You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by "Ning Zhang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/05/04 02:46:03 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-2146) Block Sampling should adjust number
of reducers accordingly to make it useful
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028532#comment-13028532 ]
Ning Zhang commented on HIVE-2146:
----------------------------------
Siying can you create a review request?
I've a couple of comments as well:
1) comment in line 387 is not complete
2) comments in line 388-389: can you give an example in which case all input alias are sampled by syntax but it actually cannot be sampled?
3) line 391: if we want to mimic the old estimation algorithm it seems we shouldn't + bytesPerReducer here? It is added in line 399 right?
> Block Sampling should adjust number of reducers accordingly to make it useful
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-2146
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-2146
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Siying Dong
> Assignee: Siying Dong
> Attachments: HIVE-2146.1.patch
>
>
> Now number of reducers of block sampling is not modified, so that queries like:
> select c from tab tablesample(1 percent) group by c;
> can generate huge number of reducers although the input is sampled to be small.
> We need to shrink number of reducers to make block sampling more useful.
> Since now number of reducers are determined before get splits, the way to do it probably is not clean enough, but we can do a good guess.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira