You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2004/11/06 18:45:53 UTC
[BLOCKER] AXIS-1649 (Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?)
Glen,
Can you please take a look at this one?
(http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1649) before cutting RC2?
thanks,
dims
On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:40:57 -0800, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon!
>
> It is possible that something changed in AxisServlet, but the vast majority
> of Axis' functionality is inside the AxisEngine itself. Therefore if there
> were a performance problem, I'd expect it to show up even with
> SimpleAxisServer as the server side. We should test with Tomcat too,
> though.
>
> I ran some tests yesterday as well, and didn't see any serious differences
> between 1.1 and 1.2, switching versions of both clients and servers. But we
> do have this open bug, and I think Sam mentioned seeing a slowdown as well -
> Sam, do you in fact see the perf issue you were talking about with simple
> tests, or just in cases where you're using a whole grid stack
> (WS-Addr/RF/etc)?
>
> If there's an issue, I'd like to know about it (with a minimal and
> reproducible test case), and if not I'm all for moving ahead. In any case,
> I'll plan to release RC2 this weekend (I'm a little too swamped to guarantee
> tonight).
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Simon Fell [mailto:sfell@salesforce.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:50 AM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; dims@apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> >
> > Isn't likely that in this case all you're comparing is the
> > perf of SimpleAxisServer ?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Simon
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:07 AM
> > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > >
> > > Glen,
> > >
> > > I just uploaded a zip with a stand-alone test case that can be run
> > > against both 1.1 and 1.2 using SimpleAxisServer and dynamically
> > > generated stubs (for
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608).
> > >
> > > Bottom Line: There is NO problem with performance (at least
> > NOT with
> > > this test case).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -- dims
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 10:06:17 -0800, Glen Daniels
> > > <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This sounds like a good plan to me, dims, except:
> > > >
> > > > My main worry at this point is the performance degradation we're
> > > > seeing in
> > > > 1.2 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608). I
> > don't feel
> > > > comfortable releasing 1.2 final until we've resolved this.
> > > Is anyone
> > > > focusing on this issue right now? I can try to look at it
> > > this week,
> > > > but I'm not on the greatest performance-analysis machine
> > > (I'm still travelling).
> > > > Just getting a couple of good profiling runs with Axis
> > 1.1 and then
> > > > 1.2 would be really useful, I bet.
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, I'll plan to release 1.2RC2 this week, probably
> > > Friday. If we
> > > > manage to nail the performance problem, perhaps RC2 will be good
> > > > enough to be 1.2Final. Otherwise, we might need RC3 then Final.
> > > >
> > > > Does this seem reasonable? Everyone else agree that the
> > > performance
> > > > issue is really major?
> > > >
> > > > --Glen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:46 PM
> > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > > >
> > > > > Glen,
> > > > > Can you please cut a RC2 next week? Then me and Ias can
> > > start again
> > > > > on the TCK testing and we can release 1.2 as soon as we
> > > finish with
> > > > > the TCK. We can shoot for a 1.2 Release before/during
> > > ApacheCon (Nov
> > > > > 15-17) if all goes well.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tom,
> > > > > Do you want to take a crack at exposing the jaxrpc
> > > compliance flag
> > > > > via the tools?
> > > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > > If you have patches that have not yet been committed.
> > > Please let me
> > > > > know ASAP by adding a comment in JIRA. (After making sure
> > > that the
> > > > > patches can be applied to current CVS)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > dims
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: Vote: RE: [BLOCKER] AXIS-1649 (Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?)
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Jarek,
Am sure we can fix the problem if we know what the problem is....my
vote is to leave things as-s right now, BUT find your problem AND fix
it.
thx,
dims
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 13:52:29 -0500, Jarek Gawor <ga...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I'm also still having problems with
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1614. The type mappings in the
> stub in certain cases (I'm trying to narrow it down now) is generated
> incorrectly.
