commands).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >> Taka
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende <
> > > > > > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >> escreveu:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello
> > > > > > > >>> <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > > >>> > Alan,
> > > > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > > >>> > To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help
> us
> > > > with
> > > > > > some
> > > > > > > >>> > problems
> > > > > > > >>> > but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the
> new
> > > > > concept
> > > > > > > >>> will be
> > > > > > > >>> > the future
> > > > > > > >>> > or not. Am I right?
> > > > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > > >>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction,
> > then
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > >>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't
> > agreement,
> > > a
> > > > > vote
> > > > > > > >>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse.
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> --
> > > > > > > >>> Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > > >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Future support to R
Posted by Daniel Takabayashi <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Guys
To help ourselves to avoid more misunderstanding I will update all the
issues we need to do to archive this big feature, everybody is ok with this?
Em sex, 9 de nov de 2018 às 00:25, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
lucasbonatto@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Alan, the issues that will help you implement the changes to support R are
> created in our Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MARVIN/issues
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:59 AM Alan Silva <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Ok, guys
> >
> > I will like to get this and work with a start on this task this week
> based
> > today in your python-engine and I'll tell you about the progress.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:24 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 17:19, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > > lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
> > >
> > > > This discussion is now duplicated at the thread with title "POCs,
> > > > Prototypes, experiments"
> > > >
> > > > Let's continue the discussion there.
> > > >
> > > > EOF
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:50 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/shajxIpLJHxxMbFgDXiPuhg/image?w=602&h=461&rev=1423&ac=1&parent=1ySERHGBXbHeyCMRookq5UfTuFkzzU0ugtjvR3rF3deY
> > > > >
> > > > > Em qui, 25 de out de 2018 às 11:20, Lucas Bonatto Miguel <
> > > > > lucasbm88@apache.org> escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Daniel, I can't open your attachment. It is broken for me.
> > Could
> > > > you
> > > > > > add a link to the image?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Lucas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:11 PM Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [image: marvin-architecture-views (5).png]
> > > > > > > attached the arch draw..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 17:09, Daniel Takabayashi <
> > > > > > > daniel.takabayashi@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> To try to give a little more details about this "new concept"
> > that
> > > > we
> > > > > > >> want to bring to the marvin toolbox, I did this simple
> > > architecture
> > > > > > draw.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The general idea here is try to transform the toolbox
> something
> > > > > > >> disconnected with the "language", something more agnostic.
> Also
> > in
> > > > > this
> > > > > > new
> > > > > > >> architecture we could use remote resource to process engines
> and
> > > > make
> > > > > > easy
> > > > > > >> the support for new languages.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This "new toolbox" will be the only thing that a Marvin user
> > must
> > > to
> > > > > > >> install and also we could start to support multiples O.S (once
> > the
> > > > > REPL
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > >> a dummy application that only interprets and by pass
> commands).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Taka
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Em qua, 24 de out de 2018 às 12:44, Luciano Resende <
> > > > > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >> escreveu:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:56 PM Rafael Novello
> > > > > > >>> <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > >>> > Alan,
> > > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > >>> > To be honest, I don't know. The new toolbox concept help us
> > > with
> > > > > some
> > > > > > >>> > problems
> > > > > > >>> > but it create others. I believe we need to vote if the new
> > > > concept
> > > > > > >>> will be
> > > > > > >>> > the future
> > > > > > >>> > or not. Am I right?
> > > > > > >>> >
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> We usually only require a vote when there is no consensus on
> > the
> > > > > > >>> community. If the community agrees with the new direction,
> then
> > > > there
> > > > > > >>> isn't a need for a formal vote. In case there isn't
> agreement,
> > a
> > > > vote
> > > > > > >>> can be a possibility to resolve the impasse.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> --
> > > > > > >>> Luciano Resende
> > > > > > >>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > >>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>