You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Forrest Xia <fo...@gmail.com> on 2012/01/06 08:48:54 UTC
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Good to see a new 5.5.x release soon :-)
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
<kn...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2011/12/21 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
> > On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>
> >> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >>>> All,
> >>>>
> >>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
> >>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
> >>>> coming weekend ;)
> >>>
> >>> +1 for middle of next week.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Fine w/ me...
> >
> > The status file is clear.
> >
> > Bugzilla is clear (!)
> >
> > I think we are good to go. I'd suggest waiting ~24 hours for folks to
> > spot anything else that needs doing and aim for a tag on Thursday.
> >
>
> 1. There was a bug report about exception when DEBUG logging is enabled.
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
>
> Already fixed in 7.0 and backports proposed.
>
> 2. I reduced one warning to info (per BZ 52184 concerns) - also proposed.
>
> Neither issue is a showstopper, but should be easy to fix.
>
>
> X. It might be interesting to backport UserDataHandler (BZ 52184) from
> TC7 to earlier versions, but I am not sure how much interest is there
> in that. It is not a showstopper, because one can configure its
> logging to take care of BZ 52184.
>
> Should be easy for 6.0. Will be more work for 5.5 (replace enums with
> int constants?). For reference, the revisions that implement this
> feature are:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212102 (initial,
> Cookies)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212110 (changelog)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213470 (JULI build
> fix)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1220297
> (catalina.policy)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224654 (API review)
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224664 (Parameters)
>
> I expect to be rather busy next week.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
--
Thanks!
Regards, Forrest
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
TC 5.5's STATUS file is clean... will wait a few hours and
unless I hear otherwise, will T&R around lunchtime.
On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> My plan is to T&R today...
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Time for 5.5.35?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
My plan is to T&R today...
On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:48 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Good to see a new 5.5.x release soon :-)
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Konstantin Kolinko
> <kn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/21 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>>> On 20/12/2011 10:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 20, 2011, at 2:42 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/2011 10:49 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know the 5.5.x change log is short but [1] is one of those annoying
>>>>>> (for me any way) bugs it would be nice to get in a fixed release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jim: Any chance of a 5.5.x tag later this week? I won't suggest this
>>>>>> coming weekend ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for middle of next week.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fine w/ me...
>>>
>>> The status file is clear.
>>>
>>> Bugzilla is clear (!)
>>>
>>> I think we are good to go. I'd suggest waiting ~24 hours for folks to
>>> spot anything else that needs doing and aim for a tag on Thursday.
>>>
>>
>> 1. There was a bug report about exception when DEBUG logging is enabled.
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52384
>>
>> Already fixed in 7.0 and backports proposed.
>>
>> 2. I reduced one warning to info (per BZ 52184 concerns) - also proposed.
>>
>> Neither issue is a showstopper, but should be easy to fix.
>>
>>
>> X. It might be interesting to backport UserDataHandler (BZ 52184) from
>> TC7 to earlier versions, but I am not sure how much interest is there
>> in that. It is not a showstopper, because one can configure its
>> logging to take care of BZ 52184.
>>
>> Should be easy for 6.0. Will be more work for 5.5 (replace enums with
>> int constants?). For reference, the revisions that implement this
>> feature are:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212102 (initial,
>> Cookies)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1212110 (changelog)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1213470 (JULI build
>> fix)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1220297
>> (catalina.policy)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224654 (API review)
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1224664 (Parameters)
>>
>> I expect to be rather busy next week.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Konstantin Kolinko
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org