You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apex.apache.org by "Vlad Rozov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/15 01:16:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (APEXCORE-777) Application Master may not shutdown due to incorrect numRequestedContainers counting

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Vlad Rozov updated APEXCORE-777:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Application Master may not shutdown due to incorrect numRequestedContainers counting  (was: Application Master may not shutdown due to incorrect numRequesteContainers counting)

> Application Master may not shutdown due to incorrect numRequestedContainers counting
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APEXCORE-777
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-777
>             Project: Apache Apex Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Vlad Rozov
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Consider a scenario where App master requests a container from Yarn (numRequestedContainers = 1). There is not enough resources and the request timeouts. My understanding is that App master will re-request it again but the number of requested containers will not change (one newly requested, one removed). Let's assume that App master, by the time Yarn responds back decides that it does not need any. If Yarn responds with one allocated containers, numRequestedContainers will go to 0 (correct), but Yarn may respond back with 2 allocated containers if by the time App Master sends the second request it already allocated a container requested in the original request (the one that timeouted) as Yarn does not guarantee that removed request is fullfilled (see Yarn doc). Will not in this case numRequestedContainers be -1 due to the bulk decrement?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)