>
> This bug is a blocker to us. So far, this whole change generated far more
> problems for us then did any good. I believe this change was done way too
> late in the release process and should be reversed.
>
> Can we please vote on this issue?
>
> Jarek
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 12:46 PM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > Subject: [BLOCKER] AXIS-1649 (Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?)
> >
> >
> > Glen,
> >
> > Can you please take a look at this one?
> > (http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1649) before cutting RC2?
> >
> > thanks,
> > dims
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:40:57 -0800, Glen Daniels
> > <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon!
> > >
> > > It is possible that something changed in AxisServlet, but the vast
> > > majority of Axis' functionality is inside the AxisEngine itself.
> > > Therefore if there were a performance problem, I'd expect
> > it to show
> > > up even with SimpleAxisServer as the server side. We
> > should test with
> > > Tomcat too, though.
> > >
> > > I ran some tests yesterday as well, and didn't see any serious
> > > differences between 1.1 and 1.2, switching versions of both clients
> > > and servers. But we do have this open bug, and I think Sam
> > mentioned
> > > seeing a slowdown as well - Sam, do you in fact see the
> > perf issue you
> > > were talking about with simple tests, or just in cases where you're
> > > using a whole grid stack (WS-Addr/RF/etc)?
> > >
> > > If there's an issue, I'd like to know about it (with a minimal and
> > > reproducible test case), and if not I'm all for moving
> > ahead. In any
> > > case, I'll plan to release RC2 this weekend (I'm a little
> > too swamped
> > > to guarantee tonight).
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Glen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Simon Fell [mailto:sfell@salesforce.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:50 AM
> > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; dims@apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > >
> > > > Isn't likely that in this case all you're comparing is
> > the perf of
> > > > SimpleAxisServer ?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Simon
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:07 AM
> > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > > >
> > > > > Glen,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just uploaded a zip with a stand-alone test case that
> > can be run
> > > > > against both 1.1 and 1.2 using SimpleAxisServer and dynamically
> > > > > generated stubs (for
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608).
> > > > >
> > > > > Bottom Line: There is NO problem with performance (at least
> > > > NOT with
> > > > > this test case).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > -- dims
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 10:06:17 -0800, Glen Daniels
> > > > > <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This sounds like a good plan to me, dims, except:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My main worry at this point is the performance
> > degradation we're
> > > > > > seeing in 1.2
> > (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608).
> > > > > > I
> > > > don't feel
> > > > > > comfortable releasing 1.2 final until we've resolved this.
> > > > > Is anyone
> > > > > > focusing on this issue right now? I can try to look at it
> > > > > this week,
> > > > > > but I'm not on the greatest performance-analysis machine
> > > > > (I'm still travelling).
> > > > > > Just getting a couple of good profiling runs with Axis
> > > > 1.1 and then
> > > > > > 1.2 would be really useful, I bet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway, I'll plan to release 1.2RC2 this week, probably
> > > > > Friday. If we
> > > > > > manage to nail the performance problem, perhaps RC2
> > will be good
> > > > > > enough to be 1.2Final. Otherwise, we might need RC3
> > then Final.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does this seem reasonable? Everyone else agree that the
> > > > > performance
> > > > > > issue is really major?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Glen
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:46 PM
> > > > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > > Subject: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Glen,
> > > > > > > Can you please cut a RC2 next week? Then me and Ias can
> > > > > start again
> > > > > > > on the TCK testing and we can release 1.2 as soon as we
> > > > > finish with
> > > > > > > the TCK. We can shoot for a 1.2 Release before/during
> > > > > ApacheCon (Nov
> > > > > > > 15-17) if all goes well.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tom,
> > > > > > > Do you want to take a crack at exposing the jaxrpc
> > > > > compliance flag
> > > > > > > via the tools?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > > > If you have patches that have not yet been committed.
