You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Mark Womack <wo...@adobe.com> on 2005/06/06 22:44:27 UTC
Release 1.2.11rc3?
So, before I call an official vote, I thought I would open it up for an
unofficial poll. Should we proceed with 1.2.11rc3 for the official release?
- I can work to run the tests under 1.4. I'll have to modify the witness
files, but it is probably straight forward enough.
- I want to mention the release plan going forward, so I would like to work
out those details (v1.3 vs v1.4), but we have a release plan in place that I
can document for now.
Any other concerns or items we should look at?
-Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: Release 1.2.11rc3?
Posted by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>.
Later than I planned, but I updated the 1.2 branch and the main branch with
the roadmap info. Please review and update if you think there should be
changes. I'm going for an official build end of day Friday (tomorrow).
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Womack" <wo...@adobe.com>
To: "'Log4J Developers List'" <lo...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:42 AM
Subject: RE: Release 1.2.11rc3?
> Today or tomorrow I am going to create a release road map doc page for the
> 1.2 branch and the web site that outlines what we have previously agreed
> to
> for the log4j release road map. Then I will build 1.2.11rc4 with those
> changes and call for a release vote. If anyone has anything to say in
> this
> regard, please bring it up before then.
>
> -Mark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Womack [mailto:womack@adobe.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:44 PM
>> To: 'Log4J Developers List'
>> Subject: Release 1.2.11rc3?
>>
>> So, before I call an official vote, I thought I would open it up for an
>> unofficial poll. Should we proceed with 1.2.11rc3 for the official
>> release?
>>
>> - I can work to run the tests under 1.4. I'll have to modify the witness
>> files, but it is probably straight forward enough.
>>
>> - I want to mention the release plan going forward, so I would like to
>> work
>> out those details (v1.3 vs v1.4), but we have a release plan in place
>> that
>> I
>> can document for now.
>>
>> Any other concerns or items we should look at?
>>
>> -Mark
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
RE: Release 1.2.11rc3?
Posted by Mark Womack <wo...@adobe.com>.
Today or tomorrow I am going to create a release road map doc page for the
1.2 branch and the web site that outlines what we have previously agreed to
for the log4j release road map. Then I will build 1.2.11rc4 with those
changes and call for a release vote. If anyone has anything to say in this
regard, please bring it up before then.
-Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Womack [mailto:womack@adobe.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 1:44 PM
> To: 'Log4J Developers List'
> Subject: Release 1.2.11rc3?
>
> So, before I call an official vote, I thought I would open it up for an
> unofficial poll. Should we proceed with 1.2.11rc3 for the official
> release?
>
> - I can work to run the tests under 1.4. I'll have to modify the witness
> files, but it is probably straight forward enough.
>
> - I want to mention the release plan going forward, so I would like to
> work
> out those details (v1.3 vs v1.4), but we have a release plan in place that
> I
> can document for now.
>
> Any other concerns or items we should look at?
>
> -Mark
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org