You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2010/07/06 18:03:50 UTC
[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-3616) Interface contract mapping always
successfully matches remote interfaces
Interface contract mapping always successfully matches remote interfaces
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: TUSCANY-3616
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
The interface contract mapping logic gives up when it finds remote interfaces as it may not be able to match different kinds of IDL. The Assemble spec says that we should be using WSDL1.1 as the matching IDL in the cases where matched interface IDLs differ.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-3616) Interface contract mapping always
successfully matches remote interfaces
Posted by "Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-3616.
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0
Resolution: Fixed
Changes committed at r963624. This exercise has highlighted issues in the namespaces that are generated for wrappers in WSDL. Separate JIRA to follow.
> Interface contract mapping always successfully matches remote interfaces
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3616
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Simon Laws
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
>
> Attachments: 3616-1.patch
>
>
> The interface contract mapping logic gives up when it finds remote interfaces as it may not be able to match different kinds of IDL. The Assemble spec says that we should be using WSDL1.1 as the matching IDL in the cases where matched interface IDLs differ.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-3616) Interface contract mapping always
successfully matches remote interfaces
Posted by "Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3616:
-----------------------------------
Assignee: Simon Laws
> Interface contract mapping always successfully matches remote interfaces
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3616
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Simon Laws
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Attachments: 3616-1.patch
>
>
> The interface contract mapping logic gives up when it finds remote interfaces as it may not be able to match different kinds of IDL. The Assemble spec says that we should be using WSDL1.1 as the matching IDL in the cases where matched interface IDLs differ.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-3616) Interface contract mapping always
successfully matches remote interfaces
Posted by "Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3616:
--------------------------------
Attachment: 3616-1.patch
Been collecting quite a few changes which I don't want to loose. Still failing tests.
> Interface contract mapping always successfully matches remote interfaces
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3616
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3616
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Core Runtime
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-M5
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Simon Laws
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Attachments: 3616-1.patch
>
>
> The interface contract mapping logic gives up when it finds remote interfaces as it may not be able to match different kinds of IDL. The Assemble spec says that we should be using WSDL1.1 as the matching IDL in the cases where matched interface IDLs differ.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.