You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org> on 2012/08/09 12:24:02 UTC

ALL_TRUSTED does not disable DKIM_ADSP_ALL

X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-0.1, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=1.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
	DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NO_X_MAILER=0.1] autolearn=no

ALL_TRUSTED does not disable DKIM_ADSP_ALL

priority error ?

-- 
Benny Pedersen

Re: ALL_TRUSTED does not disable DKIM_ADSP_ALL

Posted by Mark Martinec <Ma...@ijs.si>.

Benny,

> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5
> 	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-0.1, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=1.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
> 	DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NO_X_MAILER=0.1] autolearn=no
> 
> ALL_TRUSTED does not disable DKIM_ADSP_ALL

Why would an ALL_TRUSTED be disabling an ADSP test???
Trust path and ADSP are independent concepts.

Apparently the above sample contained a valid third-party signature,
i.e. a domain in "From" not matching the 'd' tag in a signature,
yet the domain in "From" claims all its mail should have a
valid author domain signature.

> priority error ?

I don't think so, whatever that means.

  Mark