Another Torque question.

[Patrick Saunders <ps...@comcen.com.au>]

Hi to all,
Can anyone clarrify the state of the standalone Torque at
this point in time? I'm interested to use it, though there
was speculation about it a while ago.

I'm still using Turbine 2.1b and though I downloaded Torque 3.05 (at 
least that's what the zip was called)  - I think this is the last 
version before standalone  and was eventually
able to get all my OM classes generated, though I get a 
NullPointerException when I try to do call doSelect() for one
of my tables.

There's no other information about what is causing this exception and 
it is rather frustrating - does anyone have hints about how to fix 
this? I feel I'm an ants dick away from getting it to work but I don't
know what to do next. I've tried re-compiling the classes though
I get the same result.

Ta,

Patrick.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Another Torque question.

[Kelvin Tan <ke...@relevanz.com>]

It does for me too.

But can I refer you to NOTES.txt:

"Torque should be fully functional on its own, but right now
  it doesn't work as a persistence layer without the DBService
  in Fulcrum. The classes should be moved from Fulcrum into
  this repository and Torque should be made to work on its own
  and be embeddable in applications. The DBService in Fulcrum
  should be a wrapper around Torque."

I'm running Torque-standalone without Fulcrum though, what gives?

Also, there's mention in that about having proxies for large objects. Now
correct me if I'm out of line here, or out of context, but are there any
plans for lazy materialization?

K

----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>
To: Turbine Users List <tu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: Another Torque question.


> "Patrick Saunders" <ps...@comcen.com.au> writes:
>
> > Hi to all,
> > Can anyone clarrify the state of the standalone Torque at
> > this point in time? I'm interested to use it, though there
> > was speculation about it a while ago.
>
> The standalone Torque works great -- I use it in production.
>
> > There's no other information about what is causing this exception and
> > it is rather frustrating - does anyone have hints about how to fix
> > this? I feel I'm an ants dick away from getting it to work but I don't
> > know what to do next. I've tried re-compiling the classes though
> > I get the same result.
>
> Try a debugger or a stack trace and debugging breadcrumbs to see where
> you problem is happening.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Another Torque question.

[Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>]

"Patrick Saunders" <ps...@comcen.com.au> writes:

> Hi to all,
> Can anyone clarrify the state of the standalone Torque at
> this point in time? I'm interested to use it, though there
> was speculation about it a while ago.

The standalone Torque works great -- I use it in production.

> There's no other information about what is causing this exception and 
> it is rather frustrating - does anyone have hints about how to fix 
> this? I feel I'm an ants dick away from getting it to work but I don't
> know what to do next. I've tried re-compiling the classes though
> I get the same result.

Try a debugger or a stack trace and debugging breadcrumbs to see where
you problem is happening.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>