You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@shindig.apache.org by Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com> on 2014/09/29 01:23:35 UTC
Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Hi Team,
I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/campaigns/todo/todo.xml
I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and tomcat
server.
I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration for
Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
Below are some details about system/application
- Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using my
site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
- Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
- Server Ram - 130GB Ram
- SSD Drives on server
- Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150, connection
timeout - 60sec
Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone let
me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which will
make it really really fast. That would be great.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Raj
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by Stanton Sievers <ss...@apache.org>.
There's a performance report published by IBM for one of their products
that uses Shindig under the covers [1].
The server size is given for the system running Shindig and the cpu
utilization is given while rendering embedded experiences. While this
isn't going to be your exact use case by a good margin, it should at least
help to give you a ballpark estimate.
I hope that helps.
-Stanton
[1]
http://www-10.lotus.com/ldd/dominowiki.nsf/m_Home.xsp?documentId=33492FD968F6B9AB85257B4E0048265B#mobileViewer
Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity or typos.
On Oct 1, 2014 9:36 PM, "Ryan Baxter" <rb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yes if memory serves me correctly that was the case.
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thank you Ryan,
> >
> > Do you mean up to 1000 concurrent users on tomcat/shindig can perform
> really
> > well?
> >
> > If that is the case then i think i would be having only 500 to 700
> > concurrent users at any given point. so i guess it will suit very well
> for
> > my application.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raj
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have seen Shindig perform well for 1000 or so users on a machine
> >> that is far inferior than the one you are using Raj. At the end of
> >> day I guess it all depends on the # of concurrent users you have,
> >> every machine has its limits,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Matt
> >> >
> >> > I am using shindig 2.5.1 ( the latest release ).
> >> >
> >> > My application is entirely build in php mysql except shindig so i need
> >> > to
> >> > use both apache for php and tomcat for shindig, and in order to run
> that
> >> > on
> >> > same domain i need to use ajp to frontend shindig.
> >> >
> >> > I got hifi server so really having 2000 thread i dont think an issue.
> >> >
> >> > I am just concern about the performance of shindig gadget rendering it
> >> > is
> >> > fast but was thinking and getting people opinion here to make it
> really
> >> > really fast if possible.
> >> >
> >> > Otherwise i am happy with how it is now.
> >> >
> >> > May be Ryan can share some info here.
> >> >
> >> > Thank you
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Raj
> >> >
> >> > On Monday, September 29, 2014, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Raj,
> >> >>
> >> >> Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
> >> >>
> >> >> I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0
> >> >> to
> >> >> Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
> >> >> created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0
> that
> >> >> same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes
> >> >> me
> >> >> think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
> >> >>
> >> >> I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
> >> >> implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
> >> >> through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig
> >> >> 2.0
> >> >> and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff.
> >> >> Instead,
> >> >> we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if
> >> >> that¹s
> >> >> still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think
> >> >> about
> >> >> as well if performance is an issue for you.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Matt
> >> >>
> >> >> On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janorkar@gmail.com
> >> >> <javascript:;>>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hi Team,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
> >> >> >aigns/todo/todo.xml
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only
> for
> >> >> >shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
> >> >> >tomcat
> >> >> >server.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >I would like to know from experts that what is the best
> configuration
> >> >> > for
> >> >> >Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Below are some details about system/application
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users
> using
> >> >> > my
> >> >> > site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
> >> >> > - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
> >> >> > - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
> >> >> > - SSD Drives on server
> >> >> > - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
> >> >> >connection
> >> >> > timeout - 60sec
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if
> >> >> > anyone
> >> >> >let
> >> >> >me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which
> >> >> > will
> >> >> >make it really really fast. That would be great.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Thank you very much.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Regards,
> >> >> >Raj
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@apache.org>.
Yes if memory serves me correctly that was the case.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Ryan,
>
> Do you mean up to 1000 concurrent users on tomcat/shindig can perform really
> well?
>
> If that is the case then i think i would be having only 500 to 700
> concurrent users at any given point. so i guess it will suit very well for
> my application.
>
> Thank you
>
> Regards,
> Raj
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I have seen Shindig perform well for 1000 or so users on a machine
>> that is far inferior than the one you are using Raj. At the end of
>> day I guess it all depends on the # of concurrent users you have,
>> every machine has its limits,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Matt
>> >
>> > I am using shindig 2.5.1 ( the latest release ).
>> >
>> > My application is entirely build in php mysql except shindig so i need
>> > to
>> > use both apache for php and tomcat for shindig, and in order to run that
>> > on
>> > same domain i need to use ajp to frontend shindig.
>> >
>> > I got hifi server so really having 2000 thread i dont think an issue.
>> >
>> > I am just concern about the performance of shindig gadget rendering it
>> > is
>> > fast but was thinking and getting people opinion here to make it really
>> > really fast if possible.
>> >
>> > Otherwise i am happy with how it is now.
>> >
>> > May be Ryan can share some info here.
>> >
>> > Thank you
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Raj
>> >
>> > On Monday, September 29, 2014, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Raj,
>> >>
>> >> Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
>> >>
>> >> I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0
>> >> to
>> >> Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
>> >> created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
>> >> same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes
>> >> me
>> >> think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
>> >>
>> >> I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
>> >> implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
>> >> through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig
>> >> 2.0
>> >> and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff.
>> >> Instead,
>> >> we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if
>> >> that¹s
>> >> still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think
>> >> about
>> >> as well if performance is an issue for you.
>> >>
>> >> -Matt
>> >>
>> >> On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janorkar@gmail.com
>> >> <javascript:;>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hi Team,
>> >> >
>> >> >I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
>> >> >aigns/todo/todo.xml
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
>> >> >shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
>> >> >tomcat
>> >> >server.
>> >> >
>> >> >I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration
>> >> > for
>> >> >Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
>> >> >
>> >> >Below are some details about system/application
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using
>> >> > my
>> >> > site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
>> >> > - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
>> >> > - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
>> >> > - SSD Drives on server
>> >> > - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
>> >> >connection
>> >> > timeout - 60sec
>> >> >
>> >> >Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if
>> >> > anyone
>> >> >let
>> >> >me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which
>> >> > will
>> >> >make it really really fast. That would be great.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Thank you very much.
>> >> >
>> >> >Regards,
>> >> >Raj
>> >>
>> >>
>
>
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Ryan,
Do you mean up to 1000 concurrent users on tomcat/shindig can perform
really well?
If that is the case then i think i would be having only 500 to 700
concurrent users at any given point. so i guess it will suit very well for
my application.
Thank you
Regards,
Raj
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have seen Shindig perform well for 1000 or so users on a machine
> that is far inferior than the one you are using Raj. At the end of
> day I guess it all depends on the # of concurrent users you have,
> every machine has its limits,
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi Matt
> >
> > I am using shindig 2.5.1 ( the latest release ).
> >
> > My application is entirely build in php mysql except shindig so i need to
> > use both apache for php and tomcat for shindig, and in order to run that
> on
> > same domain i need to use ajp to frontend shindig.
> >
> > I got hifi server so really having 2000 thread i dont think an issue.
> >
> > I am just concern about the performance of shindig gadget rendering it is
> > fast but was thinking and getting people opinion here to make it really
> > really fast if possible.
> >
> > Otherwise i am happy with how it is now.
> >
> > May be Ryan can share some info here.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Regards,
> > Raj
> >
> > On Monday, September 29, 2014, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Raj,
> >>
> >> Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
> >>
> >> I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0 to
> >> Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
> >> created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
> >> same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes me
> >> think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
> >>
> >> I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
> >> implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
> >> through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig 2.0
> >> and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff.
> Instead,
> >> we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if that¹s
> >> still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think
> about
> >> as well if performance is an issue for you.
> >>
> >> -Matt
> >>
> >> On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janorkar@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Team,
> >> >
> >> >I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
> >> >aigns/todo/todo.xml
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
> >> >shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
> >> >tomcat
> >> >server.
