You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Aaron T. Myers (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/03/05 19:50:45 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HDFS-1726) query method for what kind of safe
mode the Namenode is in
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13003023#comment-13003023 ]
Aaron T. Myers commented on HDFS-1726:
--------------------------------------
HDFS-1594 could make use of the proposed SAFEMODE_AUTOMATIC status.
> query method for what kind of safe mode the Namenode is in
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-1726
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1726
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0
> Reporter: Matt Foley
> Assignee: Matt Foley
> Fix For: 0.23.0
>
>
> If we could differentiate between "startup safemode" vs other safemode, it would be easier to do startup optimizations like HDFS-1295. Looking at FSNamesystem, this can be queried, but not with a single query, and the semantics are not reliable under future changes. Also, the FSNamesystem code itself, internally, uses more than one way to test for manual safe mode.
> Proposal is to create a status field and query method in FSNamesystem with enum values
> {NOT_IN_SAFEMODE, SAFEMODE_STARTUP, SAFEMODE_EXTENSION, SAFEMODE_MANUAL}
> If in the future we add automatic fallback to safe mode, we would add value SAFEMODE_AUTOMATIC.
> This change will make it easier to do startup optimizations, and will also allow making the safemode management code in FSNamesystem simpler and more consistent.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira