[jira] [Resolved] (CXF-5465) policy.xsd used in rt-ws-policy's blueprint configuration is inconsistent

["Aki Yoshida (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Aki Yoshida resolved CXF-5465.
------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 2.7.9
                   2.6.12
                   3.0.0-milestone2

> policy.xsd used in rt-ws-policy's blueprint configuration is inconsistent
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-5465
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-5465
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: WS-* Components
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.8
>            Reporter: Aki Yoshida
>            Assignee: Aki Yoshida
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-milestone2, 2.6.12, 2.7.9
>
>
> According to the CXF documentation, 
> http://cxf.apache.org/docs/schemas-and-namespaces.html
> the schema for CXF's policy configuration has namespace "http://cxf.apache.org/policy" for both spring and blueprint, but the schema location is given as "http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/policy.xsd" and "http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/blueprint/policy.xsd", respectively.
> Although the lookup of these two schemas will unlikely occur at the same time (because one for only spring context and the other one for only blueprint context), assigning a namespace to two different locations with different contents could lead to an unexpected behavior. For example, schema at "http://cxf.apache.org/schemas/blueprint/policy.xsd" has the target namespace set to  http://cxf.apache.org/blueprint/policy.
> As it seems these two schemas can be unified into one schema without any dependency to spring or blueprint, we should use one unified schema for both contexts.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)