You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> on 2005/07/27 08:09:53 UTC
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Sounds cool...
another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) - there
has not been much feedback though on this.
What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
>
> MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> ahead and make it public.
>
> Rich
>
> Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> >
> >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> >which has already been released.)
> >
> >Let see what James has to say ...
> >
> >sean
> >
> >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo somewhere
> >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Rich
> >>
> >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in the
> >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO, you
> >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> >>>official.
> >>>
> >>>sean
> >>>
> >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <gl...@neom.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> >>>>
> >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> >>>>
> >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs that
> >>>>have already been fixed.
> >>>>
> >>>>What are people using?
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well, I have this one or two example apps for MyFaces still up my sleeve,
let's see what they will be pulling off.
I can't change the student's project assignments in the middle of the run
though, them not really being my slaves at all (attention: they are
registered to this mailing list ;)
regards,
Martin
On 7/29/05, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In that case, if we are thinking in create a maintain another set of
> examples, these examples should show more complex relations between
> myfaces components, best practices, i18n, etc. Something more
> sophisticated with a better design... although more difficult to
> maintain *sigh*. But this would increase the so-called wow-factor and
> demonstrate that you can do real production applications beyond human
> imagination with myfaces...
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/7/29, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
> > stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
> > the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
> > and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
> > things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
> > example).
> >
> > If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
> > had From dev-return-3940-apmail-myfaces-dev-archive=myfaces.apache.org@myfaces.apache.org Fri Jul 29 22:42:57 2005
Return-Path: <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83544 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2005 19:19:28 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jul 2005 19:19:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 64617 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2005 19:19:27 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-myfaces-dev-archive@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64353 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2005 19:19:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@myfaces.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <ma...@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <ma...@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Post: <ma...@myfaces.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.myfaces.apache.org>
Reply-To: "MyFaces Development" <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@myfaces.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64340 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2005 19:19:25 -0000
Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:19:25 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required.0
tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of manfred.geiler@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.198 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.184.198] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.198)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:19:18 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i18so633288wra
for <de...@myfaces.apache.org>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s¾ta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=DzIPHIcFZjKWNNvylekInU7qSuKeAjGfL3RGaziPqlkXNPpG4MOwijKwAJT2/b9pJHrVyyqXrYqWIksgmS9udqXYkYEFy/mRthKLZO/0uwheActR8gMbgQbdv7O+a+jiCuMAiFHOngwqFwu3sHYx70r0REg9snioA4h4opeVGs8Received: by 10.54.27.50 with SMTP id a50mr1507636wra;
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.89.10 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 12:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <56...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:19:23 +0200
From: Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Generating a facelets "myfaces.taglib.xml" file
In-Reply-To: <3B...@mac.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8f...@mail.gmail.com>
<5a...@mail.gmail.com>
<23...@mail.gmail.com>
<3B...@mac.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
It's rather simple and still useful IMO.
You just define the path of your (new) component in the according
build.properties (now called codegen.properties) and run one of the
targets generate-single-api-component, generate-single-impl-component
or generate-single-components-component depending on what kind of
component class files (API, Impl or Tomahawk) should be generated
("injected").
The generation seems to be broken after the reorg. I will have a look
on that soon. Next week I'm on vacation, so it will be second week of
August.
-Manfred
2005/7/29, Bill Dudney <bd...@mac.com>:
> Could someone provide a quick overview of the code generation stuff.
>
> I'd hate for us to drop it completely if its still useful.
>
> If its not useful then lets get rid of the xml files and the comments
> that say 'don't edit this code'.
>
> My $0.02 worth.
>
> TTFN,
>
> -bd-
>
> On Jul 28, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> > No code generation is going on in the new build AFAIK. I've mentioned
> > this a few times but everyone says that we are fine - let's release,
> > etc. :-)
> >
> > There are the xml files which result in the "generated code do not
> > alter" portions of the source. Do we really need to keep these
> > around? They seem like a maintenance nightmare. (I understand there
> > use in the beginning but I'm confused about now.) Are we really ever
> > going to generate that code again? I suspect things are already out
> > of sync by now.
> >
> > Not sure what else requires codegen. I thought there was some WAP
> > stuff too but I'm a bit confused on that area of MyFaces.
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On 7/28/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> must have been left out in the SVN reorg then - Sean, any comment
> >> on that?
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> Martin
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/27/05, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> What ever became of the codegen stuff?
> >>>
> >>> I was hoping to submit a patch to automatically build a
> >>> myfaces.taglib.xml file for use with the facelets project, but I
> >>> can't
> >>> seem to find it anymore.
> >>>
> >>> ========================
> >>>
> >>> <facelet-taglib>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> <namespace>http://myfaces.apache.org/extensions</namespace>
> >>
> >>> #foreach ($c in $componentList)
> >>> <tag>
> >>> <tag-name>$c.baseJSPTagName</tag-name>
> >>> <component>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> <component-type>${c.componentType}</component-type>
> >>
> >>> #if ($c.rendererType)
> >>>
> >>>
> >> <renderer-type>${c.rendererType}</renderer-type>
> >>
> >>> #end## if ($c.rendererType)
> >>> </component>
> >>> </tag>
> >>> #end## foreach ($c in $componentList)
> >>> </facelet-taglib>
> >>>
> >>> ========================
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
Yes, of course. The simple examples are great just because they are
'simple' and serve as good documentation, and different examples may
should components with different configuration (as the tree2
examples), which is good...
Bruno
2005/7/31, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>:
> What about a "petstore" or "mail reader" type application? I
> certainly don't have any objection to showcasing the components
> working together. Lets just try to do it in a way that makes sense
> and helps the user.
>
> Before we had the one set of examples which used jscookmenu and
> panelNavigation. That was fine to show off that aspect of MyFaces but
> if you wanted to see a simple example of how a calendar worked, it was
> a lot of extra code to sort through. Plus adding new examples was a
> little more time consuming/confusing.
>
> The simple examples I think we have now are just fine. IMO the
> existing style is sufficient but that is just MO. If we wanted to
> make an example app that showcased how these components worked
> together, that would be great. The problem I had with the two sets of
> examples before was that they were the same except one was just
> stuffed inside jscookmenu. That made it hard to maintain and
> confusing. A more complex example would be useful as long as it
> didn't imply (or seemed to imply) that every component would be
> represented (like we had before.)
>
> Those are just a few thoughts on this. I'm open to compromise of
> course. I take it there is no problem/objection to the simple
> examples as they stand now right? We're just looking at adding
> another set?
>
> sean
>
>
>
> On 7/30/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > right, clear, the examples I had in mind were applications using MyFaces
> > anyway - they shouldn't wander into the codebase of MyFaces.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/30/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I wasn't suggesting a new *set* of examples. Just a single new one that
> > shows off jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined.
> > >
> > > Bruno Aranda wrote:
> > >
> > > In that case, if we are thinking in create a maintain another set of
> > > examples, these examples should show more complex relations between
> > > myfaces components, best practices, i18n, etc. Something more
> > > sophisticated with a better design... although more difficult to
> > >
> > > maintain *sigh*. But this would increase the so-called wow-factor and
> > > demonstrate that you can do real production applications beyond human
> > > imagination with myfaces...
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> > > 2005/7/29, Grant Smith
> > > <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> > >
> > >
> > > While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
> > > stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
> > > the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
> > >
> > > and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
> > > things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
> > > example).
> > >
> > > If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
> > >
> > > had in the past, I would agree that style is not important. However, as
> > > we have now consolidated the examples, we need to have a compromise.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Martin's Slaves of Summer could help ;)
> > >
> > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
> > > that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
> > > important.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
What about a "petstore" or "mail reader" type application? I
certainly don't have any objection to showcasing the components
working together. Lets just try to do it in a way that makes sense
and helps the user.
