You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/09/26 16:27:45 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36816] New: -
BalancerManager interface doesn't work if BalancerMember has port or path
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36816>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36816
Summary: BalancerManager interface doesn't work if BalancerMember
has port or path
Product: Apache httpd-2.0
Version: 2.1.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: mod_proxy
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: cmurtaugh@yahoo.com
If BalancerMembers are configured with a port number or path, then they are not
editable in the BalancerManager interface. Clicking on the worker hostname in
the interface brings up the 'Edit balancer settings' form instead of the 'Edit
worker settings' form.
These workers won't be editable via the interface:
<Proxy balancer://test1>
BalancerMember http://my.server.com:1234
BalancerMember http://otner.server.com:1234/myapp
</Proxy>
but this is OK:
<Proxy balancer://test1>
BalancerMember http://my.server.com
BalancerMember http://otner.server.com
</Proxy>
In both cases, the actual proxying of requests seems to work fine; it's just the
balancer manager that doesn't work right for the first cluster.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org