You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com> on 2006/08/18 22:10:10 UTC
Classloading branch
I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
separate module. Should be simple enough.
I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
afterwards, if all goes well.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Note that Xbean 2.6 has not been released yet, so if we want to keep
compatibility,
and if put it in 2.6, we need to make proxies wrt to 2.5 tag.
The main problem I see is that the class hierachy can not be maintained using
proxies, so I'm not sure if it's worth it.
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <ad...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> This makes sense to me. Should we have thin, deprecated, proxies in the old package or is that over the top?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:13:01
> To:xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Classloading branch
>
> Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named
> org.apache.xbean.classloaders
> instead of keeping the old one
> org.apache.xbean.server.classloader
>
> It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ...
>
> On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
> > > separate module. Should be simple enough.
> > >
> > > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> > > afterwards, if all goes well.
> > >
> > Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
This makes sense to me. Should we have thin, deprecated, proxies in the old package or is that over the top?
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:13:01
To:xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Classloading branch
Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named
org.apache.xbean.classloaders
instead of keeping the old one
org.apache.xbean.server.classloader
It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ...
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
> >
> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> > afterwards, if all goes well.
> >
> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, it sounds better.
On 8/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com> wrote:
> I prefer we don't use a plural for a module or package name, so how
> about we call the module xbean-classloader?
>
> -dain
>
> On Aug 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named
> > org.apache.xbean.classloaders
> > instead of keeping the old one
> > org.apache.xbean.server.classloader
> >
> > It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ...
> >
> > On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code
> >> into a
> >> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
> >> >
> >> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> >> > afterwards, if all goes well.
> >> >
> >> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Guillaume Nodet
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
I prefer we don't use a plural for a module or package name, so how
about we call the module xbean-classloader?
-dain
On Aug 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named
> org.apache.xbean.classloaders
> instead of keeping the old one
> org.apache.xbean.server.classloader
>
> It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ...
>
> On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code
>> into a
>> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
>> >
>> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
>> > afterwards, if all goes well.
>> >
>> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named
org.apache.xbean.classloaders
instead of keeping the old one
org.apache.xbean.server.classloader
It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ...
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
> >
> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> > afterwards, if all goes well.
> >
> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <ad...@toolazydogs.com>.
Doh! Good catch.
Regards,
Alan
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: "Guillaume Nodet" <gn...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:12:59
To:xbean-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Classloading branch
Just seen that there is one annotated bean
(ThreadContextClassLoaderFactoryBean.java), so
we need to add a reference to the xbean maven plugin to
generate the mapping infos.
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
> >
> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> > afterwards, if all goes well.
> >
> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Just seen that there is one annotated bean
(ThreadContextClassLoaderFactoryBean.java), so
we need to add a reference to the xbean maven plugin to
generate the mapping infos.
On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
> >
> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> > afterwards, if all goes well.
> >
> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Re: Classloading branch
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code into a
> separate module. Should be simple enough.
>
> I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
> afterwards, if all goes well.
>
Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
Regards,
Alan