Before we had the one set of examples which used jscookmenu and
panelNavigation. That was fine to show off that aspect of MyFaces but
if you wanted to see a simple example of how a calendar worked, it was
a lot of extra code to sort through. Plus adding new examples was a
little more time consuming/confusing.
The simple examples I think we have now are just fine. IMO the
existing style is sufficient but that is just MO. If we wanted to
make an example app that showcased how these components worked
together, that would be great. The problem I had with the two sets of
examples before was that they were the same except one was just
stuffed inside jscookmenu. That made it hard to maintain and
confusing. A more complex example would be useful as long as it
didn't imply (or seemed to imply) that every component would be
represented (like we had before.)
Those are just a few thoughts on this. I'm open to compromise of
course. I take it there is no problem/objection to the simple
examples as they stand now right? We're just looking at adding
another set?
sean
On 7/30/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> right, clear, the examples I had in mind were applications using MyFaces
> anyway - they shouldn't wander into the codebase of MyFaces.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/30/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> >
> > I wasn't suggesting a new *set* of examples. Just a single new one that
> shows off jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined.
> >
> > Bruno Aranda wrote:
> >
> > In that case, if we are thinking in create a maintain another set of
> > examples, these examples should show more complex relations between
> > myfaces components, best practices, i18n, etc. Something more
> > sophisticated with a better design... although more difficult to
> >
> > maintain *sigh*. But this would increase the so-called wow-factor and
> > demonstrate that you can do real production applications beyond human
> > imagination with myfaces...
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > 2005/7/29, Grant Smith
> > <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> >
> >
> > While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
> > stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
> > the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
> >
> > and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
> > things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
> > example).
> >
> > If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
> >
> > had in the past, I would agree that style is not important. However, as
> > we have now consolidated the examples, we need to have a compromise.
> >
> > Perhaps Martin's Slaves of Summer could help ;)
> >
> > Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
> > that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
> > important.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > .
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
right, clear, the examples I had in mind were applications using MyFaces
anyway - they shouldn't wander into the codebase of MyFaces.
regards,
Martin
On 7/30/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
>
>
> I wasn't suggesting a new *set* of examples. Just a single new one that
> shows off jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined.
>
> Bruno Aranda wrote:
>
> In that case, if we are thinking in create a maintain another set of
> examples, these examples should show more complex relations between
> myfaces components, best practices, i18n, etc. Something more
> sophisticated with a better design... although more difficult to
> maintain *sigh*. But this would increase the so-called wow-factor and
> demonstrate that you can do real production applications beyond human
> imagination with myfaces...
>
> Bruno
>
> 2005/7/29, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
>
> While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
> stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
> the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
> and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
> things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
> example).
>
> If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
> had in the past, I would agree that style is not important. However, as
> we have now consolidated the examples, we need to have a compromise.
>
> Perhaps Martin's Slaves of Summer could help ;)
>
> Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
> that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
> important.
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
In that case, if we are thinking in create a maintain another set of
examples, these examples should show more complex relations between
myfaces components, best practices, i18n, etc. Something more
sophisticated with a better design... although more difficult to
maintain *sigh*. But this would increase the so-called wow-factor and
demonstrate that you can do real production applications beyond human
imagination with myfaces...
Bruno
2005/7/29, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>:
> While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
> stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
> the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
> and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
> things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
> example).
>
> If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
> had in the past, I would agree that style is not important. However, as
> we have now consolidated the examples, we need to have a compromise.
>
> Perhaps Martin's Slaves of Summer could help ;)
>
> Sean Schofield wrote:
>
> >What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
> >that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
> >important.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [XWALL HEURISTIC] Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's
next?
Posted by "joerg@artaker.at" <jo...@artaker.at>.
...I heard that!!!! ;)
joerg
>While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
>stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
>the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
>and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
>things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
>example).
>
>If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
>had in the past, I would agree that style is not important. However, as
>we have now consolidated the examples, we need to have a compromise.
