You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org by Avantika Agrawal <t-...@microsoft.com> on 2009/05/28 00:10:35 UTC
Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Hi everyone,
My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
Thanks,
Avantika
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Kamaljit Bath <Ka...@microsoft.com>.
+1
Welcome, Avantika!
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-drewba@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:23 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1
Drew
________________________________________
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:47 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Avantika Agrawal
<t-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
+1. This Configuration UI will definitely be very useful.
Regards,
Shankar
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by "Drew Baird (Volt)" <a-...@microsoft.com>.
+1
Drew
________________________________________
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:47 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Avantika Agrawal
<t-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
+1. This Configuration UI will definitely be very useful.
Regards,
Shankar
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <ut...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Avantika Agrawal
<t-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
+1. This Configuration UI will definitely be very useful.
Regards,
Shankar
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Avantika Agrawal <t-...@microsoft.com>.
Hi Ben,
Thanks for this! I will definitely go through this stuff and let you know my ideas/questions.
Avantika
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:35 AM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Avantika,
First, I attached a patch to the STONEHENGE-21 ticket, this may be useful. It's very similar to the PHP Config service. It still needs namespaces added.
I think that the config contract, is a good place to start thinking about some FE designs. It should have the ability to (Add/Edit/ListServices, Get/Set ClientToBs Service, Get/Set BsToOps, Get/Set DB Config, etc).
Also, you may want to become familiar with the original MSFT Config App. You'll have to download and install it from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/bb499684.aspx. Disregard all of the load balancing config, that is out-of-scope for this ticket.
-Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:20 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
I think two implementations would be a good idea. I've installed the dotnet, java and php implementations and completed the interoperability walk-through. I am currently working on how to modify the design of the tables in the db.
I looked at the UI ticket, I will try and brainstorm some ideas for the FE. I'd be interested in hearing everyone's ideas.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:45 AM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> So both clients will have a config tab that's beefed up.
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-drewba@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:39 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> We will have one in php and one in .net
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:28 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Avantika,
>
> Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
>
> Shankar,
>
> Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g
.net , php)
If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can
use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this
with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one
in .net
WDYT?
Regards,
Shankar
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com>.
Avantika,
First, I attached a patch to the STONEHENGE-21 ticket, this may be useful. It's very similar to the PHP Config service. It still needs namespaces added.
I think that the config contract, is a good place to start thinking about some FE designs. It should have the ability to (Add/Edit/ListServices, Get/Set ClientToBs Service, Get/Set BsToOps, Get/Set DB Config, etc).
Also, you may want to become familiar with the original MSFT Config App. You'll have to download and install it from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/netframework/bb499684.aspx. Disregard all of the load balancing config, that is out-of-scope for this ticket.
-Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 1:20 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
I think two implementations would be a good idea. I've installed the dotnet, java and php implementations and completed the interoperability walk-through. I am currently working on how to modify the design of the tables in the db.
I looked at the UI ticket, I will try and brainstorm some ideas for the FE. I'd be interested in hearing everyone's ideas.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:45 AM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> So both clients will have a config tab that's beefed up.
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-drewba@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:39 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> We will have one in php and one in .net
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:28 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Avantika,
>
> Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
>
> Shankar,
>
> Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g
.net , php)
If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can
use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this
with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one
in .net
WDYT?
Regards,
Shankar
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Avantika Agrawal <t-...@microsoft.com>.
I think two implementations would be a good idea. I've installed the dotnet, java and php implementations and completed the interoperability walk-through. I am currently working on how to modify the design of the tables in the db.
I looked at the UI ticket, I will try and brainstorm some ideas for the FE. I'd be interested in hearing everyone's ideas.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Dewey [mailto:Ben.Dewey@26ny.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:45 AM
To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> So both clients will have a config tab that's beefed up.
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-drewba@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:39 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> We will have one in php and one in .net
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:28 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Avantika,
>
> Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
>
> Shankar,
>
> Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g
.net , php)
If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can
use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this
with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one
in .net
WDYT?
Regards,
Shankar
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com>.
+1 -> So both clients will have a config tab that's beefed up.
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-drewba@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 12:39 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
+1 -> We will have one in php and one in .net
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:28 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Avantika,
>
> Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
>
> Shankar,
>
> Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g
.net , php)
If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can
use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this
with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one
in .net
WDYT?
Regards,
Shankar
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by "Drew Baird (Volt)" <a-...@microsoft.com>.
+1 -> We will have one in php and one in .net
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:28 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Avantika,
>
> Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
>
> Shankar,
>
> Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g
.net , php)
If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can
use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this
with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one
in .net
WDYT?
Regards,
Shankar
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <ut...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> Avantika,
>
> Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
>
> Shankar,
>
> Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
Are we going to have only one implementation or one per platform? (e:g
.net , php)
If it is one, I prefer php (no, no, I am not biased :D ) since we can
use same in linux as well. Personally I feel we should integrate this
with our stocktrader frontend, so that we will have one in php and one
in .net
WDYT?
Regards,
Shankar
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
>
> Thanks,
> Avantika
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com>.
Avantika,
Glad to hear your enthusiasm. The reason I wanted to build a .NET config service is to provide a common interface for the Configuration UI (+1 btw). This is currently being discussed in the comments thread of ticket STONEHENGE-21 [1]. I put this on hold based on Shankar's recommendation that we should spec the UI before creating the .NET config service.
Shankar,
Can you please provide more detail regarding the best course of action for creating the Config UI. What were you thinking? Web interface, Desktop, CLI? What language/platform?
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-21
-----Original Message-----
From: Avantika Agrawal [mailto:t-avagra@microsoft.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 8:11 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Hi everyone,
My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
Thanks,
Avantika
RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Scott Golightly <Sc...@hotmail.com>.
+1
Also at the risk of unduly influencing your design I would love to see the
UI have everything I need to set up an endpoint but when I go to choose one
I would love to see it be either a list where I can choose 1 item or
something like a wizard where I can make choices and then incompatible
options will be unavailable. Of course how to do that will be the hard part
and may not be possible.
I have been requesting that Microsoft make such a tool for WCF for years
because all of the different configuration options and remembering what
works with what options seems to be a major point of confusion for people
just starting working with WCF web services.
Scott Golightly
-----Original Message-----
From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:chintanaw@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:27 AM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Avantika Agrawal
<t-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of
Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability
of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's
idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database
tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up
the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys
think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
+1
Bye,
-Chintana
--
http://engwar.com/
Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader
Posted by Chintana Wilamuna <ch...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Avantika Agrawal
<t-...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> My name is Avantika Agrawal; I am undergrad student at the University of Pennsylvania, interning at Microsoft for the summer.
>
> I recently joined the Stonehenge DL, in hopes of improving the usability of the StockTrader Interop demo. In particular, I am interested in Ben's idea of a dotnet configuration service that uses the existing database tables. I was also thinking of designing a UI that allows the user to set up the configuration without going into the database. Let me know what you guys think.
>
> I look forward to working with all of you on Stonehenge!
+1
Bye,
-Chintana
--
http://engwar.com/