> > > > > Please let me
> > > > > > > know ASAP by adding a comment in JIRA. (After making sure
> > > > > that the
> > > > > > > patches can be applied to current CVS)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > dims
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >
> >
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Re: [BLOCKER] AXIS-1649 (Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?)
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Glen,
Do you think http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1366 is a blocker?
-- dims
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 12:45:53 -0500, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Glen,
>
> Can you please take a look at this one?
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1649) before cutting RC2?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:40:57 -0800, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon!
> >
> > It is possible that something changed in AxisServlet, but the vast majority
> > of Axis' functionality is inside the AxisEngine itself. Therefore if there
> > were a performance problem, I'd expect it to show up even with
> > SimpleAxisServer as the server side. We should test with Tomcat too,
> > though.
> >
> > I ran some tests yesterday as well, and didn't see any serious differences
> > between 1.1 and 1.2, switching versions of both clients and servers. But we
> > do have this open bug, and I think Sam mentioned seeing a slowdown as well -
> > Sam, do you in fact see the perf issue you were talking about with simple
> > tests, or just in cases where you're using a whole grid stack
> > (WS-Addr/RF/etc)?
> >
> > If there's an issue, I'd like to know about it (with a minimal and
> > reproducible test case), and if not I'm all for moving ahead. In any case,
> > I'll plan to release RC2 this weekend (I'm a little too swamped to guarantee
> > tonight).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Glen
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Simon Fell [mailto:sfell@salesforce.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:50 AM
> > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; dims@apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > >
> > > Isn't likely that in this case all you're comparing is the
> > > perf of SimpleAxisServer ?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:07 AM
> > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > >
> > > > Glen,
> > > >
> > > > I just uploaded a zip with a stand-alone test case that can be run
> > > > against both 1.1 and 1.2 using SimpleAxisServer and dynamically
> > > > generated stubs (for
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608).
> > > >
> > > > Bottom Line: There is NO problem with performance (at least
> > > NOT with
> > > > this test case).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -- dims
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 10:06:17 -0800, Glen Daniels
> > > > <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This sounds like a good plan to me, dims, except:
> > > > >
> > > > > My main worry at this point is the performance degradation we're
> > > > > seeing in
> > > > > 1.2 (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608). I
> > > don't feel
> > > > > comfortable releasing 1.2 final until we've resolved this.
> > > > Is anyone
> > > > > focusing on this issue right now? I can try to look at it
> > > > this week,
> > > > > but I'm not on the greatest performance-analysis machine
> > > > (I'm still travelling).
> > > > > Just getting a couple of good profiling runs with Axis
> > > 1.1 and then
> > > > > 1.2 would be really useful, I bet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, I'll plan to release 1.2RC2 this week, probably
> > > > Friday. If we
> > > > > manage to nail the performance problem, perhaps RC2 will be good
> > > > > enough to be 1.2Final. Otherwise, we might need RC3 then Final.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this seem reasonable? Everyone else agree that the
> > > > performance
> > > > > issue is really major?
> > > > >
> > > > > --Glen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:46 PM
> > > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glen,
> > > > > > Can you please cut a RC2 next week? Then me and Ias can
> > > > start again
> > > > > > on the TCK testing and we can release 1.2 as soon as we
> > > > finish with
> > > > > > the TCK. We can shoot for a 1.2 Release before/during
> > > > ApacheCon (Nov
> > > > > > 15-17) if all goes well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom,
> > > > > > Do you want to take a crack at exposing the jaxrpc
> > > > compliance flag
> > > > > > via the tools?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > > If you have patches that have not yet been committed.
> > > > Please let me
> > > > > > know ASAP by adding a comment in JIRA. (After making sure
> > > > that the
> > > > > > patches can be applied to current CVS)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > dims
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
--
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
Vote: RE: [BLOCKER] AXIS-1649 (Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?)
Posted by Jarek Gawor <ga...@mcs.anl.gov>.
I'm also still having problems with
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1614. The type mappings in the
stub in certain cases (I'm trying to narrow it down now) is generated
incorrectly.
