You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@parquet.apache.org by Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> on 2026/07/13 17:34:30 UTC
[VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Hello everyone,
This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
Parquet as discussed
in the design document
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se>
and proposal pull request
<https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
proposal
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn>,
finalized
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se>)
as well
as the proposal pull request
<https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
syncs, and the discussion thread
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
<https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
<https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
[ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
[ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
[ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
new type!
Thanks,
Burak Yavuz
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Eduard Tudenhöfner <et...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 7:46 PM Daniel Weeks <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026, 7:34 AM Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> > Parquet as discussed
> > in the design document
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >
> > and proposal pull request
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> > proposal
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > >,
> > finalized
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >)
> > as well
> > as the proposal pull request
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> > syncs, and the discussion thread
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
> >
> > Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> >
> > [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> >
> > Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
> > new type!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Burak Yavuz
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Russell Spitzer <ru...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 12:46 PM Daniel Weeks <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026, 7:34 AM Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> > Parquet as discussed
> > in the design document
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >
> > and proposal pull request
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> > proposal
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > >,
> > finalized
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >)
> > as well
> > as the proposal pull request
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> > syncs, and the discussion thread
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
> >
> > Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> >
> > [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> >
> > Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
> > new type!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Burak Yavuz
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Daniel Weeks <dw...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
-Dan
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026, 7:34 AM Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> Parquet as discussed
> in the design document
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >
> and proposal pull request
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> proposal
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> >,
> finalized
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >)
> as well
> as the proposal pull request
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> syncs, and the discussion thread
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
>
> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
>
> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
> new type!
>
> Thanks,
> Burak Yavuz
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Alkis Evlogimenos via dev <de...@parquet.apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding). Thank you Burak for driving this.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 6:42 PM Neelesh Salian <ne...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
> Great work, Burak.
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 10:34 AM Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> > Parquet as discussed
> > in the design document
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >
> > and proposal pull request
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> > proposal
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > >,
> > finalized
> > <
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >)
> > as well
> > as the proposal pull request
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> > syncs, and the discussion thread
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
> >
> > Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> >
> > [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> >
> > Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
> > new type!
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Burak Yavuz
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Neelesh Salian <ne...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding).
Great work, Burak.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 10:34 AM Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> Parquet as discussed
> in the design document
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >
> and proposal pull request
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> proposal
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> >,
> finalized
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >)
> as well
> as the proposal pull request
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> syncs, and the discussion thread
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
>
> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
>
> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
> new type!
>
> Thanks,
> Burak Yavuz
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Kevin Liu <ke...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
Great to see this moving forward!
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 9:03 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks, Fokko
>
> On 2026/07/15 02:48:47 Gang Wu wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Happy to see we're reaching consensus on this long-awaited feature!
> >
> > I think we still need to clarify a few things in the spec where I posted
> > some comments. Overall, it looks good to go.
> >
> > Best,
> > Gang
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 4:50 AM PRATEEK GAUR <pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Prateek
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026, 12:34 PM Gunnar Morling <
> > > gunnar.morling@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > --Gunnar
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 20:38, Talat Uyarer via dev
> > > > <de...@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the late comment. In general, I am fine with the
> proposal.
> > > > > However, I would like to cover versions on Blob Storage in the FILE
> > > > type. I
> > > > > think it would be beneficial to address this because all Blob
> Storages
> > > > > support versioning. This will give us deterministic results on Blob
> > > > Storage
> > > > > paths.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:22 AM Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <
> maplewish117@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Xuwei Fu
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <
> brkyvz@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > Burak
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > > > > > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > > > > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <
> > > > brkyvz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > > > > > > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > > > > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585
> >.
> > > > > > > > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the
> design
> > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > > (first
> > > > > > > > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > > > > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > > > > >>> )
> > > > > > > > > > > >> as well
> > > > > > > > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585
> >,
> > > > biweekly
> > > > > > > > > parquet
> > > > > > > > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > > > > > > > >.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in
> parquet-java
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608>
> and
> > > > > > arrow-rs
> > > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > > > > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > > > > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and
> involvement
> > > in
> > > > > > > > developing
> > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Thanks, Fokko
On 2026/07/15 02:48:47 Gang Wu wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Happy to see we're reaching consensus on this long-awaited feature!
>
> I think we still need to clarify a few things in the spec where I posted
> some comments. Overall, it looks good to go.
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 4:50 AM PRATEEK GAUR <pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best
> > Prateek
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026, 12:34 PM Gunnar Morling <
> > gunnar.morling@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > --Gunnar
> > >
> > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 20:38, Talat Uyarer via dev
> > > <de...@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for the late comment. In general, I am fine with the proposal.
