You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@synapse.apache.org by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com> on 2008/05/22 18:24:05 UTC
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
If there is no objection, I would like to change these ports effective from
1.7 release onwards (fixed for the 1.7 release as well).
I am already in the process of registering these ports with IANA.
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I think we better call a proper vote for this, What do you think Paul?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Upul Godage <up...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Right now Synapse uses the ports, HTTP port 8080 and HTTPS port 8443 by
>> > default. When Synapse is running with other applications such as Tomcat
>> > servers etc. users have to change either one of these applications when
>> > there is a conflict. It would be better if we use two unused ports for
>> > Synapse by default.
>> >
>> > The following two ports are suggested to be used as Synapse default
>> ports,
>> > and get them registered for Synapse.
>> >
>> > HTTP 8282
>> > HTTPS 4433
>> >
>> >
>> > Upul
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Fremantle
>> Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
>> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>>
>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> paul@wso2.com
>>
>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Oooooppppsssee......
Yeah of course 1.2 :-)
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think you mean the 1.2 release :)
>
> Yes I'm +1.
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > If there is no objection, I would like to change these ports effective
> from
> > 1.7 release onwards (fixed for the 1.7 release as well).
> >
> > I am already in the process of registering these ports with IANA.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think we better call a proper vote for this, What do you think Paul?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ruwan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Upul Godage <up...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> >
> >>> > Right now Synapse uses the ports, HTTP port 8080 and HTTPS port 8443
> by
> >>> > default. When Synapse is running with other applications such as
> Tomcat
> >>> > servers etc. users have to change either one of these applications
> when
> >>> > there is a conflict. It would be better if we use two unused ports
> for
> >>> > Synapse by default.
> >>> >
> >>> > The following two ports are suggested to be used as Synapse default
> >>> ports,
> >>> > and get them registered for Synapse.
> >>> >
> >>> > HTTP 8282
> >>> > HTTPS 4433
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Upul
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Paul Fremantle
> >>> Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
> >>> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> >>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> >>>
> >>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> >>> paul@wso2.com
> >>>
> >>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ruwan Linton
> >> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
These two ports seem to fit the most for synapse and I have created a JIRA
to change these ports for the 1.2 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-326
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@skynet.be>
wrote:
> +1 for 8280 and 8243
>
> Andreas
>
> On 23 May 2008, at 16:45, Ruwan Linton wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as https
> :-)
>
> What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there who
> knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there default port?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >43 suffix
>> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
>> HTTP 8280
>> HTTPS 8243
>>
>> --Mark
>>
>> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL
>> and
>> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
>> enough), please add them, with references, to the
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
>> > reply,
>> >
>> > Cc:ing dev list
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ruwan
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>> > >
>> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>> > >
>> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Ruwan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Ruwan
>> > >>
>> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> > >> assignment:
>> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>> > >>
>> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but
>> for
>> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take
>> all
>> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
>> > >>
>> > >> Paul
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <
>> ruwan.linton@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
>> > not
>> > >> > registered.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
>> > about
>> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
>> > ports
>> > >> end
>> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
>> > https
>> > >> > port :-)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > WDYT?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <
>> eric.hubert@jamba.net>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> > >> choices.
>> > >> >> Or
>> > >> >> > others.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Ruwan Linton
>> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Paul Fremantle
>> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>> > >>
>> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> > >> paul@wso2.com
>> > >>
>> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Ruwan Linton
>> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
>
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
These two ports seem to fit the most for synapse and I have created a JIRA
to change these ports for the 1.2 release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNAPSE-326
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Andreas Veithen <an...@skynet.be>
wrote:
> +1 for 8280 and 8243
>
> Andreas
>
> On 23 May 2008, at 16:45, Ruwan Linton wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as https
> :-)
>
> What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there who
> knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there default port?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> >43 suffix
>> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
>> HTTP 8280
>> HTTPS 8243
>>
>> --Mark
>>
>> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL
>> and
>> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
>> enough), please add them, with references, to the
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
>> > reply,
>> >
>> > Cc:ing dev list
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ruwan
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>> > >
>> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>> > >
>> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Ruwan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Ruwan
>> > >>
>> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> > >> assignment:
>> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>> > >>
>> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but
>> for
>> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take
>> all
>> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
>> > >>
>> > >> Paul
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <
>> ruwan.linton@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
>> > not
>> > >> > registered.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
>> > about
>> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
>> > ports
>> > >> end
>> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
>> > https
>> > >> > port :-)
>> > >> >
>> > >> > WDYT?
