You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to batik-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Urs Reupke <ur...@gmx.net> on 2005/12/20 09:41:12 UTC
SVG 1.2 beta release (was: Re: Nightly release much improved over
1.6)
thomas.deweese@kodak.com wrote:
> My current leaning would be a release of
> 1.6.1 off the svg11 branch,
> but I am open to debate on a 1.7 from the trunk (svg 1.2 code). It is
> also possible that we could
> have both 1.6.1 stable, and 1.7beta or some such.
What's the situation with SVG 1.2? Is there finalization of the drafts
to be expected anytime soon? If not, are they still being revised or
just bidding their time until they become recommendations?
In other words - how interesting to the general public (up to and
including me) would an 1.7beta release be, assuming that one wouldn't
want to revise his code every three month?
I remember reading that Batik's SVG 1.2 had some differences from W3C's
- is that correct, or were these just "working differences" until the
draft was / is finalized?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: SVG 1.2 beta release
Posted by Andreas Neumann <ne...@karto.baug.ethz.ch>.
Urs Reupke wrote:
> thomas.deweese@kodak.com wrote:
>> My current leaning would be a release of 1.6.1 off the svg11 branch,
>> but I am open to debate on a 1.7 from the trunk (svg 1.2 code). It
>> is also possible that we could
>> have both 1.6.1 stable, and 1.7beta or some such.
>
> What's the situation with SVG 1.2? Is there finalization of the drafts
> to be expected anytime soon? If not, are they still being revised or
> just bidding their time until they become recommendations?
the SVG Tiny 1.2 spec is in "Last Call" and more or less stable, not
many changes expected here.
However, for the SVG 1.2 Full profile (which is an extension of SVG
Tiny), there are changes to be expected. It will need a couple more
months to stabilize the full profile.
>
> In other words - how interesting to the general public (up to and
> including me) would an 1.7beta release be, assuming that one wouldn't
> want to revise his code every three month?
> I remember reading that Batik's SVG 1.2 had some differences from
> W3C's - is that correct, or were these just "working differences"
> until the draft was / is finalized?
Well I wouldn't recommend building production code on SVG 1.2 features
yet, but a 1.7beta release would still make sense for many useres
interested in experimenting with some of the new SVG 1.2 features.
So, in my opinion it would make sense to release both versions (1.6.1
and 1.7beta), if the effort of releasing two versions is not too big for
the Batik developers.
Just my two cents,
Andreas
--
----------------------------------------------
Andreas Neumann - Institute of Cartography
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH)
ETH Hoenggerberg
CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Phone: ++41-1-633 3031, Fax: ++41-1-633 1153
e-mail: neumann@karto.baug.ethz.ch
www: http://www.carto.net/neumann/
SVG.Open: http://www.svgopen.org/
Carto.net: http://www.carto.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: batik-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org