You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/12/14 11:55:40 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32691] New: -
Convenience methods for cleaner application code
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32691
Summary: Convenience methods for cleaner application code
Product: Commons
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows 2000
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Logging
AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: bob.tarling@gmail.com
I wonder if the commons-logging guys could take a look at this log4j issue -
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16229
If commons-logging could provide the API that Linus suggests then it would add
cleaner logging code to our applications and allow us to continue to use Log4J
or whatever else as the underlying logger.
I really don't know why the Log4J guys did nothing with this (even though they
marked as fixed/resolved). It seems quite a reasonable request.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org