You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> on 2022/06/15 13:05:27 UTC
[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Hey all,
I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18 Jun
14:40:07 CEST 2022.
Consider this my (binding) +1.
This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an important bug-fix
(also oracle provider which is optional dependency of the google provider).
Airflow Providers are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
*apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
packages.
*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
Python "wheel" release.
The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC candidates
are described in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
and for Contributors:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
Public keys are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
the artifact checksums when we actually release.
The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24471
You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.1.0rc1/
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/3.1.0rc1/
Cheers,
J
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1 checked licenses, and checksums
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 20:57, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Yeah... I've learned since that there was a looooong weekend in US. There
> was one in Poland but it started on Thursday so seems like
> looooongish weekends overlapped :D
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 PM Jed Cunningham <je...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry Jarek, I was gone for a few days.
>>
>> +1 (binding) - checked sigs, licenses, and checksums
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Yeah... I've learned since that there was a looooong weekend in US. There
was one in Poland but it started on Thursday so seems like
looooongish weekends overlapped :D
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:53 PM Jed Cunningham <je...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> Sorry Jarek, I was gone for a few days.
>
> +1 (binding) - checked sigs, licenses, and checksums
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Jed Cunningham <je...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
Sorry Jarek, I was gone for a few days.
+1 (binding) - checked sigs, licenses, and checksums
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Hello...... Is it me ?
[image: 4225740.jpg]
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:06 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Need some PMC +1 s:)
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:03 PM Austin Bennett <
> whatwouldaustindo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I could probably help verify some of these things by early/mid-week ( via
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>> ), but also wouldn't be casting a binding vote so no need to be heldup on
>> me.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:36 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone :) ?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:50 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some +1s would be great so I can release them tomorrow :)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:05 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>>>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18
>>>>> Jun 14:40:07 CEST 2022.
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an important
>>>>> bug-fix (also oracle provider which is optional dependency of the google
>>>>> provider).
>>>>>
>>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>>>
>>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>>>>> provider packages.
>>>>>
>>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>>>
>>>>> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
>>>>> candidates are described in
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>>>>>
>>>>> and for Contributors:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Public keys are available at:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>>>>> are
>>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>>>
>>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24471
>>>>>
>>>>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the
>>>>> below links:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.1.0rc1/
>>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/3.1.0rc1/
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> J
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Need some PMC +1 s:)
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:03 PM Austin Bennett <wh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I could probably help verify some of these things by early/mid-week ( via
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
> ), but also wouldn't be casting a binding vote so no need to be heldup on
> me.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:36 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Anyone :) ?
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:50 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Some +1s would be great so I can release them tomorrow :)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:05 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18
>>>> Jun 14:40:07 CEST 2022.
>>>>
>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>>
>>>> This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an important bug-fix
>>>> (also oracle provider which is optional dependency of the google provider).
>>>>
>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>>
>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>>>> provider packages.
>>>>
>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>>
>>>> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
>>>> candidates are described in
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>>>>
>>>> and for Contributors:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Public keys are available at:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>>>> are
>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>>
>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>>
>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24471
>>>>
>>>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
>>>> links:
>>>>
>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.1.0rc1/
>>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/3.1.0rc1/
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> J
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Austin Bennett <wh...@gmail.com>.
I could probably help verify some of these things by early/mid-week ( via
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
), but also wouldn't be casting a binding vote so no need to be heldup on
me.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 8:36 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Anyone :) ?
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:50 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Some +1s would be great so I can release them tomorrow :)
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:05 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18
>>> Jun 14:40:07 CEST 2022.
>>>
>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>
>>> This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an important bug-fix
>>> (also oracle provider which is optional dependency of the google provider).
>>>
>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>
>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>>> provider packages.
>>>
>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>
>>> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
>>> candidates are described in
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>>>
>>> and for Contributors:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>>>
>>>
>>> Public keys are available at:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>>
>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>
>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>
>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24471
>>>
>>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
>>> links:
>>>
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.1.0rc1/
>>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/3.1.0rc1/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> J
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Anyone :) ?
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:50 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Some +1s would be great so I can release them tomorrow :)
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:05 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>> calling a vote on the release,
>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18 Jun
>> 14:40:07 CEST 2022.
>>
>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>
>> This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an important bug-fix
>> (also oracle provider which is optional dependency of the google provider).
>>
>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>
>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>> provider packages.
>>
>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>> Python "wheel" release.
>>
>> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
>> candidates are described in
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>>
>> and for Contributors:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>>
>>
>> Public keys are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>>
>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>
>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>
>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24471
>>
>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
>> links:
>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.1.0rc1/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/3.1.0rc1/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> J
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on June 15, 2022
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Some +1s would be great so I can release them tomorrow :)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:05 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Sat 18 Jun
> 14:40:07 CEST 2022.
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
> This is an ad-hoc release of Google provider with an important bug-fix
> (also oracle provider which is optional dependency of the google provider).
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> provider packages.
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> Python "wheel" release.
>
> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
> candidates are described in
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>
> and for Contributors:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/24471
>
> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
> links:
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.1.0rc1/
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/3.1.0rc1/
>
> Cheers,
> J
>