[RESULT] [VOTE] AIP-15: Support Multiple-Schedulers for HA & Better Scheduling Performance

[Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>]

This vote has passed with 5 +1 votes and no -1 votes.

Work will begin on this soon :)

-ash

On Mar 19 2020, at 8:53 pm, Maxime Beauchemin
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
> 
> Solid work!
> 
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:43 PM Jarek Potiuk <Ja...@polidea.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:16 PM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:06 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 (binding).
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for proceeding this AIP, Ash.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > XD
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 22:40 Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > This email calls for a vote on the design proposed in AIP-15, found
>> here
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103092651
>> > > >
>> > > > A few notes
>> > > >
>> > > > - The proposed architecture is to use an active/active architecture
>> > > >   where each scheduler is fully capable
>> > > > - Nothing in this proposal locks us in to this design long
>> term, and
>> if
>> > > >   we find it doesn't work or scale we can change it.
>> > > > - Lock contention doesn't worry me, as we (plan to) skip locked rows,
>> > > >   meaning that when one scheduler has a DAG locked it will be skipped
>> > > >   over by other schedulers
>> > > >
>> > > > This vote will last for 72 hours until 2020-03-20T21:40Z, and until
>> at
>> > > > least 3 votes have been cast.
>> > > >
>> > > > This is my +1 vote.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Ash
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Jarek Potiuk
>> Polidea | Principal Software Engineer
>> 
>> M: +48 660 796 129
>> 
>