You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2006/07/26 12:20:46 UTC
Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin 3.1.4 release
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> Doc Schneider wrote:
> > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> >> Doc Schneider wrote:
> >>> I had some errors when upgrading to 3.1.4 on CentOS 4.3 I created an
> >>> rpm for it also besides trying to install it from the tarball.
> >>>
> >>> Seems to be some conflicts with a few rules. Some SARE rules and the
> >>> SA rules also. Should I paste the errors here from a spamassassin
> >>> --lint -D or open a ticket?
> >>>
> >>> I do mostly my development work on an old RH 7.2 boxen but use CentOS
> >>> for some of my servers. I had no errors on my RH 7.2 box, though. Go
> >>> figure.
> >>
> >> Whatever you prefer.
> >>
> >> Daryl
> >>
> >
> > Here it is. I'll open a ticket if you all think this is something that
> > could be a problem. It lints fine with no errors. I copied just the bits
> > that seemed to me to be an issue.
> >
> > [31752] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
> > 'DCC_CHECK'
> > [31752] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_8BIT_NOSPM has undefined
> > dependency '__SARE_HEAD_8BIT_DATE'
>
> These aren't errors, just info. See bug 4347.
>
> Notice that a --lint returns success.
>
> $ spamassassin --lint && echo $?
> 0
to clarify -- Doc, you're only seeing those messages with "-D" or
"-Dinfo", right? Not just from "spamassassin --lint" with no debugs?
They should not be visible without at least "-Dinfo".
--j.
Re: [VOTE] SpamAssassin 3.1.4 release
Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
Justin Mason wrote:
> Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
>> Doc Schneider wrote:
>>> Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>>>> Doc Schneider wrote:
>>>>> I had some errors when upgrading to 3.1.4 on CentOS 4.3 I created an
>>>>> rpm for it also besides trying to install it from the tarball.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems to be some conflicts with a few rules. Some SARE rules and the
>>>>> SA rules also. Should I paste the errors here from a spamassassin
>>>>> --lint -D or open a ticket?
>>>>>
>>>>> I do mostly my development work on an old RH 7.2 boxen but use CentOS
>>>>> for some of my servers. I had no errors on my RH 7.2 box, though. Go
>>>>> figure.
>>>> Whatever you prefer.
>>>>
>>>> Daryl
>>>>
>>> Here it is. I'll open a ticket if you all think this is something that
>>> could be a problem. It lints fine with no errors. I copied just the bits
>>> that seemed to me to be an issue.
>>>
>>> [31752] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
>>> 'DCC_CHECK'
>>> [31752] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_8BIT_NOSPM has undefined
>>> dependency '__SARE_HEAD_8BIT_DATE'
>> These aren't errors, just info. See bug 4347.
>>
>> Notice that a --lint returns success.
>>
>> $ spamassassin --lint && echo $?
>> 0
>
> to clarify -- Doc, you're only seeing those messages with "-D" or
> "-Dinfo", right? Not just from "spamassassin --lint" with no debugs?
>
> They should not be visible without at least "-Dinfo".
>
> --j.
Yes it was only with a spamassassin --lint -D that I saw those
"warnings" it does --lint with no warnings/errors.
I always do a --lint -D when upgrading. 8*)
I'm also +1 but am not a PMC (Just a lowly committer)
--
-Doc
SA/SARE -- Ninja
3:28pm up 43 days, 17:05, 15 users, load average: 0.43, 0.42, 0.53
SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/