> >> >
> >> >I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration
> for
> >> >Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
> >> >
> >> >Below are some details about system/application
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using
> my
> >> > site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
> >> > - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
> >> > - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
> >> > - SSD Drives on server
> >> > - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
> >> >connection
> >> > timeout - 60sec
> >> >
> >> >Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone
> >> >let
> >> >me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which
> will
> >> >make it really really fast. That would be great.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Thank you very much.
> >> >
> >> >Regards,
> >> >Raj
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by Ryan Baxter <rb...@gmail.com>.
I have seen Shindig perform well for 1000 or so users on a machine
that is far inferior than the one you are using Raj. At the end of
day I guess it all depends on the # of concurrent users you have,
every machine has its limits,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Matt
>
> I am using shindig 2.5.1 ( the latest release ).
>
> My application is entirely build in php mysql except shindig so i need to
> use both apache for php and tomcat for shindig, and in order to run that on
> same domain i need to use ajp to frontend shindig.
>
> I got hifi server so really having 2000 thread i dont think an issue.
>
> I am just concern about the performance of shindig gadget rendering it is
> fast but was thinking and getting people opinion here to make it really
> really fast if possible.
>
> Otherwise i am happy with how it is now.
>
> May be Ryan can share some info here.
>
> Thank you
>
> Regards,
> Raj
>
> On Monday, September 29, 2014, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Raj,
>>
>> Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
>>
>> I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0 to
>> Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
>> created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
>> same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes me
>> think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
>>
>> I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
>> implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
>> through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig 2.0
>> and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff. Instead,
>> we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if that¹s
>> still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think about
>> as well if performance is an issue for you.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janorkar@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Team,
>> >
>> >I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
>> >
>> >
>> http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
>> >aigns/todo/todo.xml
>> >
>> >
>> >I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
>> >shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
>> >tomcat
>> >server.
>> >
>> >I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration for
>> >Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
>> >
>> >Below are some details about system/application
>> >
>> >
>> > - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using my
>> > site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
>> > - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
>> > - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
>> > - SSD Drives on server
>> > - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
>> >connection
>> > timeout - 60sec
>> >
>> >Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone
>> >let
>> >me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which will
>> >make it really really fast. That would be great.
>> >
>> >
>> >Thank you very much.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Raj
>>
>>
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Matt
I am using shindig 2.5.1 ( the latest release ).
My application is entirely build in php mysql except shindig so i need to
use both apache for php and tomcat for shindig, and in order to run that on
same domain i need to use ajp to frontend shindig.
I got hifi server so really having 2000 thread i dont think an issue.
I am just concern about the performance of shindig gadget rendering it is
fast but was thinking and getting people opinion here to make it really
really fast if possible.
Otherwise i am happy with how it is now.
May be Ryan can share some info here.
Thank you
Regards,
Raj
On Monday, September 29, 2014, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
>
> I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0 to
> Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
> created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
> same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes me
> think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
>
> I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
> implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
> through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig 2.0
> and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff. Instead,
> we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if that¹s
> still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think about
> as well if performance is an issue for you.
>
> -Matt
>
> On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janorkar@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Team,
> >
> >I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
> >
> >
> http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
> >aigns/todo/todo.xml
> >
> >
> >I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
> >shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
> >tomcat
> >server.
> >
> >I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration for
> >Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
> >
> >Below are some details about system/application
> >
> >
> > - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using my
> > site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
> > - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
> > - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
> > - SSD Drives on server
> > - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
> >connection
> > timeout - 60sec
> >
> >Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone
> >let
> >me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which will
> >make it really really fast. That would be great.
> >
> >
> >Thank you very much.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Raj
>
>
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by Raj Janorkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hi Matt
I am using shindig 2.5.1 ( the latest release ).
My application is entirely build in php mysql except shindig so i need to
use both apache for php and tomcat for shindig, and in order to run that on
same domain i need to use ajp to frontend shindig.