>> > >> >
>> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <
>> eric.hubert@jamba.net>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> > >> choices.
>> > >> >> Or
>> > >> >> > others.
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Ruwan Linton
>> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Paul Fremantle
>> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>> > >>
>> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> > >> paul@wso2.com
>> > >>
>> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Ruwan Linton
>> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
>
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@skynet.be>.
+1 for 8280 and 8243
Andreas
On 23 May 2008, at 16:45, Ruwan Linton wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as
> https :-)
>
> What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there
> who knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there
> default port?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <mark.carranza@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >43 suffix
> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
> HTTP 8280
> HTTPS 8243
>
> --Mark
>
> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows
> OpenSSL and
> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used
> often
> enough), please add them, with references, to the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my
> original
> > reply,
> >
> > Cc:ing dev list
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.linton@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
> > >
> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
> > >
> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruwan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ruwan
> > >>
> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as
> official
> > >> assignment:
> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
> > >>
> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage
> you to
> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that
> Apache
> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote,
> but for
> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally
> "binding
> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting
> still is
> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a
> "count"
> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we
> take all
> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
> > >>
> > >> Paul
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.linton@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> > >> >
> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that
> 4433 is
> > not
> > >> > registered.
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change
> it, how
> > about
> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and
> https)
> > ports
> > >> end
> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the
> default
> > https
> > >> > port :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > WDYT?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <eric.hubert@jamba.net
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be
> better
> > >> choices.
> > >> >> Or
> > >> >> > others.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Ruwan Linton
> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Paul Fremantle
> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >>
> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> > >> paul@wso2.com
> > >>
> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ruwan Linton
> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@skynet.be>.
+1 for 8280 and 8243
Andreas
On 23 May 2008, at 16:45, Ruwan Linton wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as
> https :-)
>
> What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there
> who knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there
> default port?
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <mark.carranza@gmail.com
> > wrote:
> >43 suffix
> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
> HTTP 8280
> HTTPS 8243
>
> --Mark
>
> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows
> OpenSSL and
> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used
> often
> enough), please add them, with references, to the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my
> original
> > reply,
> >
> > Cc:ing dev list
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.linton@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
> > >
> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
> > >
> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruwan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ruwan
> > >>
> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as
> official
> > >> assignment:
> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
> > >>
> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage
> you to
> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that
> Apache
> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote,
> but for
> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally
> "binding
> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting
> still is
> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a
> "count"
> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we
> take all
> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
> > >>
> > >> Paul
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.linton@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> > >> >
> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that
> 4433 is
> > not
> > >> > registered.
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change
> it, how
> > about
> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and
> https)
> > ports
> > >> end
> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the
> default
> > https
> > >> > port :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > WDYT?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <eric.hubert@jamba.net
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be
> better
> > >> choices.
> > >> >> Or
> > >> >> > others.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Ruwan Linton
> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Paul Fremantle
> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >>
> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> > >> paul@wso2.com
> > >>
> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ruwan Linton
> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark,
I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as https
:-)
What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there who
knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there default port?
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >43 suffix
> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
> HTTP 8280
> HTTPS 8243
>
> --Mark
>
> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL
> and
> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
> enough), please add them, with references, to the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
> > reply,
> >
> > Cc:ing dev list
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
> > >
> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
> > >
> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruwan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ruwan
> > >>
> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
> > >> assignment:
> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
> > >>
> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
> > >>
> > >> Paul
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.linton@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> > >> >
> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
> > not
> > >> > registered.
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
> > about
> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
> > ports
> > >> end
> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
> > https
> > >> > port :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > WDYT?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <
> eric.hubert@jamba.net>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
> > >> choices.
> > >> >> Or
> > >> >> > others.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Ruwan Linton
> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Paul Fremantle
> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >>
> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> > >> paul@wso2.com
> > >>
> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ruwan Linton
> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark,
I think 8280 sounds good too. I am OK with 8280 as http and 8243 as https
:-)
What do others think about this? and also is there any one out there who
knows the port 8280 being widely used in any product as there default port?
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >43 suffix
> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
> HTTP 8280
> HTTPS 8243
>
> --Mark
>
> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL
> and
> it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
> enough), please add them, with references, to the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
> > reply,
> >
> > Cc:ing dev list
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
> > >
> > > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
> > >
> > > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruwan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ruwan
> > >>
> > >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
> > >> assignment:
> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
> > >>
> > >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
> > >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
> > >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
> > >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
> > >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
> > >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
> > >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
> > >> the input of the community, binding or not.