>
>Perhaps Martin's Slaves of Summer could help ;)
>
>Sean Schofield wrote:
>
>
>
>>What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
>>that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
>>important.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>.
While I understand and accept the reason to strip out all the jsCookMenu
stuff, I think we did lose some of the wow-factor that was present in
the examples when they were all based on the combination of jscookMenu
and panelNavigation. Perhaps we still need one example showing how cool
things CAN look (maybe just one jscookMenu / panelNavigation combined
example).
If we were still going to maintain more than one set of examples like we
had in the past, I would agree that style is not important. However, as
we have now consolidated the examples, we need to have a compromise.
Perhaps Martin's Slaves of Summer could help ;)
Sean Schofield wrote:
>What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
>that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
>important.
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Well,
I do not agree with that... style is always important, wether this is good
or not is another question ;)
(Ruby on Rails partially thrives on style, e.g.)
regards,
Martin
On 7/29/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
> that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
> important.
>
> On 7/28/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> > Changing my vote to +1 for the new release. The simple examples look a
> > little "rough around the edges", but that's no big deal. Thanks to
> > Mathias for resolving the datatable issue!
> >
> >
> >
> > Grant Smith wrote:
> >
> > > -1 for a new release until HtmlDataTable works again (see my question
> > > in the dev list). I unfortunately am swamped at the moment so I don't
> > > have time to delve into it.
> > >
> > > .
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
What do you mean by "rough?" Is it a matter of style or functionality
that is missing? For the simple examples I would say style is not
important.
On 7/28/05, Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com> wrote:
> Changing my vote to +1 for the new release. The simple examples look a
> little "rough around the edges", but that's no big deal. Thanks to
> Mathias for resolving the datatable issue!
>
>
>
> Grant Smith wrote:
>
> > -1 for a new release until HtmlDataTable works again (see my question
> > in the dev list). I unfortunately am swamped at the moment so I don't
> > have time to delve into it.
> >
> > .
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>.
Changing my vote to +1 for the new release. The simple examples look a
little "rough around the edges", but that's no big deal. Thanks to
Mathias for resolving the datatable issue!
Grant Smith wrote:
> -1 for a new release until HtmlDataTable works again (see my question
> in the dev list). I unfortunately am swamped at the moment so I don't
> have time to delve into it.
>
> .
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Grant Smith <gr...@marathon-man.com>.
-1 for a new release until HtmlDataTable works again (see my question in
the dev list). I unfortunately am swamped at the moment so I don't have
time to delve into it.
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I agree we have fixed a bunch of bugs lately and that is encouraging.
I'm just saying that we should make one last push today and tomorrow
to close a few more if we can. I will put up the RC late Thursday if
everyone is agreeable.
sean
On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> thing is that issues keep flowing in for the MyFaces 1.0.9 release, we will
> not be knowing if this has been fixed in any of the new builds if we don't
> give out a new release.
>
> and: even though a 100 bugs remain open (80 with the last release) we have
> fixed approximately 50-100 since the last release, if I am right with my
> numbers.
>
> So I would definitely go for a new release!
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/27/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think we should hold off on the next release but I see I am out
> numbered. ;-)
> >
> > Why don't I put up a RC using the bootstrap procedure? I will try and
> > get one up in the next few days.
> >
> > A few points:
> >
> > 1.) We might want to consider 1.0.10 instead of 1.1.0 and save the 1.1
> > designation for when we are officially JSF compliant.
> >
> > 2.) We should not start voting on the RC until we have at least a RC3.
> > Last time we started voting on RC1, RC2, etc. after a few days and
> > there were still tons of bug reports coming in.
> >
> > 3.) We should fix as many of the outstanding JIRA issues as we can in
> > the next few days. There are 100+ JIRA issues. IMO that is too many
> > outstanding issues before a release.
> >
> > 4.) Noncommitters should vote (in JIRA) for the outstanding issues
> > they want fixed the most. That will help us to prioritize them.
