You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> on 2015/11/25 15:11:39 UTC
5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in
this branch.
Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4
will delay a release candidate build.
Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these
tickets asap.
I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
Thanks!
Upayavira
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version
> 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect
> that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble)
> blocker� "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased
> authorization causes issue with replication"
>
> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the
> release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical� "Move
> solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical� "Add
> tests for bin/post"
>
> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back
> a release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker� "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
> - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira
Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?)
Posted by "david.w.smiley@gmail.com" <da...@gmail.com>.
I plan to address SOLR-8180 which is about adding jcl-over-slf4j as a
dependency on SolrJ.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:11 AM Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this
> branch.
>
> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will
> delay a release candidate build.
>
> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets
> asap.
>
> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>
> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the
> feature freeze starts.
>
> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>
> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
> "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
> issue with replication"
>
> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>
> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
> "Add tests for bin/post"
>
> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
> release
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>
> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others),
> blocker
> "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>
> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
> consider this a blocker either.
>
> - o -
>
> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention.
> Anyone have comments/observations here?
>
> I will create the branch shortly.
>
> Upayavira
>
>
>
--
Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com