You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ofbiz.apache.org by jjmbconquista <jj...@yahoo.com.br> on 2009/03/04 13:25:49 UTC
what are the consequences for the modification of the entity
postalAddress?
I am adapting the ofbiz for use in Brazil and I need to modify table
postal_address, specifically the address1 column, this column stores the
number and street, and I need to put street numbers on different fields, I
will create new fields in the table. The problem is that the address1 field
is referenced in the code of ofbiz in many class. How to do this changes in
responsible manner?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/what-are-the-consequences-for-the-modification-of-the-entity-postalAddress--tp22329028p22329028.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: what are the consequences for the modification of the entity
postalAddress?
Posted by BJ Freeman <bj...@free-man.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
you can use the extend-entity if you want to add fields for your
requirements to the postalAdress entity.
the way ofbiz works all forms that use the postalAddress entity will
show the additional fields.
jjmbconquista sent the following on 3/4/2009 4:25 AM:
> I am adapting the ofbiz for use in Brazil and I need to modify table
> postal_address, specifically the address1 column, this column stores the
> number and street, and I need to put street numbers on different fields, I
> will create new fields in the table. The problem is that the address1 field
> is referenced in the code of ofbiz in many class. How to do this changes in
> responsible manner?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJrwmVrP3NbaWWqE4RAqHfAJ94fpr4FbVSXTFOv1ErRjKBdsU7xACfZv8U
rLISsNltz8E+wjUjkVj+xts=
=1XsI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----