You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2006/12/15 12:10:23 UTC
Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-1970) JavaFlow OJB sample overwrites first entry on insert
Jeff Turner writes:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:20:04PM +0100, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this relatively new feature of adding comments to Jira issues by
> > replying to its mails has one caveat: autoreplies like this absent
> > message get added to Jira as well like you can see here:
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1969
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1970
> >
> > Is there any possibility to prevent this?
>
> The majority of autoreplies are caught by a procmail rule, but these ones
> are generated by Outlook Express directly, and have absolutely nothing in
> the headers indicating they are autoreplies.
>
> I'll block replies from cticorporativo@fibertel.com.ar and let them know
> to configure their clients a bit better.
Interesting -- they've been autoreplying to all posts on the SpamAssassin
users list, too, and SVN commits on our dev list. Are they subscribed
to every Apache list there is, or something?
--j.
Re: [jira] Commented: (COCOON-1970) JavaFlow OJB sample overwrites
first entry on insert
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <an...@apache.org>.
Justin Mason escribió:
> Jeff Turner writes:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:20:04PM +0100, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this relatively new feature of adding comments to Jira issues by
>>> replying to its mails has one caveat: autoreplies like this absent
>>> message get added to Jira as well like you can see here:
>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1969
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1970
>>>
>>> Is there any possibility to prevent this?
>>>
>> The majority of autoreplies are caught by a procmail rule, but these ones
>> are generated by Outlook Express directly, and have absolutely nothing in
>> the headers indicating they are autoreplies.
>>
>> I'll block replies from cticorporativo@fibertel.com.ar and let them know
>> to configure their clients a bit better.
>>
>
> Interesting -- they've been autoreplying to all posts on the SpamAssassin
> users list, too, and SVN commits on our dev list. Are they subscribed
> to every Apache list there is, or something?
>
I did not read this mail previously, call me paranoid, but I suspect
this is a spammer, trying to understand how jira works, ie: in case the
mailbox of the user does not exists anymore. The message on the autmatic
reply mail says the mailbox was deactivated. Given the foot print of the
intented address I wonder what an account manager from a shopping center
do here. :)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.