You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aries.apache.org by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> on 2018/01/02 13:10:57 UTC
[VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Hi all,
I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
release and is thus not included in this set.
org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
[ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
exceptions
org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
[ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
exceptions
[ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
Please vote:
+1 Approve the release
-1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Best regards,
David Bosschaert
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by Dominik Przybysz <al...@gmail.com>.
It's ok for me if we stop releasing jmx-blueprint-bundle and jmx-bundle,
but then I think we should also remove those sub projects from aries repo.
My vote is not a 'veto'.
2018-01-02 18:25 GMT+01:00 David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> Nothing has changed in jmx-api, that's why I didn't release that one.
>
> The jmx-bundle and jmx-blueprint-bundle you are referring to are 'uber'
> bundles that are a combination of other bundles. Since we agreed on this
> list to do modular releases for Aries JMX [1] these uber bundles aren't
> really compatible with that... I guess they can still be released but they
> would need some sort of aggregate version number.
>
> Personally I don't see a strong reason to release these aggregate bundles,
> as using them is really an OSGi anti-pattern IMHO. However if anyone feels
> that these should be released they can be released separately.
>
> @Dominik, I hope your -1 is not a 'veto', if it is please let us know.
> Otherwise I think we can continue this release vote and, as mentioned those
> bundles can still be released later.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1f870e20c5f13da6dd0995f501e9ee
> 279a30532efa77125203307ecd@%3Cdev.aries.apache.org%3E
>
> On 2 January 2018 at 16:17, Dominik Przybysz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > -1
> >
> > Versions are ok, but you have still missed two bundles which also should
> be
> > released together in this release.
> > I saw your message that nothing in them wasn't changed but they shouldn't
> > change - they are bundles which shade those ones you have released:
> > https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-
> > blueprint-bundle/pom.xml
> > https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-bundle/pom.xml
> >
> > 2018-01-02 16:05 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon <fr...@openobject.fr>
> :
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > François
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> > > > updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> > > > The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> > > > release and is thus not included in this set.
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> > > > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws
> > inconsistent
> > > > exceptions
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> > > > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > > > exceptions
> > > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > > >
> > > > Staging repository:
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachearies-1123
> > > >
> > > > Please vote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 Approve the release
> > > > -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> > > >
> > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > David Bosschaert
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pozdrawiam / Regards,
> > Dominik Przybysz
> >
>
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Dominik Przybysz
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dominik,
Nothing has changed in jmx-api, that's why I didn't release that one.
The jmx-bundle and jmx-blueprint-bundle you are referring to are 'uber'
bundles that are a combination of other bundles. Since we agreed on this
list to do modular releases for Aries JMX [1] these uber bundles aren't
really compatible with that... I guess they can still be released but they
would need some sort of aggregate version number.
Personally I don't see a strong reason to release these aggregate bundles,
as using them is really an OSGi anti-pattern IMHO. However if anyone feels
that these should be released they can be released separately.
@Dominik, I hope your -1 is not a 'veto', if it is please let us know.
Otherwise I think we can continue this release vote and, as mentioned those
bundles can still be released later.
Best regards,
David
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1f870e20c5f13da6dd0995f501e9ee279a30532efa77125203307ecd@%3Cdev.aries.apache.org%3E
On 2 January 2018 at 16:17, Dominik Przybysz <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> Versions are ok, but you have still missed two bundles which also should be
> released together in this release.
> I saw your message that nothing in them wasn't changed but they shouldn't
> change - they are bundles which shade those ones you have released:
> https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-
> blueprint-bundle/pom.xml
> https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-bundle/pom.xml
>
> 2018-01-02 16:05 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon <fr...@openobject.fr>:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > François
> >
> >
> > Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> > > updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> > > The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> > > release and is thus not included in this set.
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> > > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws
> inconsistent
> > > exceptions
> > >
> > > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> > > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > > exceptions
> > > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> > >
> > > Staging repository:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > > +1 Approve the release
> > > -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > David Bosschaert
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pozdrawiam / Regards,
> Dominik Przybysz
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by Dominik Przybysz <al...@gmail.com>.
