Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-5037) [drlvm][jit][opt] improper opcode group lookup

[chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>]

 I can also observe some failures introduced from the commit.
 Benchmarks of specJVM fails in server or JET mode, in 32bits/64bits
platform.
 Some GC helper can not be processed (if tunring on -XX:gc.prefetch=true)
now.
 Should we just roll back the commit and commit a more clean one later?
 Buqi, xiaoming, Alexey, others, do you have opinions?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Cheng, BuQi (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>    [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12638963#action_12638963]
>
> Cheng, BuQi commented on HARMONY-5037:
> --------------------------------------
>
> Hi Alexey:
>
>    Would you like to provide more information about the patch? The patch is
> too bigger to understand clearly.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Buqi
>
>
>
>
> > [drlvm][jit][opt] improper opcode group lookup
> > ----------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: HARMONY-5037
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5037
> >             Project: Harmony
> >          Issue Type: Bug
> >          Components: DRLVM
> >            Reporter: Alexey Varlamov
> >            Assignee: Alexey Varlamov
> >             Fix For: 5.0M7
>  >
> >         Attachments: enc64.diff, enc_lookup.patch,
> HARMONY-5037-enc_lookup_gt3_May23.patch
> >
> >
> > Encoder of Jitrino.OPT improperly matches OpcodeGroups, allowing to
> create invalid instructions. See for example HARMONY-5022
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>