You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Charles Gregory <cg...@hwcn.org> on 2009/06/13 16:25:54 UTC
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
> .... my life comes before no-life whinging fucking cry baby lamers like
> you.
I'm always amused by the hyporcrisy of people who spend paragraphs of text
explaining that the person they are addressing is 'not worth their time'.
- C
RE: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by RobertH <ro...@abbacomm.net>.
Blazing Fast Slap ya twice for ya know it JH wrote:
> A word of advice, though: your rants would be a great deal
> more impressive and might actually generate some respect for
> your opinions if they displayed a greater degree of
> sophistication than that possessed by an average seventh-grader.
>
whoa!!!
john john john,
dont dis on the 7th graders... ;-)
some of them are smarter than we ever were, so to speak...
as necessary though, get 'dem *moron* guns out and ready padner :-)
- rh
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Res <re...@ausics.net>.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, John Hardin wrote:
>> Last time I looked, Justin ran this list, not you.
>
> you, and if Justin has a problem with it _he_ can take care of it.
Exactly.
>
> A word of advice, though: your rants would be a great deal more impressive
Errr, I'm not here to impress anyone
> and might actually generate some respect for your opinions if they displayed
I only care that my friends respect me (as I respect them), none of my
friends on this list, I'm not here to make friends, I hav enough already.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>>
>> > It's the weekend and I was bored :)
>>
>> This list does not exist to provide you amusement.
>
> Last time I looked, Justin ran this list, not you.
That's true. Fair enough, comment withdrawn. Behave in whatever manner
suits you, and if Justin has a problem with it _he_ can take care of it.
A word of advice, though: your rants would be a great deal more impressive
and might actually generate some respect for your opinions if they
displayed a greater degree of sophistication than that possessed by an
average seventh-grader.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no doubt in my mind that millions of lives could have been
saved if the people were not "brainwashed" about gun ownership and
had been well armed. ... Gun haters always want to forget the Warsaw
Ghetto uprising, which is a perfect example of how a ragtag,
half-starved group of Jews took 10 handguns and made asses out of
the Nazis. -- Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4 days until SWMBO's Birthday
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Res <re...@ausics.net>.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>
>> It's the weekend and I was bored :)
>
> This list does not exist to provide you amusement.
Last time I looked, Justin ran this list, not you.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by LuKreme <kr...@kreme.com>.
On 13-Jun-2009, at 18:21, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>> It's the weekend and I was bored :)
>
> This list does not exist to provide you amusement.
Are you sure about that?
--
I gotta straighten my face This mellow-thighed chick just put my
spine out of place
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
> It's the weekend and I was bored :)
This list does not exist to provide you amusement.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The yardstick you should use when considering whether to support a
given piece of legislation is "what if my worst enemy is chosen to
administer this law?"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until SWMBO's Birthday
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Res <re...@ausics.net>.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
> A killfile. That would be the place to put "cry babies" wouldn't it?
> Good idea. Glad you thought of it. Go do it. Add me while you're at it.
Sorry dont use em, I save sooks like you for rainy weekends so i can have
more fun when I'm bored.
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Charles Gregory <cg...@hwcn.org>.
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>> > Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that
>> > includes sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect
>> > people involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
>> So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
>> .....and the one after it. :)
>
> That's perfectly acceptable, if you need help with setting me in a killfile,
> I'll be more than happy to assist :)
A killfile. That would be the place to put "cry babies" wouldn't it?
Good idea. Glad you thought of it. Go do it. Add me while you're at it.
- Charles
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Res <re...@ausics.net>.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Bill Landry wrote:
> Maybe you could add your email address to your outbound mail server's
> killfile. I know that would deprive the world of your comic relief, but
What, and not have the delight of showing you for the sook and demanding
whiner that you are? not a chance :)
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by mouss <mo...@ml.netoyen.net>.
