You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com> on 2013/04/12 02:01:14 UTC
[DISCUSS] openwebbeans-conversation module
hi @ all,
even if an application doesn't use std. cdi conversations, they introduce a
noticeable overhead for >every< request.
imo we should create an own module which is e.g. a transitive dependency of
the jsf module/s.
-> that would allow to exclude it, if you don't need std. cdi conversations.
regards,
gerhard
Re: [DISCUSS] openwebbeans-conversation module
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
+1 for Mark idea
Le 12 avr. 2013 21:25, "Gerhard Petracek" <ge...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> hi romain,
>
> it depends a lot on the page (due to the check for the link-decoration).
>
> mark had a nice idea:
> we can deactivate it, if there is no conversation-scoped bean in the
> application.
> -> +1
> in any case we can use a separated module to get rid of the duplicated
> implementation (for jsf 1.x and 2.x).
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
> 2013/4/12 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi
> >
> > What is noticeable?
> >
> > Being handle in lazy mode it should be fine
> > Le 12 avr. 2013 02:02, "Gerhard Petracek" <ge...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > hi @ all,
> > >
> > > even if an application doesn't use std. cdi conversations, they
> > introduce a
> > > noticeable overhead for >every< request.
> > > imo we should create an own module which is e.g. a transitive
> dependency
> > of
> > > the jsf module/s.
> > > -> that would allow to exclude it, if you don't need std. cdi
> > > conversations.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > gerhard
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] openwebbeans-conversation module
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi romain,
it depends a lot on the page (due to the check for the link-decoration).
mark had a nice idea:
we can deactivate it, if there is no conversation-scoped bean in the
application.
-> +1
in any case we can use a separated module to get rid of the duplicated
implementation (for jsf 1.x and 2.x).
regards,
gerhard
2013/4/12 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> What is noticeable?
>
> Being handle in lazy mode it should be fine
> Le 12 avr. 2013 02:02, "Gerhard Petracek" <ge...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > hi @ all,
> >
> > even if an application doesn't use std. cdi conversations, they
> introduce a
> > noticeable overhead for >every< request.
> > imo we should create an own module which is e.g. a transitive dependency
> of
> > the jsf module/s.
> > -> that would allow to exclude it, if you don't need std. cdi
> > conversations.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] openwebbeans-conversation module
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
What is noticeable?
Being handle in lazy mode it should be fine
Le 12 avr. 2013 02:02, "Gerhard Petracek" <ge...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> hi @ all,
>
> even if an application doesn't use std. cdi conversations, they introduce a
> noticeable overhead for >every< request.
> imo we should create an own module which is e.g. a transitive dependency of
> the jsf module/s.
> -> that would allow to exclude it, if you don't need std. cdi
> conversations.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>