You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de> on 2016/08/30 21:45:03 UTC
Creadur Web Site
Hi,
I'm just curious why the staging site[1].
is more up-to-date ((Release 0.12 is on this page)
than the main site[2] and why the site build [3] is not working ?
Unmergeable scheduling requested on an entry: Can't add
'/usr/local/websites/creadur/trunk/content/rat/apache-rat/jira-report.html'
to a parent directory scheduled for deletion at
/usr/local/cms/build/lib/ASF/SVNUtil.pm line 69
For the later I have created an INFRA[4] ticket
Apart from that is there a simple way to publish from the staging site
to production (In Maven we have: https://cms.apache.org/maven/publish)
to publish from staging to production...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
[1]: http://creadur.staging.apache.org/
[2]: http://creadur.apache.org/
[3]: https://ci.apache.org/builders/creadur-site-staging/
[4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12528
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Am 09.09.2016 um 22:48 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> You can define a language level in a parent pom and overwrite it in a
> child ...so no problem...
fine with me - just create a ticket and go ahead :-)
The builds will verify that stuff is working fine.
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 09/09/16 22:43, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 09.09.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>> after taking a deeper look (pom's in particular) into the different
>> parts whiskers, tentacles and rat...
>>
>> I'm the opinion there must be done something to generalize the pom's of
>> the different parts / projects to prevent pom duplications etc. and of
>> course to make site generation from all parts more simpler...
>
> +1
>
> I'm not sure if all of creadur's part can use one masterpom, since RAT
> uses a much older JDK language/compiler level than the rest of the
> incubating subprojects.
You can define a language level in a parent pom and overwrite it in a
child ...so no problem...
>
>> And yes of course let use wait for the git repo and see how git
>> publishing works ...
>
> :-)
>
> Phil
>
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Am 09.09.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> after taking a deeper look (pom's in particular) into the different
> parts whiskers, tentacles and rat...
>
> I'm the opinion there must be done something to generalize the pom's of
> the different parts / projects to prevent pom duplications etc. and of
> course to make site generation from all parts more simpler...
+1
I'm not sure if all of creadur's part can use one masterpom, since RAT
uses a much older JDK language/compiler level than the rest of the
incubating subprojects.
> And yes of course let use wait for the git repo and see how git
> publishing works ...
:-)
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 09/09/16 22:21, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi Karlheinz,
>
> sorry to hear that.
For what do you appologize ?
>
> Am 09.09.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>> I have filed in the information into the issue[1]
>
> After reading your comments in the ticket I've decided to request a new
> repo:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur-site.git
> with github integration.
>
> Let's see which way works faster ;-)
>
> Phil
>
Hi Phil,
after taking a deeper look (pom's in particular) into the different
parts whiskers, tentacles and rat...
I'm the opinion there must be done something to generalize the pom's of
the different parts / projects to prevent pom duplications etc. and of
course to make site generation from all parts more simpler...
And yes of course let use wait for the git repo and see how git
publishing works ...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 10/09/16 21:32, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Am 10.09.2016 um 01:54 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>>
>> I have made a small change on the site to see how long it takes..very
>> short time...the larger the change the longer it takes..
>
> great news! Thanks.
>
> I tried changing the subdirectory rat, but the stuff does not seem to be
> autopublished as did the main index.html file.
>
> Do I need to trigger something?
No. You need just a little bit more patient..;-)
I've seen that you changed the whole part RAT ...which is a little bit
more...
Now I can see the change...Keep in mind to renew the browser cache...
(ca. 6 minutes from receiving your mail at about 21:32 and seeing the
new content 21:38 ..)...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Am 10.09.2016 um 01:54 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>
> I have made a small change on the site to see how long it takes..very
> short time...the larger the change the longer it takes..
great news! Thanks.
I tried changing the subdirectory rat, but the stuff does not seem to be
autopublished as did the main index.html file.
Do I need to trigger something?
Thanks
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
I have chatted with INFRA...they have setup the gitpubsub system...
Currently everything from asf-site will be published to life site.
I have updated the content of the asf-site branch with the production
site content from SVN to get back old state first.
I have summarized some informations:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/projects/ponymail.conf
https://ci.apache.org/builders/infrastructure-puppet-deployment/builds/691/steps/git/logs/stdio
As an example:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail-site how to build a
site...but I assume we want to build the site via maven or something else?
So this git repo contains the content of the whole site (old
state)(creadur.apache.org):
I have made a small change on the site to see how long it takes..very
short time...the larger the change the longer it takes..
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 10/09/16 00:37, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On 10/09/16 00:17, P. Ottlinger wrote:
>> Am 10.09.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>>>
>>> shouldn't that be put on a branch called asf-site ? Or do i mistaken
>>> something?
>>
>> DONE.
>>
>> Not sure what is happening/needs to happen yet.
>
> If I correctly understand that git repo creadur-site.git is for the
> whole site and not only for RAT ... which means for creadur.apache.org ?
> But let see if it working and than we can change it...
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 10/09/16 00:17, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Am 10.09.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>>
>> shouldn't that be put on a branch called asf-site ? Or do i mistaken
>> something?
>
> DONE.
>
> Not sure what is happening/needs to happen yet.
If I correctly understand that git repo creadur-site.git is for the
whole site and not only for RAT ... which means for creadur.apache.org ?
But let see if it working and than we can change it...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Am 10.09.2016 um 00:08 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>
> shouldn't that be put on a branch called asf-site ? Or do i mistaken
> something?
DONE.
Not sure what is happening/needs to happen yet.
Thanks
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 09/09/16 23:55, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Am 09.09.2016 um 22:21 schrieb P. Ottlinger:
>> After reading your comments in the ticket I've decided to request a new
>> repo:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur-site.git
>> with github integration.
>
> I've pushed the current RAT site to the main branch of above repo.
shouldn't that be put on a branch called asf-site ? Or do i mistaken
something?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
>
> How do we link this to any webpage/host in the ASF universe?
>
> Thanks
> Phil
>
>
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Am 09.09.2016 um 22:21 schrieb P. Ottlinger:
> After reading your comments in the ticket I've decided to request a new
> repo:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur-site.git
> with github integration.
I've pushed the current RAT site to the main branch of above repo.
How do we link this to any webpage/host in the ASF universe?
Thanks
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi Karlheinz,
sorry to hear that.
Am 09.09.2016 um 17:20 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> I have filed in the information into the issue[1]
After reading your comments in the ticket I've decided to request a new
repo:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur-site.git
with github integration.
Let's see which way works faster ;-)
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
So I have tried (a few days ago) to copy the content of the stagin site
to the production site (via svn) unfortunately the Site will not be
updated...
I have filed in the information into the issue[1]
Kind Regards
Karl Heinz
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12231
On 05/09/16 09:17, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> On 05/09/16 09:08, P. Ottlinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 05.09.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>>>
>>> Why waiting so long? Do you have no time at the moment?
>>
>> I thought waiting longer yields a bigger chanhce for feedback, but maybe
>> you are right.
>
> The most important feedback I have is that the current site is not
> uptodate ...
>
>>
>>> If you so I can try to publish the site?
>>
>> Go ahead - can you add more details on what you did to the howto page.
>> src/site/apt/site-publish.apt
>
> I will try to do this evening...and see if it works...
>
>>
>> It seems that we need to share the secret knowledge on howto release the
>> software itself and update the docs.
>
> Yes...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Phil
>>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 05/09/16 09:08, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 05.09.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>>
>> Why waiting so long? Do you have no time at the moment?
>
> I thought waiting longer yields a bigger chanhce for feedback, but maybe
> you are right.
The most important feedback I have is that the current site is not
uptodate ...
>
>> If you so I can try to publish the site?
>
> Go ahead - can you add more details on what you did to the howto page.
> src/site/apt/site-publish.apt
I will try to do this evening...and see if it works...
>
> It seems that we need to share the secret knowledge on howto release the
> software itself and update the docs.
Yes...
>
> Thanks,
> Phil
>
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Am 05.09.2016 um 08:59 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>
> Why waiting so long? Do you have no time at the moment?
I thought waiting longer yields a bigger chanhce for feedback, but maybe
you are right.
> If you so I can try to publish the site?
Go ahead - can you add more details on what you did to the howto page.
src/site/apt/site-publish.apt
It seems that we need to share the secret knowledge on howto release the
software itself and update the docs.
Thanks,
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi Phil,
On 04/09/16 21:29, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 04.09.2016 um 00:10 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>> Transfer content of target/staging
>> (manually done to gh-pages branch for above example which works).
>
> thanks for your help!
>
> I've regenerated the site under
> https://ottlinger.github.io/creadur-rat-examples/index.html
>
> In case no-one objects I'd try to publish the site at around 2016-09-11.
Why waiting so long? Do you have no time at the moment?
If you so I can try to publish the site?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
>
> Thanks,
> Phil
>
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Am 04.09.2016 um 00:10 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> Transfer content of target/staging
> (manually done to gh-pages branch for above example which works).
thanks for your help!
I've regenerated the site under
https://ottlinger.github.io/creadur-rat-examples/index.html
In case no-one objects I'd try to publish the site at around 2016-09-11.
Thanks,
Phil
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
On 03/09/16 20:27, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi Karlheinz,
>
> thanks for your input.
>
> Before we do that I'd like to fix the currently broken site -
> the mvn-site-reports of the subprojects are not linked correctly.
I have setup an example site:
https://khmarbaise.github.io/creadur-rat-site-example/
which works. I had to add an index.apt.vm page for apache-rat-api module
(committed).
So the cookbook to create the site (first edition) is as follows:
1. Step
mvn clean install
Trying to do "mvn site" does not work, cause the aggegrate goal
of maven-javadoc-plugin forks the lifecycle which means
it tries to run "mvn generate-resources" for all modules, but
at that time the jar's have not being generated which produces
a failure.
2. Step
mvn site site:stage
This can be separated into two steps:
mvn site
mvn site:stage
(The site:stage is needed to gather all modules together
into a single directory where you can test from) and
where you publish from...
3. Step
Transfer content of target/staging
(manually done to gh-pages branch for above example which works).
Kind regards
Karl Heinz
>
> Before we decide upon changing the way we build/generate the site we
> should fix it or document how it's done correctly.
>
> You can see what I mean by errors at
> https://ottlinger.github.io/creadur-rat-examples/index.html
> (generated from trunk on 2016-08-29).
>
> Thanks for your help :-)
> Phil
>
> Am 03.09.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>>
>> With [2] you have started to request informations to use the gitpubsub
>> or svnpubsub but not yet decided if you need a site for the overall project
>>
>> creadur-site.git
>>
>> or only for the RAT part..
>>
>> creadur-rat-site.git
>>
>>
>> Based on [1] the content needed to be kept in SVN branch...and will be
>> replicated to the git site...
>>
>>
>> Should I request the https://reporeq.apache.org/ the repo ? for the
>> whole creadur-site.git ?
>
>
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi Karlheinz,
thanks for your input.
Before we do that I'd like to fix the currently broken site -
the mvn-site-reports of the subprojects are not linked correctly.
Before we decide upon changing the way we build/generate the site we
should fix it or document how it's done correctly.
You can see what I mean by errors at
https://ottlinger.github.io/creadur-rat-examples/index.html
(generated from trunk on 2016-08-29).
Thanks for your help :-)
Phil
Am 03.09.2016 um 15:01 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
>
> With [2] you have started to request informations to use the gitpubsub
> or svnpubsub but not yet decided if you need a site for the overall project
>
> creadur-site.git
>
> or only for the RAT part..
>
> creadur-rat-site.git
>
>
> Based on [1] the content needed to be kept in SVN branch...and will be
> replicated to the git site...
>
>
> Should I request the https://reporeq.apache.org/ the repo ? for the
> whole creadur-site.git ?
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by Karl Heinz Marbaise <kh...@gmx.de>.
Hi,
I wasn't aware that you are terminating the usage of the CMS sorry for
this noise...so [4] is done.
But I'm not sure why?
Just using the check-in on the site source will be built by
https://ci.apache.org/builders/creadur-site-staging/ and
you can preview the site on https://creadur.staging.apache.org/ and if
you like to publish to life site simply do a publish
(cms.apache.org/creadur/publish)... You don't need to use the cms itself
which I don't like too... On the other hand the VOTE seemed not finished
yet...
With [2] you have started to request informations to use the gitpubsub
or svnpubsub but not yet decided if you need a site for the overall project
creadur-site.git
or only for the RAT part..
creadur-rat-site.git
Based on [1] the content needed to be kept in SVN branch...and will be
replicated to the git site...
Should I request the https://reporeq.apache.org/ the repo ? for the
whole creadur-site.git ?
[1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.html#generated
[2]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12231
[4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12528
On 30/08/16 23:45, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just curious why the staging site[1].
> is more up-to-date ((Release 0.12 is on this page)
> than the main site[2] and why the site build [3] is not working ?
>
> Unmergeable scheduling requested on an entry: Can't add
> '/usr/local/websites/creadur/trunk/content/rat/apache-rat/jira-report.html'
> to a parent directory scheduled for deletion at
> /usr/local/cms/build/lib/ASF/SVNUtil.pm line 69
>
> For the later I have created an INFRA[4] ticket
>
> Apart from that is there a simple way to publish from the staging site
> to production (In Maven we have: https://cms.apache.org/maven/publish)
> to publish from staging to production...
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz
>
> [1]: http://creadur.staging.apache.org/
> [2]: http://creadur.apache.org/
> [3]: https://ci.apache.org/builders/creadur-site-staging/
> [4]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12528
>
Re: Creadur Web Site
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Am 30.08.2016 um 23:45 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
> I'm just curious why the staging site[1].
> is more up-to-date ((Release 0.12 is on this page)
> than the main site[2] and why the site build [3] is not working ?
as I mentioned yesterday: the site from the 0.12-branch is buggy (it
contains some things that are already fixed on the HEAD's site).
But .... the links to the submodules are broken.
If you've got any idea how to fix that: go ahead.
https://ottlinger.github.io/creadur-rat-examples/index.html
What do you mean by: the site build is broken?
https://builds.apache.org/job/Creadur-Rat-Site/
works fine.
Phil