Re: [DISCUSS] Shall we use JIRA or Github issue to track issues?(Internet mail)

[lamber liu <la...@gmail.com>]

+1 for JIRA

On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 9:59 AM osgooli(李致波) <os...@tencent.com> wrote:

> +1 for JIRA
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: 俊平堵 <ju...@apache.org>
> 发送时间: 2019年12月25日 11:13
> 收件人: dev@tubemq.apache.org
> 主题: [DISCUSS] Shall we use JIRA or Github issue to track issues?(Internet
> mail)
>
> Hi,
>     Continue with TubeMQ's wechat group discussion, shall we use JIRA or
> Github issue to track issues for TubeMQ?
>     My recommendation is to use JIRA, for following reasons:
> 1. Most of existing Apache projects use JIRA to track issues which is more
> friendly to project management with lots of functions.
> 2. Github (and issue) is not own by Apache, so it could be more risky to
> lost history or access especially during repository migration, etc.
> 3. Existing workflow of many projects are JIRA based, and many of tubemq
> contributors/committers are from them, such as hadoop, flink, spark, hbase,
> etc. It could be more friendly to early contributor.
>      Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Junping
>