You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@aurora.apache.org by "Bill Farner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/15 02:17:43 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AURORA-264) Scheduler should be resilient to duplicated attributes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13935914#comment-13935914 ] 

Bill Farner commented on AURORA-264:
------------------------------------

https://reviews.apache.org/r/19250/

> Scheduler should be resilient to duplicated attributes
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-264
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: Bill Farner
>            Assignee: Bill Farner
>
> The scheduler will encounter an IllegalArgumentException if the slave attributes includes more than one attribute by the same name.  Example stack trace from a unit test to repro the issue:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: expected one element but was: <Attribute(name:jvm, values:[1.4]), Attribute(name:jvm, values:[1.6, 1.7])>
> 	at com.google.common.collect.Iterators.getOnlyElement(Iterators.java:312)
> 	at com.google.common.collect.Iterators.getOnlyElement(Iterators.java:324)
> 	at com.google.common.collect.Iterables.getOnlyElement(Iterables.java:299)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.ConstraintFilter.getVeto(ConstraintFilter.java:73)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImpl$6$1.apply(SchedulingFilterImpl.java:217)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImpl$6$1.apply(SchedulingFilterImpl.java:209)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImplTest$1.answer(SchedulingFilterImplTest.java:137)
> 	at org.easymock.internal.Result.answer(Result.java:106)
> 	at org.easymock.internal.ReplayState.invokeInner(ReplayState.java:60)
> 	at org.easymock.internal.ReplayState.invoke(ReplayState.java:46)
> 	at org.easymock.internal.MockInvocationHandler.invoke(MockInvocationHandler.java:40)
> 	at org.easymock.internal.ObjectMethodsFilter.invoke(ObjectMethodsFilter.java:94)
> 	at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy6.weaklyConsistentRead(Unknown Source)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImpl$6.apply(SchedulingFilterImpl.java:209)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImpl$6.apply(SchedulingFilterImpl.java:198)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImpl.filter(SchedulingFilterImpl.java:273)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImplTest.checkConstraint(SchedulingFilterImplTest.java:518)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImplTest.checkConstraint(SchedulingFilterImplTest.java:502)
> 	at org.apache.aurora.scheduler.filter.SchedulingFilterImplTest.checkConstraint(SchedulingFilterImplTest.java:483)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)