> >
> > 5.) New issues to be fixed before the release should be added to JIRA.
> > Don't report them on the dev list (we had some of this last go
> > round.)
> >
> > sean
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
thing is that issues keep flowing in for the MyFaces 1.0.9 release, we will
not be knowing if this has been fixed in any of the new builds if we don't
give out a new release.
and: even though a 100 bugs remain open (80 with the last release) we have
fixed approximately 50-100 since the last release, if I am right with my
numbers.
So I would definitely go for a new release!
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/05, Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think we should hold off on the next release but I see I am out
> numbered. ;-)
>
> Why don't I put up a RC using the bootstrap procedure? I will try and
> get one up in the next few days.
>
> A few points:
>
> 1.) We might want to consider 1.0.10 instead of 1.1.0 and save the 1.1
> designation for when we are officially JSF compliant.
>
> 2.) We should not start voting on the RC until we have at least a RC3.
> Last time we started voting on RC1, RC2, etc. after a few days and
> there were still tons of bug reports coming in.
>
> 3.) We should fix as many of the outstanding JIRA issues as we can in
> the next few days. There are 100+ JIRA issues. IMO that is too many
> outstanding issues before a release.
>
> 4.) Noncommitters should vote (in JIRA) for the outstanding issues
> they want fixed the most. That will help us to prioritize them.
>
> 5.) New issues to be fixed before the release should be added to JIRA.
> Don't report them on the dev list (we had some of this last go
> round.)
>
> sean
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I think we should hold off on the next release but I see I am out numbered. ;-)
Why don't I put up a RC using the bootstrap procedure? I will try and
get one up in the next few days.
A few points:
1.) We might want to consider 1.0.10 instead of 1.1.0 and save the 1.1
designation for when we are officially JSF compliant.
2.) We should not start voting on the RC until we have at least a RC3.
Last time we started voting on RC1, RC2, etc. after a few days and
there were still tons of bug reports coming in.
3.) We should fix as many of the outstanding JIRA issues as we can in
the next few days. There are 100+ JIRA issues. IMO that is too many
outstanding issues before a release.
4.) Noncommitters should vote (in JIRA) for the outstanding issues
they want fixed the most. That will help us to prioritize them.
5.) New issues to be fixed before the release should be added to JIRA.
Don't report them on the dev list (we had some of this last go
round.)
sean
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Enrique Medina <e....@gmail.com>.
+1 for next release 1.1.0 :-)
Excellent work!
2005/7/27, Paul Klaer <pk...@infeurope.lu>:
>
> +1 for next release 1.1.0 asap , too!
>
> we like the new structure and all latest bugfixes! Great work, guys!
>
> Paul Klaer
>
> Klug, Boris wrote:
> >>+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
> >
> >
> > A "me too" from here!
> >
> >
> > --
> > Boris Klug
> >
> > Zitat von Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> >>+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
> >>
> >>-Manfred
> >>
> >>2005/7/27, Mathias Broekelmann <mb...@psi.de>:
> >>
> >>>+1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new
> release.
> >>>
> >>>We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change
> >>>like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ...
> >>>
> >>>Regards,
> >>>Mathias
> >
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Paul Klaer <pk...@infeurope.lu>.
+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap , too!
we like the new structure and all latest bugfixes! Great work, guys!
Paul Klaer
Klug, Boris wrote:
>>+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
>
>
> A "me too" from here!
>
>
> --
> Boris Klug
>
> Zitat von Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>>+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
>>
>>-Manfred
>>
>>2005/7/27, Mathias Broekelmann <mb...@psi.de>:
>>
>>>+1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new release.
>>>
>>>We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change
>>>like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ...
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Mathias
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by "Klug, Boris " <Bo...@debeka.de>.
> +1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
A "me too" from here!
--
Boris Klug
Zitat von Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
>
> -Manfred
>
> 2005/7/27, Mathias Broekelmann <mb...@psi.de>:
> > +1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new release.