> > >>
> > >> Paul
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ruwan.linton@gmail.com
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> > >> >
> > >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
> > not
> > >> > registered.
> > >> >
> > >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
> > about
> > >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
> > ports
> > >> end
> > >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
> > https
> > >> > port :-)
> > >> >
> > >> > WDYT?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <
> eric.hubert@jamba.net>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> > >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
> > >> choices.
> > >> >> Or
> > >> >> > others.
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Ruwan Linton
> > >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Paul Fremantle
> > >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> > >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> > >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> > >>
> > >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> > >> paul@wso2.com
> > >>
> > >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ruwan Linton
> > > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>.
>OpenSSL, 4443 => 4433
Oops, typo, and off-topic but: I've seen 4443 and 4343 widely used for
alternate SSL ports. I believe 4433 is OpenSLL's default install port.
Evidence of confusion to avoid, but point already taken...
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >43 suffix
> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
> HTTP 8280
> HTTPS 8243
>
> --Mark
>
> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL
> and it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
> enough), please add them, with references, to the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
>> reply,
>>
>> Cc:ing dev list
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ruwan
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>> >
>> > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>> >
>> > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ruwan
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ruwan
>> >>
>> >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> >> assignment:
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>> >>
>> >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
>> >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
>> >> the input of the community, binding or not.
>> >>
>> >> Paul
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> >> >
>> >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
>> not
>> >> > registered.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
>> about
>> >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
>> ports
>> >> end
>> >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
>> https
>> >> > port :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > WDYT?
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <eric.hubert@jamba.net
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> >> choices.
>> >> >> Or
>> >> >> > others.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Ruwan Linton
>> >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Paul Fremantle
>> >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>> >>
>> >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> >> paul@wso2.com
>> >>
>> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ruwan Linton
>> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>>
>
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>.
>OpenSSL, 4443 => 4433
Oops, typo, and off-topic but: I've seen 4443 and 4343 widely used for
alternate SSL ports. I believe 4433 is OpenSLL's default install port.
Evidence of confusion to avoid, but point already taken...
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >43 suffix
> Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
> HTTP 8280
> HTTPS 8243
>
> --Mark
>
> (I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL
> and it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
> enough), please add them, with references, to the
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page.
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
>> reply,
>>
>> Cc:ing dev list
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ruwan
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>> >
>> > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>> >
>> > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ruwan
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ruwan
>> >>
>> >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> >> assignment:
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>> >>
>> >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
>> >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
>> >> the input of the community, binding or not.
>> >>
>> >> Paul
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> >> >
>> >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
>> not
>> >> > registered.
>> >> >
>> >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
>> about
>> >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
>> ports
>> >> end
>> >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
>> https
>> >> > port :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > WDYT?
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <eric.hubert@jamba.net
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> >> choices.
>> >> >> Or
>> >> >> > others.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Ruwan Linton
>> >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Paul Fremantle
>> >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>> >>
>> >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> >> paul@wso2.com
>> >>
>> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ruwan Linton
>> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>>
>
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>.
>43 suffix
Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
HTTP 8280
HTTPS 8243
--Mark
(I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL and
it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
enough), please add them, with references, to the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page. Thanks!
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
> reply,
>
> Cc:ing dev list
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
> >
> > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
> >
> > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Ruwan
> >>
> >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
> >> assignment:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
> >>
> >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
> >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
> >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
> >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
> >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
> >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
> >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
> >> the input of the community, binding or not.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> >> >
> >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
> not
> >> > registered.
> >> >
> >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
> about
> >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
> ports
> >> end
> >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
> https
> >> > port :-)
> >> >
> >> > WDYT?
> >> >
> >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> >> >>
> >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
> >> choices.
> >> >> Or
> >> >> > others.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ruwan Linton
> >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Paul Fremantle
> >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> >>
> >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> >> paul@wso2.com
> >>
> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>.
>43 suffix
Good idea, How about 80 suffix?:
HTTP 8280
HTTPS 8243
--Mark
(I'm buried (Founder: 1st startup, 1st month)) If someone knows OpenSSL and
it's default ports well enough (not me, but I have seen 4443 used often
enough), please add them, with references, to the
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers page. Thanks!
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
> reply,
>
> Cc:ing dev list
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
> >
> > Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
> >
> > Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Ruwan
> >>
> >> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
> >> assignment:
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
> >>
> >> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
> >> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
> >> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
> >> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
> >> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
> >> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
> >> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
> >> the input of the community, binding or not.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> >> >
> >> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is
> not
> >> > registered.