Bill Landry a écrit :
>> Bill Landry a écrit :
>>> Res wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>>>>>> Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that
>>>>>> includes sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect
>>>>>> people involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
>>>>> So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
>>>>>
>>>>> .....and the one after it. :)
>>>> That's perfectly acceptable, if you need help with setting me in a
>>>> killfile, I'll be more than happy to assist :)
>>> Maybe you could add your email address to your outbound mail server's
>>> killfile. I know that would deprive the world of your comic relief, but
>>> it would also allow the rest of us to focus on "real" list related
>>> issues without unnecessary distractions, and it would give you ample
>>> time to focus on improving your grammar, spelling and people skills.
>>> Sounds like a real win/win situation to me...
>>>
>> Bill,
>>
>> I think you'll agree with me that it is time to stop feeding <censored/>
>
> Yes, I agree - I'm done now.
>
just to avoid Res taking this too bad: there is nothing personal. this
is strictly related to _this_ thread.
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Bill Landry <bi...@inetmsg.com>.
> Bill Landry a écrit :
>> Res wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>>>>> Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that
>>>>> includes sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect
>>>>> people involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
>>>> So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
>>>>
>>>> .....and the one after it. :)
>>> That's perfectly acceptable, if you need help with setting me in a
>>> killfile, I'll be more than happy to assist :)
>>
>> Maybe you could add your email address to your outbound mail server's
>> killfile. I know that would deprive the world of your comic relief, but
>> it would also allow the rest of us to focus on "real" list related
>> issues without unnecessary distractions, and it would give you ample
>> time to focus on improving your grammar, spelling and people skills.
>> Sounds like a real win/win situation to me...
>>
>
> Bill,
>
> I think you'll agree with me that it is time to stop feeding <censored/>
Yes, I agree - I'm done now.
Bill
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by mouss <mo...@ml.netoyen.net>.
Bill Landry a écrit :
> Res wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>>>> Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that
>>>> includes sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect
>>>> people involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
>>> So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
>>>
>>> .....and the one after it. :)
>> That's perfectly acceptable, if you need help with setting me in a
>> killfile, I'll be more than happy to assist :)
>
> Maybe you could add your email address to your outbound mail server's
> killfile. I know that would deprive the world of your comic relief, but
> it would also allow the rest of us to focus on "real" list related
> issues without unnecessary distractions, and it would give you ample
> time to focus on improving your grammar, spelling and people skills.
> Sounds like a real win/win situation to me...
>
Bill,
I think you'll agree with me that it is time to stop feeding <censored/>
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Bill Landry <bi...@inetmsg.com>.
Res wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>>> Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that
>>> includes sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect
>>> people involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
>>
>> So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
>>
>> .....and the one after it. :)
>
> That's perfectly acceptable, if you need help with setting me in a
> killfile, I'll be more than happy to assist :)
Maybe you could add your email address to your outbound mail server's
killfile. I know that would deprive the world of your comic relief, but
it would also allow the rest of us to focus on "real" list related
issues without unnecessary distractions, and it would give you ample
time to focus on improving your grammar, spelling and people skills.
Sounds like a real win/win situation to me...
Bill
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Res <re...@ausics.net>.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
>> Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that includes
>> sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect people involved
>> in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
>
> So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
>
> .....and the one after it. :)
That's perfectly acceptable, if you need help with setting me in a
killfile, I'll be more than happy to assist :)
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Charles Gregory <cg...@hwcn.org>.
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Res wrote:
> Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that includes
> sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect people involved
> in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
So we'll just all pretend you didn't send this message.....
.....and the one after it. :)
Re: [sa] Re: BOTNET timeouts?
Posted by Res <re...@ausics.net>.
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Charles Gregory wrote:
> I'm always amused by the hyporcrisy of people who spend paragraphs of text
> explaining that the person they are addressing is 'not worth their time'.
It's the weekend and I was bored :)
Though now its Sunday, I have socialising to do, and none of that includes
sitting on mailing lists listening to cry babies who expect people
involved in OSSP's to drop everything and be their servants.
TTFN
--
Res
-Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers