You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/12/14 11:55:40 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32691] New: - Convenience methods for cleaner application code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691

           Summary: Convenience methods for cleaner application code
           Product: Commons
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows 2000
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Logging
        AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
        ReportedBy: bob.tarling@gmail.com


I wonder if the commons-logging guys could take a look at this log4j issue -
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229

If commons-logging could provide the API that Linus suggests then it would add 
cleaner logging code to our applications and allow us to continue to use Log4J 
or whatever else as the underlying logger.

I really don't know why the Log4J guys did nothing with this (even though they 
marked as fixed/resolved). It seems quite a reasonable request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org