You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to rpc-dev@xml.apache.org by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> on 2002/06/11 00:48:59 UTC
Handler repository
Hi,
I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
them.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 13:14, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 22:57, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > > Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
> >> > related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
> >> > useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
> >> > handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
> >> > them.
> >>
> >> That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
> >> JAR as the core,
> >
> > No, I think that would be bad.
> >
> > or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
> > > source code live?
> >
> > I think a sub repo for handlers much like velocity has a sub repo for
> > tools. That's my first inclination.
>
> Okay. Then in the style of the Velocity project, how about
> xmp-rpc-tools?
Sounds good to me.
> - Dan
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Tue, 2002-06-11 at 13:14, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 22:57, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > > Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
> >> > related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
> >> > useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
> >> > handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
> >> > them.
> >>
> >> That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
> >> JAR as the core,
> >
> > No, I think that would be bad.
> >
> > or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
> > > source code live?
> >
> > I think a sub repo for handlers much like velocity has a sub repo for
> > tools. That's my first inclination.
>
> Okay. Then in the style of the Velocity project, how about
> xmp-rpc-tools?
Sounds good to me.
> - Dan
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 22:57, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>>
>> > I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
>> > related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
>> > useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
>> > handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
>> > them.
>>
>> That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
>> JAR as the core,
>
> No, I think that would be bad.
>
> or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
> > source code live?
>
> I think a sub repo for handlers much like velocity has a sub repo for
> tools. That's my first inclination.
Okay. Then in the style of the Velocity project, how about
xmp-rpc-tools?
- Dan
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 22:57, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>>
>> > I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
>> > related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
>> > useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
>> > handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
>> > them.
>>
>> That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
>> JAR as the core,
>
> No, I think that would be bad.
>
> or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
> > source code live?
>
> I think a sub repo for handlers much like velocity has a sub repo for
> tools. That's my first inclination.
Okay. Then in the style of the Velocity project, how about
xmp-rpc-tools?
- Dan
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 22:57, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>
> > I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
> > related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
> > useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
> > handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
> > them.
>
> That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
> JAR as the core,
No, I think that would be bad.
or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
> source code live?
I think a sub repo for handlers much like velocity has a sub repo for
tools. That's my first inclination.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com>.
On Mon, 2002-06-10 at 22:57, Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
>
> > I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
> > related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
> > useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
> > handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
> > them.
>
> That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
> JAR as the core,
No, I think that would be bad.
or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
> source code live?
I think a sub repo for handlers much like velocity has a sub repo for
tools. That's my first inclination.
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
jvanzyl@apache.org
http://tambora.zenplex.org
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
> related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
> useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
> handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
> them.
That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
JAR as the core, or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
source code live?
Re: Handler repository
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Jason van Zyl <jv...@zenplex.com> writes:
> I was just doing some work on the XMLRPC service in fulcrum (turbine
> related project) and we have a couple handlers in there that might be
> useful to others. I was wondering if anyone else had some reusable
> handlers, and if we should collect them somewhere in CVS so we can share
> them.
That seems very reasonable. However, should handlers live in the same
JAR as the core, or in a separate JAR? Also, where should their
source code live?