-1
Versions are ok, but you have still missed two bundles which also should be
released together in this release.
I saw your message that nothing in them wasn't changed but they shouldn't
change - they are bundles which shade those ones you have released:
https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-blueprint-bundle/pom.xml
https://github.com/apache/aries/blob/trunk/jmx/jmx-bundle/pom.xml
2018-01-02 16:05 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon <fr...@openobject.fr>:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> François
>
>
> Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> > updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> > The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> > release and is thus not included in this set.
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> > [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> > exceptions
> >
> > org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> > [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> > exceptions
> > [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >
> > Staging repository:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> > +1 Approve the release
> > -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David Bosschaert
> >
>
>
--
Pozdrawiam / Regards,
Dominik Przybysz
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by Francois Papon <fr...@openobject.fr>.
+1 (non-binding)
François
Le 02/01/2018 à 17:10, David Bosschaert a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> release and is thus not included in this set.
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>
> Please vote:
>
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Here's my +1
David
On 2 January 2018 at 13:10, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> release and is thus not included in this set.
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>
> Please vote:
>
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net>.
+1
Christian
2018-01-09 11:59 GMT+01:00 David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to finish this release, but we need one more binding vote. As
> discussed we Dominik, the uber-bundles will not be released any more, and I
> can remove them from SVN going forward.
>
> @PMC members, please cast a vote so we can close this off?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David
>
> On 7 January 2018 at 12:28, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone else voting? We need one more binding vote...
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > David
> >
> > On 4 January 2018 at 06:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in
> >> Karaf, but not a big deal).
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> >>> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> >>> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> >>> release and is thus not included in this set.
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> >>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> >>> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws
> inconsistent
> >>> exceptions
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> >>> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> >>> exceptions
> >>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
> >>>
> >>> Staging repository:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
> >>>
> >>> Please vote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 Approve the release
> >>> -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
> >>>
> >>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> David Bosschaert
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I'd like to finish this release, but we need one more binding vote. As
discussed we Dominik, the uber-bundles will not be released any more, and I
can remove them from SVN going forward.
@PMC members, please cast a vote so we can close this off?
Many thanks,
David
On 7 January 2018 at 12:28, David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Anyone else voting? We need one more binding vote...
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 4 January 2018 at 06:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in
>> Karaf, but not a big deal).
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
>>> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
>>> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
>>> release and is thus not included in this set.
>>>
>>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
>>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
>>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>>>
>>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
>>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
>>> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
>>> exceptions
>>>
>>> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
>>> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
>>> exceptions
>>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>>>
>>> Staging repository:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>>
>>> +1 Approve the release
>>> -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> David Bosschaert
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Anyone else voting? We need one more binding vote...
Cheers,
David
On 4 January 2018 at 06:29, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in
> Karaf, but not a big deal).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
>> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
>> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
>> release and is thus not included in this set.
>>
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>>
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
>> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
>> exceptions
>>
>> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
>> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
>> exceptions
>> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>>
>> Staging repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>>
>> Please vote:
>>
>> +1 Approve the release
>> -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> David Bosschaert
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Aries JMX components (take 2)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Agree to not release uber bundles anymore (it's some changes to do in Karaf, but
not a big deal).
Regards
JB
On 01/02/2018 02:10 PM, David Bosschaert wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm calling a vote on various Aries JMX components, now with versions
> updated from 1.2 to 1.2.0.
> The org.apache.aries.jmx.api component has not changed since the last
> release and is thus not included in this set.
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core version 1.1.8
> org.apache.aries.jmx.core.whiteboard version 1.1.6
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.api version 1.2.0
> org.apache.aries.jmx.blueprint.core version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1707] BlueprintMetadata.getBlueprintContainer throws inconsistent
> exceptions
>
> org.apache.aries.jmx.whiteboard version 1.2.0
> [ARIES-1766] Configure log severity for Whiteboard JMX registration
> exceptions
> [ARIES-1630] jmx core fails if configadmin is not present
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-1123
>
> Please vote:
>
> +1 Approve the release
> -1 Do not approve the release (please explain why)
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David Bosschaert
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com