You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> on 2003/05/11 23:34:15 UTC

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

brane@tigris.org wrote:

>Author: brane
>Date: Sun May 11 18:08:40 2003
>New Revision: 5886
>
>Modified:
>   trunk/win-tests.py
>Log:
>Get the Windows tests running again.
>
>* win-tests.py: Change the way executables are searched for, to account
>  for the output from the generated project files.
>  
>
And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
interested in Windows binaries.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <br...@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Greg Stein wrote:

>On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:34:15AM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
>  
>
>>brane@tigris.org wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Author: brane
>>>Date: Sun May 11 18:08:40 2003
>>>New Revision: 5886
>>>
>>>Modified:
>>>  trunk/win-tests.py
>>>Log:
>>>Get the Windows tests running again.
>>>
>>>* win-tests.py: Change the way executables are searched for, to account
>>> for the output from the generated project files.
>>>      
>>>
>>And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
>>interested in Windows binaries.
>>    
>>
>
>Euh? Doesn't this only fix the *tests*? The binaries are still the same,
>right? So how would this necessitate a release?
>
It's the last in a line of commits that fixes the build, the tests, and
actually makes the tests pass (I also fixed the  svn_io_remove_file
issue). The 0.22.0 and 0.22.1 sources a) don't build completely and b)
don't work on Windows.

>And then we have the 0.23 release in a few days, as Michael pointed out.
>
Sure. But as Karl said, 0.22.2 would be 0.22.1 + the relevant patches,
not HEAD.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <br...@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

RE: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by "D.J. Heap" <dj...@dhiprovo.com>.
Brane also fixed io.c for Windows in r5885.



-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein@lyra.org] 
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Branko ??ibej
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk


On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:34:15AM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
> brane@tigris.org wrote:
> >Author: brane
> >Date: Sun May 11 18:08:40 2003
> >New Revision: 5886
> >
> >Modified:
> >   trunk/win-tests.py
> >Log:
> >Get the Windows tests running again.
> >
> >* win-tests.py: Change the way executables are searched for, to
account
> >  for the output from the generated project files.
>
> And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
> interested in Windows binaries.

Euh? Doesn't this only fix the *tests*? The binaries are still the same,
right? So how would this necessitate a release?

And then we have the 0.23 release in a few days, as Michael pointed out.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. If you have received this email
in error please notify the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been
swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:34:15AM +0200, Branko ??ibej wrote:
> brane@tigris.org wrote:
> >Author: brane
> >Date: Sun May 11 18:08:40 2003
> >New Revision: 5886
> >
> >Modified:
> >   trunk/win-tests.py
> >Log:
> >Get the Windows tests running again.
> >
> >* win-tests.py: Change the way executables are searched for, to account
> >  for the output from the generated project files.
>
> And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
> interested in Windows binaries.

Euh? Doesn't this only fix the *tests*? The binaries are still the same,
right? So how would this necessitate a release?

And then we have the 0.23 release in a few days, as Michael pointed out.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by Jeff Hinrichs <je...@delasco.com>.
Branko Čibej said:
> brane@tigris.org wrote:
>
>>New Revision: 5886
> And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
> interested in Windows binaries.
yes, please.
 -jeff



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Michael Price wrote:

> kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>
>> Michael Price <mi...@acm.org> writes:
>>
>>> Sure. But aren't we releasing 0.23 in 3 days anyway? If not then the
>>> status page needs to be updated.
>>
>>
>> We are, but that will include bunches of changes that aren't in the
>> 0.22 line at all.  It's nice to have the 0.22.x branch slowly peter
>> out to obsolete stability :-), so that we can recommend it in an
>> emergency if 0.23 turns out to have problems.
>>
>> (Only if you have time to roll it, of course.)
>
>
> I have time but I don't have a Windows box so someone is going to have
> to provide me a list of all the revisions to include. For instance,
> I've seen 5885, 5886, and 5819 listed but what about things like 5878? 

5878 and the series 5884--5888 should go in; I don't know about 5819,
it's not Windows-specific.

> So if someone can give me a list of the relevant Win32 revisions then
> I'll package it all up.
>
> Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>


-- 
Brane Čibej   <br...@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by Michael Price <mi...@acm.org>.
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Michael Price <mi...@acm.org> writes:
>>Sure. But aren't we releasing 0.23 in 3 days anyway? If not then the
>>status page needs to be updated.
> 
> We are, but that will include bunches of changes that aren't in the
> 0.22 line at all.  It's nice to have the 0.22.x branch slowly peter
> out to obsolete stability :-), so that we can recommend it in an
> emergency if 0.23 turns out to have problems.
> 
> (Only if you have time to roll it, of course.)

I have time but I don't have a Windows box so someone is going to have to 
provide me a list of all the revisions to include. For instance, I've seen 5885, 
5886, and 5819 listed but what about things like 5878?

So if someone can give me a list of the relevant Win32 revisions then I'll 
package it all up.

Michael


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Michael Price <mi...@acm.org> writes:
> Sure. But aren't we releasing 0.23 in 3 days anyway? If not then the
> status page needs to be updated.

We are, but that will include bunches of changes that aren't in the
0.22 line at all.  It's nice to have the 0.22.x branch slowly peter
out to obsolete stability :-), so that we can recommend it in an
emergency if 0.23 turns out to have problems.

(Only if you have time to roll it, of course.)

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by Michael Price <mi...@acm.org>.
kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> writes:
>>And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
>>interested in Windows binaries.
> 
> More to the point, if our release manager is up for it... Michael? :-)

Sure. But aren't we releasing 0.23 in 3 days anyway? If not then the status page 
needs to be updated.

Michael



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: svn commit: rev 5886 - trunk

Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> writes:
> And so it goes. We can make a 0.22.2 release now if anybody is
> interested in Windows binaries.

More to the point, if our release manager is up for it... Michael? :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org