You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/11/19 22:02:43 UTC
[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1059) bad java practices which affect
performance (result of code inspection)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1059:
------------------------------------------
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> bad java practices which affect performance (result of code inspection)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1059
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1059
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tzvika Barenholz
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: inspections.diff, LUCENE-1059.take2.patch
>
>
> IntelliJ IDEA found the following issues in the Lucense source code and tests:
> 1) explicit for loops where calls to System.arraycopy() should have been
> 2) calls to Boolean constructor (in stead of the appropriate static method/field)
> 3) instantiation of unnecessary Integer instances for toString, instead of calling the static one
> 4) String concatenation using + inside a call to StringBuffer.append(), in stead of chaining the append calls
> all minor issues. patch is forthcoming.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org