Re: Suggestion for PROPPATCH with simple-server

[Angela Schreiber <an...@day.com>]

hi

Brian Moseley wrote:
>>I guess this would meet the requirements for those
>>expecting a webDAV server that is (as a first step)
>>not limited regarding PROPPATCH. Second it would
>>allow to have a handling of property modifications
>>which is specific for individual resource types instead
>>of trying to set all properties to the uppermost node.

> seems like a reasonable approach. i think it's important to continue
> to store the encoding, media type and last modified timestamp for the
> resource even if the underlying node type does not explicitly require
> those jcr properties, but assuming that's done, i'm +1.

sure. i don't want to get rid of them.
Maybe i even prefer not to modify the 'DefaultHandler' but
instead change the manager (explicitely setting the nodetypes
while adding the DefaultHandler).

Regarding the property handling i rather think of separate interfaces
and adjusting the implementations present than modifying the existing 
IOHandler/IOManager interfaces.

regards
angela