> > > > However, I would like to cover versions on Blob Storage in the FILE
> > > type. I
> > > > think it would be beneficial to address this because all Blob Storages
> > > > support versioning. This will give us deterministic results on Blob
> > > Storage
> > > > paths.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:22 AM Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <maplewish117@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Xuwei Fu
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Burak
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > > > > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > > > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <
> > > brkyvz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > > > > > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > > > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > > > > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design
> > > > > documents
> > > > > > > > (first
> > > > > > > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > > > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > > > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > > > >>> )
> > > > > > > > > > >> as well
> > > > > > > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>,
> > > biweekly
> > > > > > > > parquet
> > > > > > > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > > > > > > >.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and
> > > > > arrow-rs
> > > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > > > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > > > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement
> > in
> > > > > > > developing
> > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Gang Wu <us...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Happy to see we're reaching consensus on this long-awaited feature!
I think we still need to clarify a few things in the spec where I posted
some comments. Overall, it looks good to go.
Best,
Gang
On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 4:50 AM PRATEEK GAUR <pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best
> Prateek
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026, 12:34 PM Gunnar Morling <
> gunnar.morling@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > --Gunnar
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 20:38, Talat Uyarer via dev
> > <de...@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Sorry for the late comment. In general, I am fine with the proposal.
> > > However, I would like to cover versions on Blob Storage in the FILE
> > type. I
> > > think it would be beneficial to address this because all Blob Storages
> > > support versioning. This will give us deterministic results on Blob
> > Storage
> > > paths.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:22 AM Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <maplewish117@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Xuwei Fu
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Burak
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > > > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <
> > brkyvz@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > > > > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > > > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design
> > > > documents
> > > > > > > (first
> > > > > > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > > >>> )
> > > > > > > > > >> as well
> > > > > > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>,
> > biweekly
> > > > > > > parquet
> > > > > > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > > > > > >.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and
> > > > arrow-rs
> > > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement
> in
> > > > > > developing
> > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by PRATEEK GAUR <pr...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Best
Prateek
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026, 12:34 PM Gunnar Morling <gu...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> --Gunnar
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 20:38, Talat Uyarer via dev
> <de...@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Sorry for the late comment. In general, I am fine with the proposal.
> > However, I would like to cover versions on Blob Storage in the FILE
> type. I
> > think it would be beneficial to address this because all Blob Storages
> > support versioning. This will give us deterministic results on Blob
> Storage
> > paths.
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:22 AM Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <ma...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Xuwei Fu
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Burak
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <
> brkyvz@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > > > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design
> > > documents
> > > > > > (first
> > > > > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > > >>> )
> > > > > > > > >> as well
> > > > > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>,
> biweekly
> > > > > > parquet
> > > > > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > > > > >> <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > > > > >.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and
> > > arrow-rs
> > > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in
> > > > > developing
> > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Gunnar Morling <gu...@googlemail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
--Gunnar
On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 20:38, Talat Uyarer via dev
<de...@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Sorry for the late comment. In general, I am fine with the proposal.
> However, I would like to cover versions on Blob Storage in the FILE type. I
> think it would be beneficial to address this because all Blob Storages
> support versioning. This will give us deterministic results on Blob Storage
> paths.
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:22 AM Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <ma...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Xuwei Fu
> > > >
> > > > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> > > >
> > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Burak
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design
> > documents
> > > > > (first
> > > > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > > >>> )
> > > > > > > >> as well
> > > > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly
> > > > > parquet
> > > > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > > > >> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > > > >.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and
> > arrow-rs
> > > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in
> > > > developing
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Talat Uyarer via dev <de...@parquet.apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
Sorry for the late comment. In general, I am fine with the proposal.
However, I would like to cover versions on Blob Storage in the FILE type. I
think it would be beneficial to address this because all Blob Storages
support versioning. This will give us deterministic results on Blob Storage
paths.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 3:22 AM Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Xuwei Fu
> > >
> > > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Burak
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > > in
> > > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design
> documents
> > > > (first
> > > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > > >>> )
> > > > > > >> as well
> > > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly
> > > > parquet
> > > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > > >> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > > >.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and
> arrow-rs
> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in
> > > developing
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Ed Seidl <et...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
On 2026/07/14 10:09:41 Andrew Lamb wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > Best,
> > Xuwei Fu
> >
> > Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> >
> > > +1 non-binding
> > >
> > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Burak
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > > in
> > > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > > >> in the design document
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents
> > > (first
> > > > > >> proposal
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > > >>> ,
> > > > > >> finalized
> > > > > >> <
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > > >>> )
> > > > > >> as well
> > > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly
> > > parquet
> > > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> > >.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in
> > developing
> > > > > this
> > > > > >> new type!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 6:04 AM wish maple <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
> Best,
> Xuwei Fu
>
> Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Burak
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> > LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > > in
> > > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > > >> in the design document
> > > > >> <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents
> > (first
> > > > >> proposal
> > > > >> <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > > >>> ,
> > > > >> finalized
> > > > >> <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > > >>> )
> > > > >> as well
> > > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly
> > parquet
> > > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy
> >.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in
> developing
> > > > this
> > > > >> new type!
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by wish maple <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding
Best,
Xuwei Fu
Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com> 于2026年7月14日周二 17:32写道：
> +1 non-binding
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
> >
> > Best,
> > Burak
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> > amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new
> LogicalTypeAnnotation
> > in
> > > >> Parquet as discussed
> > > >> in the design document
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > >>>
> > > >> and proposal pull request
> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents
> (first
> > > >> proposal
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > > >>> ,
> > > >> finalized
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > > >>> )
> > > >> as well
> > > >> as the proposal pull request
> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly
> parquet
> > > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
> > > >>
> > > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > > >>
> > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing
> > > this
> > > >> new type!
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Burak Yavuz
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@cloudera.com>.
+1 non-binding
On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 at 19:55, Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
>
> Best,
> Burak
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
> amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> > dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello everyone,
> > >>
> > >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation
> in
> > >> Parquet as discussed
> > >> in the design document
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >>>
> > >> and proposal pull request
> > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> > >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> > >> proposal
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> > >>> ,
> > >> finalized
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> > >>> )
> > >> as well
> > >> as the proposal pull request
> > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> > >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
> > >>
> > >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> > >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> > >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> > >>
> > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> > >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> > >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> > >>
> > >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing
> > this
> > >> new type!
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Burak Yavuz
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com>.
Adding my +1 as well (non-binding)!
Best,
Burak
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 11:29 AM Anurag Mantripragada <
amantripragada@apple.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <
> dev@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> >> Parquet as discussed
> >> in the design document
> >> <
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >>>
> >> and proposal pull request
> >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> >> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> >> proposal
> >> <
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> >>> ,
> >> finalized
> >> <
> >>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >>> )
> >> as well
> >> as the proposal pull request
> >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> >> syncs, and the discussion thread
> >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
> >>
> >> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> >> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> >> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
> >>
> >> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> >> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> >> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
> >>
> >> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing
> this
> >> new type!
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Burak Yavuz
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Anurag Mantripragada <am...@apple.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
> On Jul 13, 2026, at 11:14 AM, Divjot Arora via dev <de...@parquet.apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
>> Parquet as discussed
>> in the design document
>> <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
>>>
>> and proposal pull request
>> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
>> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
>> proposal
>> <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
>>> ,
>> finalized
>> <
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
>>> )
>> as well
>> as the proposal pull request
>> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
>> syncs, and the discussion thread
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
>>
>> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
>> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
>> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
>> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
>> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
>>
>> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
>> new type!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Burak Yavuz
>>
Re: [VOTE] Introducing a new “File” logical type to Parquet
Posted by Divjot Arora via dev <de...@parquet.apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Jul 13, 2026 at 19:34 Burak Yavuz <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> This is a vote to add support for FILE as a new LogicalTypeAnnotation in
> Parquet as discussed
> in the design document
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >
> and proposal pull request
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>.
> We’ve had extensive discussions on this in the design documents (first
> proposal
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.k8qyue4jj4rn
> >,
> finalized
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AiwrstqkwkBoOZqgOkm9JGwSMcNeHyLR7EEj1CVqpZQ/edit?tab=t.81io57da7gz#heading=h.nely2c1b14se
> >)
> as well
> as the proposal pull request
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/585>, biweekly parquet
> syncs, and the discussion thread
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/od9hxfssjgnmsh23o18q78hszowq7pcy>.
>
> Reference implementations are available in parquet-java
> <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3608> and arrow-rs
> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10109>.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Add the new FileType to the Parquet spec
> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
> [ ] -1: Do not add FileType to Parquet
>
> Thank you for all the feedback, input, and involvement in developing this
> new type!
>
> Thanks,
> Burak Yavuz
>