You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Sam Ruby <ru...@us.ibm.com> on 2001/03/23 13:47:19 UTC
Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Jetspeed
Santiago Gala wrote:
>
> > <http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-jetspeed.html>
>
> BTW, we need the functionality in ExtendedProperties, I hope it
> is still somewhere. Also, turbine people should deprecate this
> kind of classes before removal during at least a couple of weeks
> to avoid things failing like this.
+1
- Sam Ruby
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Jetspeed
Posted by Santiago Gala <sg...@hisitech.com>.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Santiago Gala wrote:
>>
>>>> <http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-jetspeed.html>
>>>
>>> BTW, we need the functionality in ExtendedProperties, I hope it
>>> is still somewhere. Also, turbine people should deprecate this
>>> kind of classes before removal during at least a couple of weeks
>>> to avoid things failing like this.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
>
> That one's my fault. I will go the way of deprecation from now on :-)
While there is no official turbine release, it could be a good idea to
use the tdk aXX as synchronization points. We are tracking those
releases in Jetspeed. They offer a pointer to a stable turbine code base
for a month :)
You could have something like:
major interface changes are deprecated during a full release cycle of
tdk, and then killed.
Obviously, there will be cases where this desirable goal cannot be
followed. For instance, changing a class to a interface is impossible to
do this way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Jetspeed
Posted by Santiago Gala <sg...@hisitech.com>.
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Sam Ruby wrote:
>
>> Santiago Gala wrote:
>>
>>>>
<http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-jetspeed.html>
>>>
>>> BTW, we need the functionality in ExtendedProperties, I hope it
>>> is still somewhere. Also, turbine people should deprecate this
>>> kind of classes before removal during at least a couple of weeks
>>> to avoid things failing like this.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
>
> That one's my fault. I will go the way of deprecation from now on :-)
While there is no official turbine release, it could be a good idea to
use the tdk aXX as synchronization points. We are tracking those
releases in Jetspeed. They offer a pointer to a stable turbine code base
for a month :)
You could have something like:
major interface changes are deprecated during a full release cycle of
tdk, and then killed.
Obviously, there will be cases where this desirable goal cannot be
followed. For instance, changing a class to a interface is impossible to
do this way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Jetspeed
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@apache.org>.
Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Santiago Gala wrote:
> >
> > > <http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-jetspeed.html>
> >
> > BTW, we need the functionality in ExtendedProperties, I hope it
> > is still somewhere. Also, turbine people should deprecate this
> > kind of classes before removal during at least a couple of weeks
> > to avoid things failing like this.
>
> +1
>
> - Sam Ruby
That one's my fault. I will go the way of deprecation from now on :-)
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.com
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://tambora.zenplex.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Jetspeed
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@apache.org>.
Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Santiago Gala wrote:
> >
> > > <http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-03-23/jakarta-jetspeed.html>
> >
> > BTW, we need the functionality in ExtendedProperties, I hope it
> > is still somewhere. Also, turbine people should deprecate this
> > kind of classes before removal during at least a couple of weeks
> > to avoid things failing like this.
>
> +1
>
> - Sam Ruby
That one's my fault. I will go the way of deprecation from now on :-)
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.com
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://tambora.zenplex.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org