I got hifi server so really having 2000 thread i dont think an issue.
I am just concern about the performance of shindig gadget rendering it is
fast but was thinking and getting people opinion here to make it really
really fast if possible.
Otherwise i am happy with how it is now.
May be Ryan can share some info here.
Thank you
Regards,
Raj
On Monday, September 29, 2014, Merrill, Matt <mm...@mitre.org> wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
>
> I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0 to
> Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
> created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
> same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes me
> think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
>
> I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
> implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
> through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig 2.0
> and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff. Instead,
> we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if that¹s
> still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think about
> as well if performance is an issue for you.
>
> -Matt
>
> On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <raj.janorkar@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi Team,
> >
> >I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
> >
> >
> http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
> >aigns/todo/todo.xml
> >
> >
> >I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
> >shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
> >tomcat
> >server.
> >
> >I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration for
> >Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
> >
> >Below are some details about system/application
> >
> >
> > - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using my
> > site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
> > - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
> > - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
> > - SSD Drives on server
> > - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
> >connection
> > timeout - 60sec
> >
> >Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone
> >let
> >me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which will
> >make it really really fast. That would be great.
> >
> >
> >Thank you very much.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Raj
>
>
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by "Merrill, Matt" <mm...@mitre.org>.
Hi Raj,
Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0 to
Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes me
think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig 2.0
and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff. Instead,
we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if that¹s
still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think about
as well if performance is an issue for you.
-Matt
On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Team,
>
>I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
>
>http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
>aigns/todo/todo.xml
>
>
>I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
>shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
>tomcat
>server.
>
>I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration for
>Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
>
>Below are some details about system/application
>
>
> - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using my
> site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
> - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
> - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
> - SSD Drives on server
> - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
>connection
> timeout - 60sec
>
>Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone
>let
>me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which will
>make it really really fast. That would be great.
>
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>Regards,
>Raj
Re: Optimized configuration in Tomcat for shindig
Posted by "Merrill, Matt" <mm...@mitre.org>.
Hi Raj,
Just curious, what version of shindig are you using?
I ask because for our organization, when we upgraded from Shindig 2.0 to
Shindig 2.5 we were using 350 maxThreads on the HTTP connector and it
created a severe bottleneck of some sort. However, for shindig 2.0 that
same setting worked very well. The fact that you¹re using 2000 makes me
think we could be wayyyyy low based on the newer versions of shindig.
I also know that before I came on my organization¹s shindig
implementation, a decision was made to NOT front Shindig with apache
through AJP. Apparently, our older implementation (based on Shindig 2.0
and earlier) got bottlenecked and wasn¹t performing up to snuff. Instead,
we have our shindig calls go directly to tomcat. I¹m not sure if that¹s
still needed based on newer shindig versions, but something to think about
as well if performance is an issue for you.
-Matt
On 9/28/14, 7:23 PM, "Raj Janorkar" <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Team,
>
>I have currently installed shindig on one my site below.
>
>http://portaltab.com/shindig/gadgets/ifr?url=http://www.labpixies.com/camp
>aigns/todo/todo.xml
>
>
>I am using apache (php) to serve all other pages, and Tomcat only for
>shindig to serve gadgets. Using AJP13 (mod_jk) to work with http and
>tomcat
>server.
>
>I would like to know from experts that what is the best configuration for
>Tomcat to *perform fast *and *render gadgets fast.*
>
>Below are some details about system/application
>
>
> - Once i implement it i may have 500 to 700 concurrent users using my
> site. around 40000 to 80000 users unique visit per day.
> - Server - Intel E5 - 2650V2 processor (32 cores)
> - Server Ram - 130GB Ram
> - SSD Drives on server
> - Tomcat Setup - Max Threads - 2000, min spare threads - 150,
>connection
> timeout - 60sec
>
>Taking under consideration of my requirements and what i have if anyone
>let
>me know what is the optimized configuration for shindig/tomcat which will
>make it really really fast. That would be great.
>
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>Regards,
>Raj