> >> >
> >> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how
> about
> >> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https)
> ports
> >> end
> >> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default
> https
> >> > port :-)
> >> >
> >> > WDYT?
> >> >
> >> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> >> >>
> >> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> >> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
> >> choices.
> >> >> Or
> >> >> > others.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ruwan Linton
> >> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Paul Fremantle
> >> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> >> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> >> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
> >>
> >> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> >> paul@wso2.com
> >>
> >> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
AW: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by "Hubert, Eric" <er...@jamba.net>.
Hi Ruwan,
ok, sounds good. I'm not aware of something well known and widely used which uses port 8243. So I'm +1 on this. ;-)
________________________________
Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original reply,
Cc:ing dev list
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
Thanks,
Ruwan
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
reply,
Cc:ing dev list
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>
> Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>
> Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ruwan
>>
>> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> assignment:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>>
>> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
>> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
>> the input of the community, binding or not.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> >
>> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is not
>> > registered.
>> >
>> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how about
>> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) ports
>> end
>> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default https
>> > port :-)
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> >>
>> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> >> >
>> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> choices.
>> >> Or
>> >> > others.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Fremantle
>> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>>
>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> paul@wso2.com
>>
>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Ooopppseee, I just realized that I missed the dev list from my original
reply,
Cc:ing dev list
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
>
> Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
>
> Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ruwan
>>
>> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
>> assignment:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>>
>> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
>> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
>> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
>> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
>> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
>> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
>> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
>> the input of the community, binding or not.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
>> >
>> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is not
>> > registered.
>> >
>> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how about
>> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) ports
>> end
>> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default https
>> > port :-)
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>> >
>> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>> >>
>> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> >> >
>> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better
>> choices.
>> >> Or
>> >> > others.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ruwan Linton
>> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Paul Fremantle
>> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
>> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>>
>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>> paul@wso2.com
>>
>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Paul, but 4433 is not listed even there.
Anyway I checked 8243 there and it seems OK.
Mark/Eric and all, what do you think about 8243 as the https port.
Thanks,
Ruwan
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ruwan
>
> This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
> assignment:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
>
> Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
> vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
> works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
> certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
> votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
> important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
> because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
> the input of the community, binding or not.
>
> Paul
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hhhmmm.... :-(
> >
> > I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is not
> > registered.
> >
> > Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how about
> > 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) ports
> end
> > with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default https
> > port :-)
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
> >
> > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> >>
> >> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> >> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> >> >
> >> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better choices.
> >> Or
> >> > others.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ruwan Linton
> > http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Fremantle
> Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>
> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
> paul@wso2.com
>
> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
Ruwan
This page is useful because it shows common usage as well as official
assignment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers
Eric - based on the usual Apache rules we actually encourage you to
vote. Ok I know this sounds wierd, but seriously the way that Apache
works is that it encourages everyone in the community to vote, but for
certain decisions only committers or PMC members are legally "binding
votes" according to Apache rules. But, of course, the voting still is
important information. Usually Apache votes don't end up in a "count"
because we work towards consensus, so for most situations, we take all
the input of the community, binding or not.
Paul
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:03 AM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hhhmmm.... :-(
>
> I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is not
> registered.
>
> Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how about
> 8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) ports end
> with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default https
> port :-)
>
> WDYT?
>
> [1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>
> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net> wrote:
>
>> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>>
>> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
>> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>> >
>> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better choices.
>> Or
>> > others.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
--
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>.
Hhhmmm.... :-(
I just checked the IANA [1] registered ports and found that 4433 is not
registered.
Anyway I think openssl is widely used and we should change it, how about
8243 (I don't like consecutive ports to be used as http and https) ports end
with 43 gives you some meaning of https because 443 is the default https
port :-)
WDYT?
[1] - http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net> wrote:
> Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
>
> > 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> > 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
> >
> > HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better choices.
> Or
> > others.
>
--
Ruwan Linton
http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
RE: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by "Hubert, Eric" <er...@jamba.net>.
Oh, yes - Mark is right about that.
> 8282 is fine as far as I know.
> 4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
>
> HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better choices.
Or
> others.
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Mark Carranza <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Synapse newbie here.
8282 is fine as far as I know.
4433 is widely used (default openssl port I think...?)
HTTPS on 8283 or 8233, while not as mnemonic, might be better choices. Or
others.
