You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "David Handermann (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/03/14 16:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (NIFI-9645) Re-enable "Idle Connection Expiration" property in PutSplunk

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

David Handermann resolved NIFI-9645.
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.16.0
       Resolution: Fixed

> Re-enable "Idle Connection Expiration" property in PutSplunk
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-9645
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9645
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.14.0, 1.15.0, 1.15.1, 1.15.2, 1.15.3
>            Reporter: Anders
>            Assignee: Nathan Gough
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: PutSplunk
>             Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>          Time Spent: 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Creating JIRA ticket as requested by [~exceptionfactory] in https://apachenifi.slack.com/archives/C0L9VCD47/p1643633831171269
> In NiFi version 1.14.0 and later (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-8616), the "Idle Connection Expiration" property in PutSplunk is no longer used. This causes quite a bit of warning spam with "Connection reset by peer" in certain configurations:
> {code}
> 2022-01-31 16:18:17,268 WARN [PutSplunk[19dc42e1-0b51-340d-a9a6-81ad014d79e1]-41-2] o.a.nifi.processors.splunk.PutSplunk PutSplunk[id=19dc42e1-0b51-340d-a9a6-81ad014d79e1] Communication Failed with Remote Address [/1.2.3.4:12345]: java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
> java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
>         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)
>         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)
>         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:276)
>         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:233)
>         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:223)
>         at java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:356)
>         at io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBuf.setBytes(PooledByteBuf.java:253)
>         at io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:1132)
>         at io.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioSocketChannel.doReadBytes(NioSocketChannel.java:350)
>         at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:151)
>         at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:719)
>         at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:655)
>         at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:581)
>         at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:493)
>         at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:986)
>         at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
>         at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
>         at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)
> {code}
> One example where this causes this problem is when using an LB between NiFi and Splunk.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)