Re: R:R:pathargs problem

[Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>]

Scott Boag/CAM/Lotus wrote:
> 
> > Then I'm sorry but we just found a XSLT spec bug :)
> >
> > it should really be "xsl:version" since otherwise we don't know whose
> > version that is.
> 
> One assumes that if an attribute is not namespaced, it is "owned" by the
> element.  

Where is this behavior specified?

> Therefore, I don't think there is any ambiguity about who's
> version it is.  (The same is not true with simple LRE stylesheets, where
> clearly the version attribute must be namespaced).

Hmmm, I see your point, but using xsl:version is not illegal and should
mean the same thing... in that case, Xalan has a bug you should fix :)
 
> Or is there some spec out there somewhere that specifies version
> attributes, that I'm not aware of?  

No. Nothing I know of.

> I didn't think this was either part of
> the Infoset spec, Namespace spec, or XML spec, but I could be wrong.  I
> guess maybe it should be part of one of those specs.
> 
> -scott

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
                          able to give birth to a dancing star.
<st...@apache.org>                             Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
 Come to the first official Apache Software Foundation Conference!  
------------------------- http://ApacheCon.Com ---------------------