--Mark
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Hubert, Eric <er...@jamba.net>
wrote:
> Though I have no vote I also like to express that I like the idea. In a
> production environment users will change the ports to their needs, but
> this change will likely improve the first time experience of many users,
> as common web ports like 8080 or 8443 are widely used which often
> results in "address already in use" type of errors.
>
> Regards,
> Eric
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:pzfreo@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:28 PM
> > To: user@synapse.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused
> > numbers
> >
> > I think you mean the 1.2 release :)
> >
> > Yes I'm +1.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > If there is no objection, I would like to change these ports
> effective
> > from
> > > 1.7 release onwards (fixed for the 1.7 release as well).
> > >
> > > I am already in the process of registering these ports with IANA.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ruwan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Ruwan Linton
> <ru...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think we better call a proper vote for this, What do you think
> Paul?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Ruwan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 from me.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Upul Godage <up...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>> > Hi all,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Right now Synapse uses the ports, HTTP port 8080 and HTTPS port
> > 8443 by
> > >>> > default. When Synapse is running with other applications such
> as
> > Tomcat
> > >>> > servers etc. users have to change either one of these
> applications
> > when
> > >>> > there is a conflict. It would be better if we use two unused
> ports
> > for
> > >>> > Synapse by default.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > The following two ports are suggested to be used as Synapse
> default
> > >>> ports,
> > >>> > and get them registered for Synapse.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > HTTP 8282
> > >>> > HTTPS 4433
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Upul
>
--
Mark Carranza
Software Design and Development
office: 414 Mason St., Suite 802, San Francisco, CA 94102
email: mark.carranza@gmail.com
office phone: (415) 777-3777
RE: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by "Hubert, Eric" <er...@jamba.net>.
Though I have no vote I also like to express that I like the idea. In a
production environment users will change the ports to their needs, but
this change will likely improve the first time experience of many users,
as common web ports like 8080 or 8443 are widely used which often
results in "address already in use" type of errors.
Regards,
Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fremantle [mailto:pzfreo@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:28 PM
> To: user@synapse.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused
> numbers
>
> I think you mean the 1.2 release :)
>
> Yes I'm +1.
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > If there is no objection, I would like to change these ports
effective
> from
> > 1.7 release onwards (fixed for the 1.7 release as well).
> >
> > I am already in the process of registering these ports with IANA.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ruwan
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Ruwan Linton
<ru...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think we better call a proper vote for this, What do you think
Paul?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Ruwan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Upul Godage <up...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > Hi all,
> >>> >
> >>> > Right now Synapse uses the ports, HTTP port 8080 and HTTPS port
> 8443 by
> >>> > default. When Synapse is running with other applications such
as
> Tomcat
> >>> > servers etc. users have to change either one of these
applications
> when
> >>> > there is a conflict. It would be better if we use two unused
ports
> for
> >>> > Synapse by default.
> >>> >
> >>> > The following two ports are suggested to be used as Synapse
default
> >>> ports,
> >>> > and get them registered for Synapse.
> >>> >
> >>> > HTTP 8282
> >>> > HTTPS 4433
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Upul
Re: Changing default HTTP, HTTPS ports of Synapse to unused numbers
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
I think you mean the 1.2 release :)
Yes I'm +1.
Paul
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there is no objection, I would like to change these ports effective from
> 1.7 release onwards (fixed for the 1.7 release as well).
>
> I am already in the process of registering these ports with IANA.
>
> Thanks,
> Ruwan
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Ruwan Linton <ru...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I think we better call a proper vote for this, What do you think Paul?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ruwan
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Upul Godage <up...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > Right now Synapse uses the ports, HTTP port 8080 and HTTPS port 8443 by
>>> > default. When Synapse is running with other applications such as Tomcat
>>> > servers etc. users have to change either one of these applications when
>>> > there is a conflict. It would be better if we use two unused ports for
>>> > Synapse by default.
>>> >
>>> > The following two ports are suggested to be used as Synapse default
>>> ports,
>>> > and get them registered for Synapse.
>>> >
>>> > HTTP 8282
>>> > HTTPS 4433
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Upul
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Fremantle
>>> Co-Founder and VP of Technical Sales, WSO2
>>> Apache Synapse PMC Chair
>>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
>>>
>>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>>> paul@wso2.com
>>>
>>> "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ruwan Linton
>> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ruwan Linton
> http://www.wso2.org - "Oxygenating the Web Services Platform"
>
--
Paul Fremantle
Co-Founder and CTO, WSO2
Apache Synapse PMC Chair
OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com