You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@apisix.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/05/30 08:28:47 UTC
[GitHub] [apisix] tao12345666333 opened a new issue, #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
tao12345666333 opened a new issue, #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164
### Description
Currently we are using [Semantic Pull Requests](https://github.com/zeke/semantic-pull-requests ) to check in PR but the project is no longer maintained. we need some alternatives.
e.g.
* https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request
If anyone is interested in this, please submit a PR to complete this replacement
### Environment
- APISIX version (run `apisix version`):
- Operating system (run `uname -a`):
- OpenResty / Nginx version (run `openresty -V` or `nginx -V`):
- etcd version, if relevant (run `curl http://127.0.0.1:9090/v1/server_info`):
- APISIX Dashboard version, if relevant:
- Plugin runner version, for issues related to plugin runners:
- LuaRocks version, for installation issues (run `luarocks --version`):
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1179696517
> > May use git submodule to do this.
>
> Right!
I can understand the need to replace `semantic-pull-request` with `action-semantic-pull-request`, but why use `git submodule`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1186712295
I found that [action-semantic-pull-request](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request) does not support the characteristic "allowRevertCommit" which [semantic-pull-request](https://github.com/zeke/semantic-pull-requests) support, is there some mistake in my understanding?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] tao12345666333 commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tao12345666333 commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1144645063
> May use git submodule to do this.
Right!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1183806387
> Personally, Github Workflow job better than submodule, just like [Lint](https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/master/.github/workflows/lint.yml)
Does you mean, do `git checkout` in github workflows instead of `git submoudle`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1185043656
> @ccxhwmy submodle is more suitable.
I found that doing `git clone` in the github workflows still works, Would you tell me why `git submodule` is more suitable? I want to learn more about it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] tao12345666333 commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tao12345666333 commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1184101685
@ccxhwmy submodle is more suitable.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1179493332
> ### Description
> Currently we are using [Semantic Pull Requests](https://github.com/zeke/semantic-pull-requests) to check in PR but the project is no longer maintained. we need some alternatives.
>
> e.g.
>
> * https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request
>
> If anyone is interested in this, please submit a PR to complete this replacement
What does `check in PR` mean?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ccxhwmy commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1186813294
> [amannn/action-semantic-pull-request#192](https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/issues/192) I see you have opened an issue for it. If the action doesn't support it, we can omit it for now.
ok~
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] spacewander commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
spacewander commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1186793353
https://github.com/amannn/action-semantic-pull-request/issues/192
I see you have opened an issue for it.
If the action doesn't support it, we can omit it for now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] tao12345666333 commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tao12345666333 commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1179711839
@ccxhwmy ref: https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-secrets.html
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] tokers commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tokers commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1144623956
May use git submodule to do this.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] kwanhur commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
kwanhur commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1144606033
Note it:
```
We only allow Actions that are official "Made by GitHub" or local to the Apache org on GitHub, to address a potential security vulnerability. This is an incident-related policy change. We are researching the situation, and the policy may evolve based on what we learn.
```
https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-secrets.html
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] juzhiyuan closed issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
juzhiyuan closed issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [apisix] kwanhur commented on issue #7164: help request: Alternatives to Semantic Pull Requests
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
kwanhur commented on issue #7164:
URL: https://github.com/apache/apisix/issues/7164#issuecomment-1180402716
Personally, Github Workflow job better than submodule, just like [Lint](https://github.com/apache/apisix/blob/master/.github/workflows/lint.yml)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: notifications-unsubscribe@apisix.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org