> >
> > We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change
> > like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mathias
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 for next release 1.1.0 asap
-Manfred
2005/7/27, Mathias Broekelmann <mb...@psi.de>:
> +1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new release.
>
> We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change
> like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ...
>
> Regards,
> Mathias
>
> Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> > yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going. Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
> >
> > with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new release?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > yes, that would be fine.
> >
> > in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from committers
> > and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
> >
> > also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
> > something for that.
> >
> > For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sounds cool...
> > >
> > > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> > >
> > > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> > > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> > > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > > ahead and make it public.
> > > >
> > > > Rich
> > > >
> > > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> > > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > > >which has already been released.)
> > > > >
> > > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > > >
> > > > >sean
> > > > >
> > > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo somewhere
> > > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Thanks,
> > > > >>Rich
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in the
> > > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO, you
> > > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > > > >>>official.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>sean
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <glindholm@neom.com > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs that
> > > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Thanks
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Mathias Broekelmann <mb...@PSI.DE>.
+1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new release.
We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change
like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ...
Regards,
Mathias
Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going. Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
>
> with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new release?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes, that would be fine.
>
> in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from committers
> and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
>
> also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
> something for that.
>
> For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sounds cool...
> >
> > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> >
> > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > ahead and make it public.
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > >
> > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > >which has already been released.)
> > > >
> > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > >
> > > >sean
> > > >
> > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo somewhere
> > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks,
> > > >>Rich
> > > >>
> > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in the
> > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO, you
> > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > > >>>official.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>sean
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <glindholm@neom.com > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs that
> > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Mathias Broekelmann <mb...@PSI.DE>.
+1 The last release is almost 5 month ago. So it´s time for a new release.
We should also make a 1.1.0 version since we have some structual change
like tomahawk and shouldn´t go the way 1.0.10, 1.0.11 ...
Regards,
Mathias
Martin Marinschek schrieb:
> yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going. Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
>
> with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new release?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes, that would be fine.
>
> in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from committers
> and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
>
> also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
> something for that.
>
> For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sounds cool...
> >
> > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> >
> > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > ahead and make it public.
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > >
> > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > >which has already been released.)
> > > >
> > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > >
> > > >sean
> > > >
> > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo somewhere
> > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks,
> > > >>Rich
> > > >>
> > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in the
> > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO, you
> > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > > >>>official.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>sean
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <glindholm@neom.com > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs that
> > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
>
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
Bruno Aranda wrote:
> +1 It is many weeks ago for the last release and although there are no
> major features added, many many bugs have been fixes and we have had a
> great reorganization which is stable right now.
>
> Bruno
>
Cannot vote yet but I think the time for the next stable release is
ripe, due to the massiv bugfixes...
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 It is many weeks ago for the last release and although there are no
major features added, many many bugs have been fixes and we have had a
great reorganization which is stable right now.
Bruno
2005/7/27, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would
> have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going.
> Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
>
> with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new
> release?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > yes, that would be fine.
> >
> > in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from
> committers
> > and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
> >
> > also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
> > something for that.
> >
> > For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sounds cool...
> > >
> > > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> > >
> > > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did
> put
> > > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping
> to
> > > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > > ahead and make it public.
> > > >
> > > > Rich
> > > >
> > > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and
> on
> > > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > > >which has already been released.)
> > > > >
> > > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > > >
> > > > >sean
> > > > >
> > > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo
> somewhere
> > > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Thanks,
> > > > >>Rich
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in
> the
> > > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO,
> you
> > > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > > > >>>official.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>sean
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <glindholm@neom.com > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs
> that
> > > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>Thanks
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> >
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would
have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going.
Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new release?
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes, that would be fine.
>
> in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from
> committers
> and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
>
> also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
> something for that.
>
> For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sounds cool...
> >
> > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> >
> > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > ahead and make it public.
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > >
> > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > >which has already been released.)
