Mixed Case class names and SWF, SWC etc

[Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>]

Hi,

Also doesn't look like it's been consistently applied - for instance in Mustella we have CompileMustellaSwfs.java, SwfLoaderTestAdapter.java and CompileMxmlUtils.java. And what about HtmlTestAdapter.java? All of those class name read fine to me.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: Mixed Case class names and SWF, SWC etc

[Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>]

On 8/17/12 3:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> Mustella was mostly developed by QA and even the parts I did were not
>> reviewed 
> QA didn't review their own code? Ironic much? :-)
Not with respect to the API naming conventions.  We would not have spent
time reviewing stuff not intended for public consumption (which was the case
back then).



-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Re: Mixed Case class names and SWF, SWC etc

[Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>]

Hi,

> Mustella was mostly developed by QA and even the parts I did were not reviewed 
QA didn't review their own code? Ironic much? :-)

I with Tink on this and actually prefer the camel case. Not that it's anything to get into a huge debate about. I wouldn't insist it had to be done one way or the other.

Thank,
Justin

Re: Mixed Case class names and SWF, SWC etc

[Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>]

On 8/17/12 3:28 PM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Also doesn't look like it's been consistently applied - for instance in
> Mustella we have CompileMustellaSwfs.java, SwfLoaderTestAdapter.java and
> CompileMxmlUtils.java. And what about HtmlTestAdapter.java? All of those class
> name read fine to me.
> 
Mustella was mostly developed by QA and even the parts I did were not
reviewed so there could certainly be things that don't conform.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui