You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2007/01/30 20:41:55 UTC
MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does
anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if
it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta?
Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)?
Joe
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joe, I've asked a couple questions on the MyFaces devlist tonight to
hopefully address some of your questions. First, I've asked for assistance
getting my local MyFaces build working again (so we can at least have
something to start using for TCK testing). And secondly I've asked for a
rough estimate for where they think they are in their JSR-252
implementation. Hopefully this will help shed some light. I'll post
responses as soon as I get anything. Thanks.
Joe Bohn wrote:
> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
> about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does
> anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if
> it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta?
>
> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)?
>
> Joe
>
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
that's not my duty ;)
On 2/24/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> This is done, I've dropped the local repo and did a full clean build
> and it appears to be happy.
>
> Now if we could just get rid of the other module local repos ;-)
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
>
> > Excellent! Thanks for your help on this. After dealing with some
> > tough build issues over the past couple of months we are trying to
> > minimize the complexity of Geronimo's build environment. Picking up
> > MyFaces drivers from the snapshot repo instead of a localized repo in
> > Geronimo's src tree will be a big help.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> soon...
> >>
> >> our continuum "root" account is locked...
> >> my own account isn't able to change the goals from
> >> clean install
> >>
> >> to
> >> clean install source:jar deploy
> >>
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> I'll keep you posted on the progress
> >>
> >> -M
> >>
> >> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> >> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> >> > > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> >> > > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
> >> >
> >> > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access
> >> to G-
> >> > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
> >> > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
> >> >
> >> > --jason
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matthias Wessendorf
> >> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >>
> >> further stuff:
> >> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> >> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
This is done, I've dropped the local repo and did a full clean build
and it appears to be happy.
Now if we could just get rid of the other module local repos ;-)
--jason
On Feb 23, 2007, at 9:03 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
> Excellent! Thanks for your help on this. After dealing with some
> tough build issues over the past couple of months we are trying to
> minimize the complexity of Geronimo's build environment. Picking up
> MyFaces drivers from the snapshot repo instead of a localized repo in
> Geronimo's src tree will be a big help.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> soon...
>>
>> our continuum "root" account is locked...
>> my own account isn't able to change the goals from
>> clean install
>>
>> to
>> clean install source:jar deploy
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> I'll keep you posted on the progress
>>
>> -M
>>
>> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
>> > > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
>> > >
>> > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
>> > > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
>> >
>> > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access
>> to G-
>> > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
>> > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
>> >
>> > --jason
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>>
>> further stuff:
>> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Excellent! Thanks for your help on this. After dealing with some
tough build issues over the past couple of months we are trying to
minimize the complexity of Geronimo's build environment. Picking up
MyFaces drivers from the snapshot repo instead of a localized repo in
Geronimo's src tree will be a big help.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 2/23/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> soon...
>
> our continuum "root" account is locked...
> my own account isn't able to change the goals from
> clean install
>
> to
> clean install source:jar deploy
>
>
> ...
>
> I'll keep you posted on the progress
>
> -M
>
> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> > > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
> > >
> > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> > > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
> >
> > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G-
> > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
> > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Cool! I imagine its done now... so we can remove our local myfaces
1.2.0-SNAPSHOT artifacts :-)
Thanks!
--jason
On Feb 24, 2007, at 6:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Jason,
>
> continuum is right now building and deploying to this m2_repo:
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/
>
> HTH,
> Matthias
>
> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Why do you need to wait for continuum for this? Why not simply
>> deploy the snaps by hand so we can start to consume them now from the
>> std repo?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>> > soon...
>> >
>> > our continuum "root" account is locked...
>> > my own account isn't able to change the goals from
>> > clean install
>> >
>> > to
>> > clean install source:jar deploy
>> >
>> >
>> > ...
>> >
>> > I'll keep you posted on the progress
>> >
>> > -M
>> >
>> > On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> >> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> >> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
>> >> > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
>> >> >
>> >> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
>> >> > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
>> >>
>> >> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access
>> >> to G-
>> >> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
>> >> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
>> >>
>> >> --jason
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matthias Wessendorf
>> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>> >
>> > further stuff:
>> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
>> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Jason,
continuum is right now building and deploying to this m2_repo:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/
HTH,
Matthias
On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Why do you need to wait for continuum for this? Why not simply
> deploy the snaps by hand so we can start to consume them now from the
> std repo?
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
> > soon...
> >
> > our continuum "root" account is locked...
> > my own account isn't able to change the goals from
> > clean install
> >
> > to
> > clean install source:jar deploy
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I'll keep you posted on the progress
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> >> > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
> >> >
> >> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> >> > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
> >>
> >> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access
> >> to G-
> >> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
> >> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
> >>
> >> --jason
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Why do you need to wait for continuum for this? Why not simply
deploy the snaps by hand so we can start to consume them now from the
std repo?
--jason
On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:52 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> soon...
>
> our continuum "root" account is locked...
> my own account isn't able to change the goals from
> clean install
>
> to
> clean install source:jar deploy
>
>
> ...
>
> I'll keep you posted on the progress
>
> -M
>
> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
>> > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
>> >
>> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
>> > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
>>
>> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access
>> to G-
>> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
>> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
soon...
our continuum "root" account is locked...
my own account isn't able to change the goals from
clean install
to
clean install source:jar deploy
...
I'll keep you posted on the progress
-M
On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
> >
> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
>
> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G-
> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
>
> --jason
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
keep me posted, guys.
time by time I am reading mails here...
On 2/23/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, a MyFaces representative could definitely gather some very useful
> information by joining Geronimo's TCK list. Like Jason says the
> Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for
> ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion
> will be resolved very soon.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> > On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> > > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
> > >
> > > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> > > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
> >
> > The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G-
> > TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
> > hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
> >
> > --jason
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
I think the overall process is pretty much worked out now. You can
start the process by sending a note to the Geronimo PMC (private@)
requesting access to the TCK with a quick summary of your goals.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/2/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for
> > ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion
> > will be resolved very soon.
>
>
> any news here ?
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
> Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for
> ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion
> will be resolved very soon.
any news here ?
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
Yes, a MyFaces representative could definitely gather some very useful
information by joining Geronimo's TCK list. Like Jason says the
Geronimo PMC is currently discussing general access to this list for
ASF committers who have signed the NDA, and I expect that discussion
will be resolved very soon.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> > figured out, during runing the TCK ?
> >
> > Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> > (I signed the NDA already in the past)
>
> The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G-
> TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
> hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
>
> --jason
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
On Feb 23, 2007, at 3:27 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
> figured out, during runing the TCK ?
>
> Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
> (I signed the NDA already in the past)
The G PMC is currently working out what the policy is for access to G-
TCK resources for non-G commiters (who have signed the ASF NDA),
hopefully will have a resolution on this soonish ;-)
--jason
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I am member of the myfaces team. Do you have already some issues
figured out, during runing the TCK ?
Also, what is the address for subscribing to your TCK list?
(I signed the NDA already in the past)
Thanks,
Matthias
On 2/1/07, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I agree with the goal and it sounds like things are nearly there ... so
> I think it makes sense to stick with MyFaces. I appreciate your work on
> this and their willingness to help us out too. Hopefully we will have a
> MyFaces release soon. Is there are target date they are working toward?
> Should we have a date in mind where we might consider alternatives if
> we don't have what is needed?
>
> Joe
>
>
> Tim McConnell wrote:
> > Hi Joe, the latest status I've received from their devlist is that they
> > are very close to running the TCK on their JSF 1.2 implementation....
> > There are some stumbling blocks though, but I think we should give them
> > the benefit of the doubt and continue to work with them and continue to
> > assume that MyFaces is what we'll use in Geronimo. I'd rather not choose
> > another alternative until we are absolutely positive that MyFaces is not
> > going to deliver.
> >
> > Joe Bohn wrote:
> >> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
> >> about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does
> >> anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if
> >> it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta?
> >>
> >> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
> >> glassfish)?
> >>
> >> Joe
> >>
> >
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
I agree with the goal and it sounds like things are nearly there ... so
I think it makes sense to stick with MyFaces. I appreciate your work on
this and their willingness to help us out too. Hopefully we will have a
MyFaces release soon. Is there are target date they are working toward?
Should we have a date in mind where we might consider alternatives if
we don't have what is needed?
Joe
Tim McConnell wrote:
> Hi Joe, the latest status I've received from their devlist is that they
> are very close to running the TCK on their JSF 1.2 implementation....
> There are some stumbling blocks though, but I think we should give them
> the benefit of the doubt and continue to work with them and continue to
> assume that MyFaces is what we'll use in Geronimo. I'd rather not choose
> another alternative until we are absolutely positive that MyFaces is not
> going to deliver.
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
>> about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does
>> anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if
>> it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta?
>>
>> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
>> glassfish)?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joe, the latest status I've received from their devlist is that they are
very close to running the TCK on their JSF 1.2 implementation.... There are
some stumbling blocks though, but I think we should give them the benefit
of the doubt and continue to work with them and continue to assume that
MyFaces is what we'll use in Geronimo. I'd rather not choose another
alternative until we are absolutely positive that MyFaces is not going to
deliver.
Joe Bohn wrote:
> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
> about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does
> anybody know if this will be functional soon and more specifically, if
> it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta?
>
> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)?
>
> Joe
>
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
The working version of JSF 1.2 is in:
svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/current12
Paul McMahan wrote:
> I built from core/branches/jsf12
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
>
> On 1/31/07, Don Hill <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Paul,
>>
>> Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
>>
>> Don
>>
>>
>> On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
>> > apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
>> > very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included
>> > their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
>> > to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
>> > faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the
>> > webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think
>> > that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
>> > we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
>> >
>> > Best wishes,
>> > Paul
>> >
>> > On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been
>> weeks
>> since
>> > > My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as
>> soon as
>> My
>> > > Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if
>> we're
>> > > going to do it, better now than later.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
>> about
>> > > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does
>> anybody know
>> if
>> > > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be
>> functional
>> > > in time for our 2.0 beta?
>> > >
>> > > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
>> glassfish)?
>> > >
>> > > Joe
>> > >
>> > > -sachin
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
Thanks,
Tim McConnell
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
I built from core/branches/jsf12
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/31/07, Don Hill <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
>
> Don
>
>
> On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan < paulmcmahan@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
> > apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
> > very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included
> > their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
> > to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
> > faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the
> > webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think
> > that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
> > we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Paul
> >
> > On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks
> since
> > > My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as
> My
> > > Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if
> we're
> > > going to do it, better now than later.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> > >
> > > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
> about
> > > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know
> if
> > > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be
> functional
> > > in time for our 2.0 beta?
> > >
> > > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
> glassfish)?
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > -sachin
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Don Hill <ju...@gmail.com>.
Paul,
Sorry to chime in but what branch did you build myfaces 1.2 from ?
Don
On 1/31/07, Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
> apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
> very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included
> their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
> to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
> faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the
> webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think
> that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
> we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks
> since
> > My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as
> My
> > Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if
> we're
> > going to do it, better now than later.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> >
> > I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
> about
> > MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know
> if
> > this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be
> functional
> > in time for our 2.0 beta?
> >
> > Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
> glassfish)?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > -sachin
> >
> >
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Thanks Paul. That sounds really good. I was hoping that we could stay
with Myfaces too but I was just getting concerned based upon the
comments I kept seeing. It sounds like we're closer than I thought.
Thanks,
Joe
Paul McMahan wrote:
> I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
> apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
> very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included
> their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
> to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
> faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the
> webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think
> that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
> we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
>
> Best wishes,
> Paul
>
> On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks
>> since
>> My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My
>> Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're
>> going to do it, better now than later.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list
>> about
>> MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody
>> know if
>> this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be
>> functional
>> in time for our 2.0 beta?
>>
>> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
>> glassfish)?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>> -sachin
>>
>>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
I hope that Geronimo can use Myfaces for JSF since they are also an
apache project. I successfully built their 1.2 snapshot today with
very little trouble (just disabled unit tests). Then I included
their jars in a JSF 1.2 web application and successfully deployed it
to Geronimo. The Myfaces engine successfully parsed the
faces-config.xml and started the webapp. I was able to access the
webapp from my browser and interact with the JSF controls. I think
that they are close enough to providing a usable JSF 1.2 driver that
we should continue to work with them for delivery in Geronimo 2.0.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 1/31/07, Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been weeks since
> My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap back as soon as My
> Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for the beta, and if we're
> going to do it, better now than later.
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user list about
> MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0. Does anybody know if
> this will be functional soon and more specifically, if it will be functional
> in time for our 2.0 beta?
>
> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly glassfish)?
>
> Joe
>
> -sachin
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.2 for Geronimo 2.0?
Posted by Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I think we should consider this. From what I hear its been
weeks since My Faces has been able to build. We could always swap
back as soon as My Faces provides a driver. I think we need this for
the beta, and if we're going to do it, better now than later.
On Jan 30, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> I've seen several comments in the release notes and on the user
> list about MyFaces 1.2 not yet being functional in Geronimo 2.0.
> Does anybody know if this will be functional soon and more
> specifically, if it will be functional in time for our 2.0 beta?
>
> Should we maybe be looking for an alternative for 2.0 (possibly
> glassfish)?
>
> Joe
-sachin