> > > >
> > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > >
> > > >sean
> > > >
> > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo
> somewhere
> > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks,
> > > >>Rich
> > > >>
> > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in
> the
> > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO,
> you
> > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > > >>>official.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>sean
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <gl...@neom.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs
> that
> > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
yes, I think that the nightly build files are signed. So really all we would
have to do is declare them as RC-1 and put them up somewhere to get going.
Well, and get 3 +1s, of course.
with you and me, that makes 2 - another one out there wanting a new release?
regards,
Martin
On 7/27/05, Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> yes, that would be fine.
>
> in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from
> committers
> and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
>
> also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
> something for that.
>
> For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sounds cool...
> >
> > another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> > there has not been much feedback though on this.
> >
> > What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> > On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> > http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> > > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> > > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > > ahead and make it public.
> > >
> > > Rich
> > >
> > > Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >
> > > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> > > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > > >
> > > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > > >which has already been released.)
> > > >
> > > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > > >
> > > >sean
> > > >
> > > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo
> somewhere
> > > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > > >>
> > > >>Thanks,
> > > >>Rich
> > > >>
> > > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in
> the
> > > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO,
> you
> > > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > > >>>official.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>sean
> > > >>>
> > > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <gl...@neom.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs
> that
> > > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>What are people using?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
>
Re: MyFaces 1.0.9: how old? how stable? what's next?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <mw...@gmail.com>.
yes, that would be fine.
in apache term you must roll out an RC and wait for feedback from committers
and even users. We need three binding +1 (from committers)
also you have to sign the released files. I saw that Sean did
something for that.
For MyFaces 1.0.9 I used PGP on my own box...
-Matthias
On 7/27/05, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds cool...
>
> another thing is that I have suggested releasing a 1.0.10 (or a 1.1) -
> there has not been much feedback though on this.
>
> What's up, fellow committers, fancy a new release?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On 7/27/05, Richard Wallace <rw...@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > MyFaces 1.0.9 jars are available at
> http://www.bluesunrise.com/maven/.
> > Those are what I've been using. There was a short time where I did put
> > jars up on a private server for my dev team because of a couple of
> > issues we were having with the released versions. I was just hoping to
> > get something official setup. If the question is hosting it, I can do
> > that. Hell, I could probably even setup a script to do an svn update
> > and push snapshots out. I'll probably wind up doing that soon anyways
> > on a private server. If there's enough interest I might as well go
> > ahead and make it public.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> > Sean Schofield wrote:
> >
> > >We should ask James Mitchell. He is a new committer to MyFaces (he's
> > >a longtime committer on Struts.) He is constantly jabbering on and on
> > >about Maven so he could probably answer that ;-)
> > >
> > >I'm not sure if a nightly build is warranted but I think we should
> > >have jars for the official release builds (starting with the 1.0.9
> > >which has already been released.)
> > >
> > >Let see what James has to say ...
> > >
> > >sean
> > >
> > >On 7/26/05, Richard Wallace < rwallace@thewallacepack.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Any chance of getting a nightly snapshot in some maven repo somewhere
> > >>for those of us using maven in our projects?
> > >>
> > >>Thanks,
> > >>Rich
> > >>
> > >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I would suggest the nightly build as there have been many bug fixes
> > >>>since the release. The timing of the next release is still up in the
> > >>>air but this project is in rapid change mode at the moment so IMO, you
> > >>>always want to be using the latest release even if its not yet
> > >>>official.
> > >>>
> > >>>sean
> > >>>
> > >>>On 7/26/05, Lindholm, Greg <gl...@neom.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>I'm going to start a project with MyFaces.
> > >>>>Should I use the 1.0.9 build or grab the latest nightly build?
> > >>>>Have a lot of bugs been fixed since the release?
> > >>>>Are we getting close to a new release?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Is MyFaces on a "Release soon Release often" strategy?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>I don't mind updating often, what I really hate is fighting bugs that
> > >>>>have already been fixed.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>What are people using?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf