You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com> on 2009/03/27 22:28:33 UTC
A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Hi, is my first question in the list.
I have a problem with tomcat 6.0.18, so, before I used tomcat 6.0.16 and
everything works fine, but when I upgrade to tomcat 6.0.18 the line
<c:forEach begin="1" end="#{unidadeAdm.tamCk}"> gives me a exception.
Cannot convert 20 of type class java.lang.Integer to class java.lang.Number.
I don't know what happens, but I have to use tomcat 6.0.18 and not
6.0.169 version.
Thanks and sorry for the bad english.
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
Oh realy, sorry, I put the class in endorsed paste of tomcat and every thing
works fine!! thanks for the help!
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > wich change you make in this class? where I get this
> > class?
>
> I already e-mailed the updated source and class file to you privately,
> about 5.5 hours ago. (The Tomcat mailing list filters out most
> attachments.) If you didn't get the e-mail, let me know and we'll try it
> some other way.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> wich change you make in this class? where I get this
> class?
I already e-mailed the updated source and class file to you privately, about 5.5 hours ago. (The Tomcat mailing list filters out most attachments.) If you didn't get the e-mail, let me know and we'll try it some other way.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
exactly, so, wich change you make in this class? where I get this class?thanks
a lot!
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > Ok, here is the test case! Remember, on tomcat 6.0.18!
> > http://rapidshare.com/files/214651452/dldNew.war.html
>
> This is the result of running your .war with the modified
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport class:
>
> asdadassd
>
> Is that what's expected? Is anything in addition expected?
>
> Running with the unmodified class does result in the exception your
> reported.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
OK! thanks a lot!!!
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > yeah, now everything works fine! But your only change been remove the
> > method: final coerceToNumber(final Number number, final Class type); ?
>
> And change the line that called it. Do a diff to see the changes.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> yeah, now everything works fine! But your only change been remove the
> method: final coerceToNumber(final Number number, final Class type); ?
And change the line that called it. Do a diff to see the changes.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
yeah, now everything works fine! But your only change been remove the
method: final coerceToNumber(final Number number, final Class type); ?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > I dont receive this update! I only received the email at 12:55
>
> Please convert times to UTC/GMT, since neither of us know the other's time
> zone.
>
> I only sent you one private e-mail with attachments; there were no changes
> after that. You apparently got it, since your previous posting to the list
> indicated things are now working.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> I dont receive this update! I only received the email at 12:55
Please convert times to UTC/GMT, since neither of us know the other's time zone.
I only sent you one private e-mail with attachments; there were no changes after that. You apparently got it, since your previous posting to the list indicated things are now working.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
I dont receive this update! I only received the email at 12:55
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > so which modifications I have to do in this class?
>
> I sent you the updated source and class file at 15:55 GMT; did you get it?
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> so which modifications I have to do in this class?
I sent you the updated source and class file at 15:55 GMT; did you get it?
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
O sorry, I get the class in the source of tomcat, so which modifications I
have to do in this class?
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > Ok, here is the test case! Remember, on tomcat 6.0.18!
> > http://rapidshare.com/files/214651452/dldNew.war.html
>
> This is the result of running your .war with the modified
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport class:
>
> asdadassd
>
> Is that what's expected? Is anything in addition expected?
>
> Running with the unmodified class does result in the exception your
> reported.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> if I change the property end from Integer to Long, than works.
That's a workaround, but not a proper fix. I'm still working on updating ELSupport.java to better handle arbitrary Number classes, but it's proving to be tricky.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
if I change the property end from Integer to Long, than works.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > in other app I get one error little different bu referent the same
> > class.
> >
> > java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to
> > java.lang.Long
> > org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.compare(ELSupport.java:81)
>
> I was afraid what I gave you might be incomplete; will look into it.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> in other app I get one error little different bu referent the same
> class.
>
> java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to
> java.lang.Long
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.compare(ELSupport.java:81)
I was afraid what I gave you might be incomplete; will look into it.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
Hi, in other app I get one error little different bu referent the same
class.
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Integer cannot be cast to java.lang.Long
org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.compare(ELSupport.java:81)
org.apache.el.parser.AstGreaterThan.getValue(AstGreaterThan.java:45)
org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:186)
com.sun.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:71)
com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute.getObject(TagAttribute.java:233)
com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute.getBoolean(TagAttribute.java:79)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jstl.core.IfHandler.apply(IfHandler.java:49)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jstl.core.ForEachHandler.apply(ForEachHandler.java:175)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.applyNextHandler(ComponentHandler.java:314)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.apply(ComponentHandler.java:169)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.DefineHandler.applyDefinition(DefineHandler.java:64)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:131)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext$TemplateManager.apply(DefaultFaceletContext.java:310)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeDefinition(DefaultFaceletContext.java:280)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.InsertHandler.apply(InsertHandler.java:68)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.applyNextHandler(ComponentHandler.java:314)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.apply(ComponentHandler.java:169)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:49)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:25)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:248)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:294)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:273)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeFacelet(DefaultFaceletContext.java:144)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:113)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:49)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:25)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.apply(DefaultFacelet.java:95)
com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler.buildView(FaceletViewHandler.java:524)
com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler.renderView(FaceletViewHandler.java:567)
org.ajax4jsf.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.renderView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:108)
org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:189)
com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:109)
com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100)
com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:139)
javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:266)
org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseXMLFilter.doXmlFilter(BaseXMLFilter.java:147)
org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.doFilter(BaseFilter.java:276)
org.ajax4jsf.Filter.doFilter(Filter.java:175)
br.gov.pbh.mcp.is.filter.EncodingFilter.doFilter(EncodingFilter.java:33)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:265)
org.acegisecurity.ui.ExceptionTranslationFilter.doFilter(ExceptionTranslationFilter.java:124)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
org.acegisecurity.ui.AbstractProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractProcessingFilter.java:271)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
org.acegisecurity.context.HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.doFilter(HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.java:249)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:149)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy.doFilter(FilterToBeanProxy.java:98)
org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.doFilterInternal(OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.java:111)
org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:75)
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Martin Gainty <mg...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> same here
>
> asdadassd
>
> Martin--
> ______________________________________________
> Disclaimer and confidentiality note
> This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
> intended recipient, we kindly ask you to please inform the sender. Any
> unauthorised dissemination or copying hereof is prohibited. This message
> serves for information purposes only and shall not have any legally binding
> effect. Given that e-mails can easily be subject to manipulation, we can not
> accept any liability for the content provided.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com
> > To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> > Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:18:26 -0500
> > Subject: RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> > >
> > > Ok, here is the test case! Remember, on tomcat 6.0.18!
> > > http://rapidshare.com/files/214651452/dldNew.war.html
> >
> > This is the result of running your .war with the modified
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport class:
> >
> > asdadassd
> >
> > Is that what's expected? Is anything in addition expected?
> >
> > Running with the unmodified class does result in the exception your
> reported.
> >
> > - Chuck
> >
> >
> > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
> http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Martin Gainty <mg...@hotmail.com>.
same here
asdadassd
Martin--
______________________________________________
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
This message is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, we kindly ask you to please inform the sender. Any unauthorised dissemination or copying hereof is prohibited. This message serves for information purposes only and shall not have any legally binding effect. Given that e-mails can easily be subject to manipulation, we can not accept any liability for the content provided.
> From: Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:18:26 -0500
> Subject: RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > Ok, here is the test case! Remember, on tomcat 6.0.18!
> > http://rapidshare.com/files/214651452/dldNew.war.html
>
> This is the result of running your .war with the modified org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport class:
>
> asdadassd
>
> Is that what's expected? Is anything in addition expected?
>
> Running with the unmodified class does result in the exception your reported.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> Ok, here is the test case! Remember, on tomcat 6.0.18!
> http://rapidshare.com/files/214651452/dldNew.war.html
This is the result of running your .war with the modified org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport class:
asdadassd
Is that what's expected? Is anything in addition expected?
Running with the unmodified class does result in the exception your reported.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
Ok, here is the test case! Remember, on tomcat 6.0.18!
http://rapidshare.com/files/214651452/dldNew.war.html
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Caldarale, Charles R <
Chuck.Caldarale@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> > Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
> >
> > the stack trace is:
> >
> > java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot convert 20 of type class
> > java.lang.Integer to class java.lang.Number
> > org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:252)
> > org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:265)
> > org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToType(ELSupport.java:353)
>
> I've just looked through the code in ElSupport, and I'm mystified as to why
> much of it is there at all. In particular, the method:
> static Number coerceToNumber(final Number number, final Class type)
> doesn't appear to accomplish anything other than throw the exception that's
> causing this particular grief. Since the object being tested is already
> known to be a subclass of java.lang.Number, converting it to another
> subclass of java.lang.Number seems to be a complete waste of time; the
> original object should suffice to fulfill the contract of the API.
>
> I've e-mailed the OP a modified version of ElSupport; put the .class file
> in the proper subdirectory of Tomcat's lib directory, restart Tomcat, and
> see if that addresses the problem.
>
> As pid pointed out, a simple test case would help if and when this patch is
> submitted for review.
>
> - Chuck
>
>
> THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
> MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
> attachments from all computers.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
RE: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by "Caldarale, Charles R" <Ch...@unisys.com>.
> From: Paulo Vitor [mailto:foxpv213@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
>
> the stack trace is:
>
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot convert 20 of type class
> java.lang.Integer to class java.lang.Number
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:252)
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:265)
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToType(ELSupport.java:353)
I've just looked through the code in ElSupport, and I'm mystified as to why much of it is there at all. In particular, the method:
static Number coerceToNumber(final Number number, final Class type)
doesn't appear to accomplish anything other than throw the exception that's causing this particular grief. Since the object being tested is already known to be a subclass of java.lang.Number, converting it to another subclass of java.lang.Number seems to be a complete waste of time; the original object should suffice to fulfill the contract of the API.
I've e-mailed the OP a modified version of ElSupport; put the .class file in the proper subdirectory of Tomcat's lib directory, restart Tomcat, and see if that addresses the problem.
As pid pointed out, a simple test case would help if and when this patch is submitted for review.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Pid <p...@pidster.com>.
Paulo Vitor wrote:
> the stack trace is:
>
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot convert 20 of type class
> java.lang.Integer to class java.lang.Number
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:252)
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:265)
> org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToType(ELSupport.java:353)
> org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:188)
> com.sun.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:71)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute.getObject(TagAttribute.java:233)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute.getInt(TagAttribute.java:100)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.jstl.core.ForEachHandler.getEnd(ForEachHandler.java:216)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.jstl.core.ForEachHandler.apply(ForEachHandler.java:110)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.applyNextHandler(ComponentHandler.java:314)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.apply(ComponentHandler.java:169)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.DefineHandler.applyDefinition(DefineHandler.java:64)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:131)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext$TemplateManager.apply(DefaultFaceletContext.java:310)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeDefinition(DefaultFaceletContext.java:280)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.InsertHandler.apply(InsertHandler.java:68)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.applyNextHandler(ComponentHandler.java:314)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.apply(ComponentHandler.java:169)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
> com.sun.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:49)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
> com.sun.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:25)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:248)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:294)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:273)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeFacelet(DefaultFaceletContext.java:144)
> com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:113)
> com.sun.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:49)
> com.sun.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:25)
> com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.apply(DefaultFacelet.java:95)
> com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler.buildView(FaceletViewHandler.java:524)
> com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler.renderView(FaceletViewHandler.java:567)
> org.ajax4jsf.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.renderView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:108)
> org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:189)
> com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:109)
> com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100)
> com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:139)
> javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:266)
> org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseXMLFilter.doXmlFilter(BaseXMLFilter.java:147)
> org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.doFilter(BaseFilter.java:276)
> org.ajax4jsf.Filter.doFilter(Filter.java:175)
> br.gov.pbh.mcp.is.filter.EncodingFilter.doFilter(EncodingFilter.java:33)
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:265)
> org.acegisecurity.ui.ExceptionTranslationFilter.doFilter(ExceptionTranslationFilter.java:124)
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
> org.acegisecurity.ui.AbstractProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractProcessingFilter.java:271)
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
> org.acegisecurity.context.HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.doFilter(HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.java:249)
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:149)
> org.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy.doFilter(FilterToBeanProxy.java:98)
> org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.doFilterInternal(OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.java:111)
>
>
> org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:75)
>
> And the test is simple, just put one c:foreach in a xhtml page like this:
> <c:forEach begin="1" end="#{unidadeAdm.tamCk}">
> and the tamCk is a property of unidadeAdm bean. In tomcat 6.0.18 you will se
> the above exception!
this is not a test case.
please make a small webapp (test.war) that reproduces this error.
p
> tranks for the answer!
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Christopher Schultz <
> chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
>
> Paulo,
>
> On 3/27/2009 5:28 PM, Paulo Vitor wrote:
>>>> I have a problem with tomcat 6.0.18, so, before I used tomcat 6.0.16 and
>>>> everything works fine, but when I upgrade to tomcat 6.0.18 the line
>>>> <c:forEach begin="1" end="#{unidadeAdm.tamCk}"> gives me a exception.
>>>>
>>>> Cannot convert 20 of type class java.lang.Integer to class
> java.lang.Number.
>
> Interesting. I checked the changelog
> (http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/changelog.html) and it looks
> like this might be the problem you're seeing:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
>
> Perhaps this is a regression?
>
> Can you please post the entire stack trace?
>
> Also, can you create a small test case that reproduces the problem, but
> does not require your entire application to test?
>
>>>> Thanks and sorry for the bad english.
> If you provide a Tomcat version number and a decent explanation of the
> problem (which you did), we'd be happy to read your bad English ;)
>
> -chris
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Paulo Vitor <fo...@gmail.com>.
the stack trace is:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Cannot convert 20 of type class
java.lang.Integer to class java.lang.Number
org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:252)
org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToNumber(ELSupport.java:265)
org.apache.el.lang.ELSupport.coerceToType(ELSupport.java:353)
org.apache.el.ValueExpressionImpl.getValue(ValueExpressionImpl.java:188)
com.sun.facelets.el.TagValueExpression.getValue(TagValueExpression.java:71)
com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute.getObject(TagAttribute.java:233)
com.sun.facelets.tag.TagAttribute.getInt(TagAttribute.java:100)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jstl.core.ForEachHandler.getEnd(ForEachHandler.java:216)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jstl.core.ForEachHandler.apply(ForEachHandler.java:110)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.applyNextHandler(ComponentHandler.java:314)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.apply(ComponentHandler.java:169)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.DefineHandler.applyDefinition(DefineHandler.java:64)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:131)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext$TemplateManager.apply(DefaultFaceletContext.java:310)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeDefinition(DefaultFaceletContext.java:280)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.InsertHandler.apply(InsertHandler.java:68)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.applyNextHandler(ComponentHandler.java:314)
com.sun.facelets.tag.jsf.ComponentHandler.apply(ComponentHandler.java:169)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:49)
com.sun.facelets.tag.CompositeFaceletHandler.apply(CompositeFaceletHandler.java:47)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:25)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:248)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:294)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.include(DefaultFacelet.java:273)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFaceletContext.includeFacelet(DefaultFaceletContext.java:144)
com.sun.facelets.tag.ui.CompositionHandler.apply(CompositionHandler.java:113)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.NamespaceHandler.apply(NamespaceHandler.java:49)
com.sun.facelets.compiler.EncodingHandler.apply(EncodingHandler.java:25)
com.sun.facelets.impl.DefaultFacelet.apply(DefaultFacelet.java:95)
com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler.buildView(FaceletViewHandler.java:524)
com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler.renderView(FaceletViewHandler.java:567)
org.ajax4jsf.application.ViewHandlerWrapper.renderView(ViewHandlerWrapper.java:108)
org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:189)
com.sun.faces.lifecycle.RenderResponsePhase.execute(RenderResponsePhase.java:109)
com.sun.faces.lifecycle.Phase.doPhase(Phase.java:100)
com.sun.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:139)
javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:266)
org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseXMLFilter.doXmlFilter(BaseXMLFilter.java:147)
org.ajax4jsf.webapp.BaseFilter.doFilter(BaseFilter.java:276)
org.ajax4jsf.Filter.doFilter(Filter.java:175)
br.gov.pbh.mcp.is.filter.EncodingFilter.doFilter(EncodingFilter.java:33)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:265)
org.acegisecurity.ui.ExceptionTranslationFilter.doFilter(ExceptionTranslationFilter.java:124)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
org.acegisecurity.ui.AbstractProcessingFilter.doFilter(AbstractProcessingFilter.java:271)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
org.acegisecurity.context.HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.doFilter(HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter.java:249)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy$VirtualFilterChain.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:275)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterChainProxy.doFilter(FilterChainProxy.java:149)
org.acegisecurity.util.FilterToBeanProxy.doFilter(FilterToBeanProxy.java:98)
org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.doFilterInternal(OpenEntityManagerInViewFilter.java:111)
org.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:75)
And the test is simple, just put one c:foreach in a xhtml page like this:
<c:forEach begin="1" end="#{unidadeAdm.tamCk}">
and the tamCk is a property of unidadeAdm bean. In tomcat 6.0.18 you will se
the above exception!
tranks for the answer!
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Christopher Schultz <
chris@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Paulo,
>
> On 3/27/2009 5:28 PM, Paulo Vitor wrote:
> > I have a problem with tomcat 6.0.18, so, before I used tomcat 6.0.16 and
> > everything works fine, but when I upgrade to tomcat 6.0.18 the line
> > <c:forEach begin="1" end="#{unidadeAdm.tamCk}"> gives me a exception.
> >
> > Cannot convert 20 of type class java.lang.Integer to class
> java.lang.Number.
>
> Interesting. I checked the changelog
> (http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/changelog.html) and it looks
> like this might be the problem you're seeing:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
>
> Perhaps this is a regression?
>
> Can you please post the entire stack trace?
>
> Also, can you create a small test case that reproduces the problem, but
> does not require your entire application to test?
>
> > Thanks and sorry for the bad english.
>
> If you provide a Tomcat version number and a decent explanation of the
> problem (which you did), we'd be happy to read your bad English ;)
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAknNTXIACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PC62QCgovYBWc2ILMHg6zsn5KFKAffy
> FjEAnjhfy3j7sjQh4cdyK8WJ8e/TBVFL
> =nQzs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
Re: A problem with tomcat 6.0.18
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Paulo,
On 3/27/2009 5:28 PM, Paulo Vitor wrote:
> I have a problem with tomcat 6.0.18, so, before I used tomcat 6.0.16 and
> everything works fine, but when I upgrade to tomcat 6.0.18 the line
> <c:forEach begin="1" end="#{unidadeAdm.tamCk}"> gives me a exception.
>
> Cannot convert 20 of type class java.lang.Integer to class java.lang.Number.
Interesting. I checked the changelog
(http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/changelog.html) and it looks
like this might be the problem you're seeing:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
Perhaps this is a regression?
Can you please post the entire stack trace?
Also, can you create a small test case that reproduces the problem, but
does not require your entire application to test?
> Thanks and sorry for the bad english.
If you provide a Tomcat version number and a decent explanation of the
problem (which you did), we'd be happy to read your bad English ;)
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAknNTXIACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PC62QCgovYBWc2ILMHg6zsn5KFKAffy
FjEAnjhfy3j7sjQh4cdyK8WJ8e/TBVFL
=nQzs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org