This bug is a blocker to us. So far, this whole change generated far more
problems for us then did any good. I believe this change was done way too
late in the release process and should be reversed.
Can we please vote on this issue?
Jarek
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 12:46 PM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: [BLOCKER] AXIS-1649 (Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?)
>
>
> Glen,
>
> Can you please take a look at this one?
> (http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1649) before cutting RC2?
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:40:57 -0800, Glen Daniels
> <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon!
> >
> > It is possible that something changed in AxisServlet, but the vast
> > majority of Axis' functionality is inside the AxisEngine itself.
> > Therefore if there were a performance problem, I'd expect
> it to show
> > up even with SimpleAxisServer as the server side. We
> should test with
> > Tomcat too, though.
> >
> > I ran some tests yesterday as well, and didn't see any serious
> > differences between 1.1 and 1.2, switching versions of both clients
> > and servers. But we do have this open bug, and I think Sam
> mentioned
> > seeing a slowdown as well - Sam, do you in fact see the
> perf issue you
> > were talking about with simple tests, or just in cases where you're
> > using a whole grid stack (WS-Addr/RF/etc)?
> >
> > If there's an issue, I'd like to know about it (with a minimal and
> > reproducible test case), and if not I'm all for moving
> ahead. In any
> > case, I'll plan to release RC2 this weekend (I'm a little
> too swamped
> > to guarantee tonight).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Glen
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Simon Fell [mailto:sfell@salesforce.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 11:50 AM
> > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; dims@apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > >
> > > Isn't likely that in this case all you're comparing is
> the perf of
> > > SimpleAxisServer ?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Simon
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 10:07 AM
> > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > >
> > > > Glen,
> > > >
> > > > I just uploaded a zip with a stand-alone test case that
> can be run
> > > > against both 1.1 and 1.2 using SimpleAxisServer and dynamically
> > > > generated stubs (for
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608).
> > > >
> > > > Bottom Line: There is NO problem with performance (at least
> > > NOT with
> > > > this test case).
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -- dims
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 10:06:17 -0800, Glen Daniels
> > > > <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This sounds like a good plan to me, dims, except:
> > > > >
> > > > > My main worry at this point is the performance
> degradation we're
> > > > > seeing in 1.2
> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1608).
> > > > > I
> > > don't feel
> > > > > comfortable releasing 1.2 final until we've resolved this.
> > > > Is anyone
> > > > > focusing on this issue right now? I can try to look at it
> > > > this week,
> > > > > but I'm not on the greatest performance-analysis machine
> > > > (I'm still travelling).
> > > > > Just getting a couple of good profiling runs with Axis
> > > 1.1 and then
> > > > > 1.2 would be really useful, I bet.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyway, I'll plan to release 1.2RC2 this week, probably
> > > > Friday. If we
> > > > > manage to nail the performance problem, perhaps RC2
> will be good
> > > > > enough to be 1.2Final. Otherwise, we might need RC3
> then Final.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this seem reasonable? Everyone else agree that the
> > > > performance
> > > > > issue is really major?
> > > > >
> > > > > --Glen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:46 PM
> > > > > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: Axis 1.2 RC2? Final?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glen,
> > > > > > Can you please cut a RC2 next week? Then me and Ias can
> > > > start again
> > > > > > on the TCK testing and we can release 1.2 as soon as we
> > > > finish with
> > > > > > the TCK. We can shoot for a 1.2 Release before/during
> > > > ApacheCon (Nov
> > > > > > 15-17) if all goes well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tom,
> > > > > > Do you want to take a crack at exposing the jaxrpc
> > > > compliance flag
> > > > > > via the tools?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Folks,
> > > > > > If you have patches that have not yet been committed.
> > > > Please let me
> > > > > > know ASAP by adding a comment in JIRA. (After making sure
> > > > that the
> > > > > > patches can be applied to current CVS)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > dims
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
>