You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Gennady Azarenkov <ga...@gmail.com> on 2006/02/27 16:52:53 UTC

TCK: SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException()

hi, 

in the SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException():

Node moveNode = srcParentNode.addNode(nodeName2, testNodeType); 
our implementation throws ConstraintViolationException as srcParentNode is nt:folder type and testNodeType == "nt:unstructured"
so could not be added

It works if i change a node type of adding node like:
Node moveNode = srcParentNode.addNode(nodeName2, getProperty("nodetype3"));

regards,

gena

Re: TCK: SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException()

Posted by Marcel Reutegger <ma...@gmx.net>.

Gennady Azarenkov wrote:
> BTW, i am using sources from trunk/jackrabbit/src/test/java ... is it ok?

sure, that's the source that will eventually go into a maintenance 
release of the TCK.

regards
  marcel

Re: TCK: SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException()

Posted by Gennady Azarenkov <ga...@gmail.com>.

hi Marcel,

yes, you are right, it is changed in latest srcs, sorry for noise so :)

BTW, i am using sources from trunk/jackrabbit/src/test/java ... is it ok?

thx,

gena

> Hi Gena,
>
> This has already been changed a while ago:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/test/api/SessionTest.java?rev=348915&r1=330540&r2=348915&diff_format=h
>
> or is there another test case that should be change similarly?
>
> regards
>  marcel
>
> Gennady Azarenkov wrote:
>> hi, in the SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException():
>>
>> Node moveNode = srcParentNode.addNode(nodeName2, testNodeType); our 
>> implementation throws ConstraintViolationException as srcParentNode is 
>> nt:folder type and testNodeType == "nt:unstructured"
>> so could not be added
>>
>> It works if i change a node type of adding node like:
>> Node moveNode = srcParentNode.addNode(nodeName2, 
>> getProperty("nodetype3"));
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> gena
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: TCK: SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException()

Posted by Marcel Reutegger <ma...@gmx.net>.

Hi Gena,

This has already been changed a while ago:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/test/api/SessionTest.java?rev=348915&r1=330540&r2=348915&diff_format=h

or is there another test case that should be change similarly?

regards
  marcel

Gennady Azarenkov wrote:
> hi, 
> 
> in the SessionTest.testMoveItemExistsException():
> 
> Node moveNode = srcParentNode.addNode(nodeName2, testNodeType); 
> our implementation throws ConstraintViolationException as srcParentNode is nt:folder type and testNodeType == "nt:unstructured"
> so could not be added
> 
> It works if i change a node type of adding node like:
> Node moveNode = srcParentNode.addNode(nodeName2, getProperty("nodetype3"));
> 
> regards,
> 
> gena
> 
> 
>